God doesnt exist?

Mr Uncle Leroy

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
10,364
Reputation
-170
Daps
4,625
But sciencist spend $10 billion to find the God/creator particle

How do you find a Higgs boson? A crash course. (+video) - CSMonitor.com

Hhahahaahahh

Hahahahahahahah

Hahahhahahhahahahahahah

The universe so complex they gonna need trillions to figure it out...

Evolve from big bang? Well who made the atoms....

7 billion humans and no one can't say male or female...which came first...
Seriously which came first

Hahahhahahahhahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahaahahhahah

Bu bu but, I cannot see god? Its religious?

Bu bu bu but, I am sure science can explain why the mass of land, suspended in universe got there....stars, sun, moons, planets, glaxies, physics, biology, chemisty, rain, season,
Weather, life,

Science made man and woman, gave them memory, senses, eyes, nose, brain, heart,
Lungs, muscle, legs, intestine, bloods, thoughts, finger, unique fingerprint, etc...science did all that? Nope

Let's not forget animals too

Science give/tries meaning/enhance to God/creators wondrousness...and then
Some scientist think they are demigod

The world/humans is tooo complex

So who made the creator? Damn...
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,250
Reputation
3,818
Daps
106,511
Reppin
Detroit
Religious folk making logical and well-thought out points, as always.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,074
Reputation
14,287
Daps
190,625
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
:smh:

34dosv9.jpg


:lolbron:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,725
Reppin
NYC
:snoop:

But sciencist spend $10 billion to find the God/creator particle

No one has called it the "creator" particle besides you. It's called the god particle for very specific reasons, not because it created anything.

Evolve from big bang? Well who made the atoms....

Atoms are generated by stars, either through nuclear fusion processes or supernovas. We already know this.

7 billion humans and no one can't say male or female...which came first...
Seriously which came first

If you mean in terms of all life, then the answer is female, since self-reproducing females were the first products of what would eventually become full-on sexual dimorphism. If you mean in terms of humans, like us, then the answer is still females, which evolved thousands of years before the modern human male. Again, we already know this.

Bu bu bu but, I am sure science can explain why the mass of land, suspended in universe got there....stars, sun, moons, planets, glaxies, physics, biology, chemisty, rain, season,
Weather, life,

Yes, so far science has been able to explain every single thing you listed above except for life, in which we know the general picture but not some specifics, but we'll get to it eventually. And why would you list physics, biology, and chemistry as things that need to be explained by science when they are products of science?
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,942
So the OP is suggesting that instead of spending all that time, effort and resources to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we should just close our eyes and blindly follow the bearded man in the sky doctrine.

Ah, intellectual and emotional cowardice, the backbone of every religion.:ld:
 

AkaDemiK

I Love Hip-Hop
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,179
Reputation
6,160
Daps
106,157
So the OP is suggesting that instead of spending all that time, effort and resources to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we should just close our eyes and blindly follow the bearded man in the sky doctrine.

Ah, intellectual and emotional cowardice, the backbone of every religion.:ld:
 

Mr Uncle Leroy

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
10,364
Reputation
-170
Daps
4,625
No one has called it the "creator" particle besides you. It's called the god particle for very specific reasons, not because it created anything.
The phrase "God particle," coined by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman, more as an explanation for how the subatomic universe works than how it all started. Definition of CREATOR

: one that creates usually by bringing something new or original into being; especially capitalized : god 1

Atoms are generated by stars, either through nuclear fusion processes or supernovas. We already know this.
The atom is a basic unit of matter that consists of a dense central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. The atomic nucleus contains a mix of positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons (except in the case of hydrogen-1, which is the only stable nuclide with no neutrons). The electrons of an atom are bound to the nucleus by the electromagnetic force. Likewise, a group of atoms can remain bound to each other, forming a molecule. An atom containing an equal number of protons and electrons is electrically neutral, otherwise it has a positive charge if there are fewer electrons (electron deficiency) or negative charge if there are more electrons (electron excess). A positively or negatively charged atom is known as an ion. An atom is classified according to the number of protons and neutrons in its nucleus: the number of protons determines the chemical element, and the number of neutrons determines the isotope of the element.[1]


If you mean in terms of all life, then the answer is female, since self-reproducing females were the first products of what would eventually become full-on sexual dimorphism. If you mean in terms of humans, like us, then the answer is still females, which evolved thousands of years before the modern human male. Again, we already know this.

