Go get check brehs, she lost mad weight

skeetsinternal

I never see my nut
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
33,061
Reputation
8,500
Daps
89,115
Reppin
Cervixes
Remember them "specials" on hamster/coli NJ/NYC brehs?


Before
2012-04-14_00-23-36_202.jpg
2012-04-10_17-16-55_952_1.png
kayyah.jpg

AFTER
image-7.jpg
IMG_20130801_102637.jpg

QUOTES FROM REVIEW SITE

I have seen her ad a few times and finally decided to try, two call system. She was nice but pics are a little deceiving, top is big but saaaaggy, bottom not as big as it seemed it pics to me either. Makeup was either bad or she had a recent black eye. She had a nice attitude overall but i would not repeat based on body.

......I red other reviews and most experiences says it was very mechanical. I still went ahead for those 34e as advertised. I was very disappointed by service (no surprises there) even by looks and her attitude. The 34e does not look nice as they look in picture, she seems to have lost weight compared to her pictures and so they are very droopy. I am not sure if they are E but they are bigger compared to her frame but that’s all nothing attractive, does not feel great either. .......You will feel you wasted you time and money.

Nothing more than a Quickie is recommended. Although pics are real, "34E" is quite the exaggeration. Between D and DD at best, albeit on a very thin frame.​
 

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
31,324
Reputation
-5,535
Daps
63,089
Reppin
BK
I don't see any difference. :yeshrug:
Her photos could be shopped though. I can tell you off first glance that she never really had an ass like or real thickness at any point.. I'm not fooled by pics like that.
 

skeetsinternal

I never see my nut
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
33,061
Reputation
8,500
Daps
89,115
Reppin
Cervixes
I don't see any difference. :yeshrug:
Her photos could be shopped though. I can tell you off first glance that she never really had an ass like or real thickness at any point.. I'm not fooled by pics like that.
the AFTER pics are what she uses now.....she is even skinnier now, hence the reviews she has gotten
 

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
31,324
Reputation
-5,535
Daps
63,089
Reppin
BK
the AFTER pics are what she uses now.....she is even skinnier now, hence the reviews she has gotten

Like I said, I don't see much of a difference.. She was never that thick to begin with. Her arms and legs look just as thin in the before pic IMO.

Anyways, nikkas lost for paying to fukk that. Definitely not my kinda chick.
 

skeetsinternal

I never see my nut
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
33,061
Reputation
8,500
Daps
89,115
Reppin
Cervixes
Like I said, I don't see much of a difference.. She was never that thick to begin with. Her arms and legs look just as thin in the before pic IMO.

Anyways, nikkas lost for paying to fukk that. Definitely not my kinda chick.
p*ssy is p*ssy. Hamster nikkas ate good off them "specials" a few years back and gave no fukks
 

Buzzed Lightyear

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Messages
5,141
Reputation
1,000
Daps
16,457
Reppin
NULL
If a female use the same stance/pose in just about every picture, the booty ain't what it appears. That & the patented "Sink Booty Pose".
 
Top