Gimmick *** Oregon losing appreciation thread

Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
8,296
Reputation
-700
Daps
8,223
Reppin
NULL
Once again proves a tough physical defensive team is the kryptonite to that bs soft finesses and the opposite of what football stands for gimmick of a team

Salute to Stanford for defeating evil and keeping the purity of what footballs about alive :obama:
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,510
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,504
Reppin
Auburn, AL
gizzle didnt understand what i mean when i said fluff

you can mask deficiencies on the lines for only so long

the right team exposes it always
 

Roaden Polynice

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,346
Reputation
236
Daps
18,943
FreedS[ohh]lave;2232146 said:
Once again proves a tough physical defensive team is the kryptonite to that bs soft finesses and the opposite of what football stands for gimmick of a team

Salute to Stanford for defeating evil and keeping the purity of what footballs about alive :obama:

So what is football about then?
 
A

A Friend of The People

Guest
Seems like Oregon chokes every year

Didnt the one time they actually made it to the title game they got ran thru?

Honestly who didnt expect them to cough one up again?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
69,167
Reputation
11,432
Daps
241,822
Reppin
206 & 734
gizzle didnt understand what i mean when i said fluff

you can mask deficiencies on the lines for only so long

the right team exposes it always

No...i understood...i just disagreed. I dont believe they have a deficient defense or offensive line....they gave up 2 tds to a legit stanford team...how many scores did alabama give up to tamu....in the first half....


Stanfords defensive line is legit as hell...i think thats the fallacy here

When a non sec team loses its because they suck and are exposed
When an sec team loses its because the other team was so good and its tough to win in that stadium

Another example of bias
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
252,177
Reputation
31,742
Daps
770,819
Reppin
Top 4
FreedS[ohh]lave;2232146 said:
Once again proves a tough physical defensive team is the kryptonite to that bs soft finesses and the opposite of what football stands for gimmick of a team

Salute to Stanford for defeating evil and keeping the purity of what footballs about alive :obama:

:notimpressed:

your acting like oregon got blown out, like oregon wasnt missing 2 starters on its offensive line. only 3 teams in all of fbs were undefeated yesterday and oregon was one of them

oregon still had 408 yards, 200 rushing yards against a team thats first in the fbs only giving up 50 rushing yards a game

EVERY TEAM Loses, its only when oregon loses do the they are a gimmick folks come out

oregons past 4 losses 3/4 they have lost by 2 points, 3 points, and 3 points

only the lsu game due to turnovers was the margin higher


try harder :notimpressed:
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,510
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,504
Reppin
Auburn, AL
No...i understood...i just disagreed. I dont believe they have a deficient defense or offensive line....they gave up 2 tds to a legit stanford team...how many scores did alabama give up to tamu....in the first half....


Stanfords defensive line is legit as hell...i think thats the fallacy here

When a non sec team loses its because they suck and are exposed
When an sec team loses its because the other team was so good and its tough to win in that stadium

Another example of bias

you dont understand if you think Oregon is talented on either line :vince:

TAMU has much greater talent in the trenches than Oregon
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
8,296
Reputation
-700
Daps
8,223
Reppin
NULL
:notimpressed:

your acting like oregon got blown out, like oregon wasnt missing 2 starters on its offensive line. only 3 teams in all of fbs were undefeated yesterday and oregon was one of them

oregon still had 408 yards, 200 rushing yards against a team thats first in the fbs only giving up 50 rushing yards a game

EVERY TEAM Loses, its only when oregon loses do the they are a gimmick folks come out

oregons past 4 losses 3/4 they have lost by 2 points, 3 points, and 3 points

only the lsu game due to turnovers was the margin higher


try harder :notimpressed:

You worship a false prophet breh:ufdup:
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
252,177
Reputation
31,742
Daps
770,819
Reppin
Top 4
No...i understood...i just disagreed. I dont believe they have a deficient defense or offensive line....they gave up 2 tds to a legit stanford team...how many scores did alabama give up to tamu....in the first half....


Stanfords defensive line is legit as hell...i think thats the fallacy here

When a non sec team loses its because they suck and are exposed
When an sec team loses its because the other team was so good and its tough to win in that stadium

Another example of bias

:mj:

people act like stanford is chopped liver
stanford was only giving up 50 yards rushing a game, their front 7 is the best in the fbs, their big as hell and fast as hell.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
252,177
Reputation
31,742
Daps
770,819
Reppin
Top 4
FreedS[ohh]lave;2233504 said:
You worship a false prophet breh:ufdup:

pathetic breh pathetic

oregon has lost 4 times in the past 3 years in a bcs conference yet they are a gimmick?
 
Top