- (By Faith)

As a Christian, one would have to believe the word of Christ. Which states that the woman is of the man.

Genesis 2:

21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

For those who believe the New Testament holds the only truth, and that the Old Testament was created solely for the benefit of male chauvanists, Christ and the Apostles disagree:

ROMANS 16:26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:

2TIMOTHY 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

And further, the New Testament greatly confirms the words of Moses, (who wrote Genesis):

I Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

- (By Science & Logic)

However, even nature, evolution, and logic support this. The anatomy of the man is not designed to receive from the woman. Yet, the woman's anatomy is designed to receive from the man. The nature of a man retains his independance, (needing the woman solely for incubation of his seed). However, the woman's body, durring pregnancy, is completely devoted to the nurturing and incubation of the man's seed. As well, the nature of the woman, ultimately, requires her dependance of the man durring pregnancy and post-pregnancy.

Evolutionists believe that organisms evolve to become stronger, and for greater chance of survial. However, in the case of man and woman, the woman is notably reliant on the provision, aid, protection, and care of the man, (again, such as in pregnancy, and post-pregnancy). Thus, the man having the greater advantage of survival over the woman, (although I truly believe the man needs the woman, and the woman needs the man). Therefore, even evolution would support that the woman derived from the man.

but really...its science explaining what it tries to know? so females didnt have sex...for millions of years and evolved? how did they reproduce...fact of the matter is female was constructed and so was the man...and the offspring abilities was created...

Yes, so far science has been able to explain every single thing you listed above except for life, in which we know the general picture but not some specifics, but we'll get to it eventually. And why would you list physics, biology, and chemistry as things that need to be explained by science when they are products of science?
Nature exists...then science tries to explain...

God/Creator for those who think there is no God...Gods/Creator smade a complexities of beings/things on earth/world/hemisphere...include nature, humans, animals, etc...Science tries to explain for a tangible perspective...so a bunch of humans, born into a mystery, tries to explain how they got there...ok...Science might then try to expand, but then science, classified its explanations into various science areas: physics, biology, chemistry, genealogy, etc

Physics is a natural science that involves the study of matter and its motion through spacetime, along with related concepts such as energy and force. More broadly, it is the general analysis of nature, conducted in order to understand how the universe behaves.

Biology is a natural science concerned with the study of life and living organisms, including their structure, function, growth, origin, evolution, distribution, and taxonomy. Biology is a vast subject containing many subdivisions, topics, and disciplines. Among the most important topics are five unifying principles that can be said to be the fundamental axioms of modern biology: Cells are the basic unit of life
New species and inherited traits are the product of evolution
Genes are the basic unit of heredity
An organism regulates its internal environment to maintain a stable and constant condition
Living organisms consume and transform energy.

Chemistry is the science of matter, especially its chemical reactions, but also its composition, structure and properties. Chemistry is concerned with atoms and their interactions with other atoms, and particularly with the properties of chemical bonds. Chemistry is sometimes called "the central science" because it connects physics with other natural sciences such as geology and biology.Chemistry is a branch of physical science but distinct from physics

Genealogy is the study of families and the tracing of their lineages and history. Genealogists use oral traditions, historical records, genetic analysis, and other records to obtain information about a family and to demonstrate kinship and pedigrees of its members. The results are often displayed in charts or written as narratives.
 

Mr Uncle Leroy

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
10,364
Reputation
-170
Daps
4,625
So the OP is suggesting that instead of spending all that time, effort and resources to unravel the mysteries of the universe, we should just close our eyes and blindly follow the bearded man in the sky doctrine.

Ah, intellectual and emotional cowardice, the backbone of every religion.:ld:

Religion is a collection of cultural systems, belief systems, and worldviews that relate humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values. Many religions have narratives, symbols, traditions and sacred histories that are intended to give meaning to life or to explain the origin of life or the universe. They tend to derive morality, ethics, religious laws or a preferred lifestyle from their ideas about the cosmos and human nature.
The word religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system, but religion differs from private belief in that it has a social aspect. Many religions have organized behaviors, clergy, a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership, congregations of laity, regular meetings or services for the purposes of veneration of a deity or for prayer, holy places (either natural or architectural), and/or scriptures. The practice of a religion may also include sermons, commemoration of the activities of a god or gods, sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trance, initiations, funerary services, matrimonial services, meditation, music, art, dance, public service, or other aspects of human culture.

Emotional faith is commonality in majority of religions...coward is one who shows disgraceful fear or timidity...faith is a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty
b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
2
a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion

For billion of billion of people practicing religion, without touching/seeing the "God", takes and requires Faith...

Even in Science, research on those who live past 100 years old, research shows those who had faith/believe in God, in addition to various also critical factors...had a chance to live past 100 years old...faith/religions when practiced positively have good outcomes...
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,725
Reppin
NYC
The phrase "God particle," coined by Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman, more as an explanation for how the subatomic universe works than how it all started. Definition of CREATOR

: one that creates usually by bringing something new or original into being; especially capitalized : god 1

Yes, exactly. It's called the God particle because it helps explain how the universe works, not how it was created. It has nothing to do with bringing new or original things into being. You just helped correct yourself.

The atom is a basic unit of matter that consists of a dense central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. The atomic nucleus contains a mix of positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons (except in the case of hydrogen-1, which is the only stable nuclide with no neutrons). The electrons of an atom are bound to the nucleus by the electromagnetic force. Likewise, a group of atoms can remain bound to each other, forming a molecule. An atom containing an equal number of protons and electrons is electrically neutral, otherwise it has a positive charge if there are fewer electrons (electron deficiency) or negative charge if there are more electrons (electron excess). A positively or negatively charged atom is known as an ion. An atom is classified according to the number of protons and neutrons in its nucleus: the number of protons determines the chemical element, and the number of neutrons determines the isotope of the element.[1]

What do these huge passages from wikipedia have to do with anything?

As a Christian, one would have to believe the word of Christ. Which states that the woman is of the man.

Genesis 2:

21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

For those who believe the New Testament holds the only truth, and that the Old Testament was created solely for the benefit of male chauvanists, Christ and the Apostles disagree:

ROMANS 16:26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:

2TIMOTHY 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

And further, the New Testament greatly confirms the words of Moses, (who wrote Genesis):

I Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

- (By Science & Logic)

That's great, but we already know it isn't true. The human race isn't descended from Adam and Eve, and the people who wrote the Bible didn't know science like we do now.

However, even nature, evolution, and logic support this. The anatomy of the man is not designed to receive from the woman. Yet, the woman's anatomy is designed to receive from the man. The nature of a man retains his independance, (needing the woman solely for incubation of his seed). However, the woman's body, durring pregnancy, is completely devoted to the nurturing and incubation of the man's seed. As well, the nature of the woman, ultimately, requires her dependance of the man durring pregnancy and post-pregnancy.

Nah, they don't, breh. "Receiving" has nothing to do with who came first, nor does dependence or independence. In ancient organisms, self-reproducing females evolved first, then males came along much later when the act of reproduction split between them.

Evolutionists believe that organisms evolve to become stronger, and for greater chance of survial. However, in the case of man and woman, the woman is notably reliant on the provision, aid, protection, and care of the man, (again, such as in pregnancy, and post-pregnancy). Thus, the man having the greater advantage of survival over the woman, (although I truly believe the man needs the woman, and the woman needs the man). Therefore, even evolution would support that the woman derived from the man.

Nah, they don't. This is not how evolution works. Regardless, the man having greater physical strength than a woman is not evidence that they came first. Anyway, though, there's a contradiction here- according to the way you've described it, organisms evolve to become stronger, right? That means the weaker organism, woman, came first, even by your own logic.

but really...its science explaining what it tries to know? so females didnt have sex...for millions of years and evolved? how did they reproduce...fact of the matter is female was constructed and so was the man...and the offspring abilities was created...

Nah, they did have sex. If you mean pre-human organisms, they were able to self-reproduce. If you mean humans, modern females had sex with pre-modern males for thousands of years. Eventually modern males emerged out of that process.
 
Top