For me the story was just background noise.It's a wonderful film, though slightly unfocused and dreamlike.
It touched on severaly very interesting concepts and ideas but nothing was ever too concrete.
How I read it is that it was simply a portrait of Americans trying to make sense of the world after WWII and along with that it was a love story.
For me the story was just background noise.
It was a character study that can easily be used as a template to view modern figures.
While I was watching I kept thinking of this quote.
If the world is something you accept rather than interpret, then you’re susceptible to the influence of charismatic idiots.
Neil deGrasse Tyson
True story a friend of mine is in the actors union as an extra in movies, done a few commercials.The interesting thing is though that I don't think PTA was trying to make a film that critiqued or exposed scientology. Scientology and Hubbard specifically were the jumping point into the story and the greatest influence but I think it's less concerned with attacking religions/cults/faith and more interested in the central relationship between Freddie and Dodd. I really liked how PTA didn't portray Dodd as some kinda sinister crook, which would've been easy to do. But Dodd whilst clearly a fraud and making shyt up as he goes long, is kinda likable and in some weird way I think he believe what he was doing was helping people. He was misguided and somewhat of an egomaniac but certainly not a one dimmensional L Ron Hubbard cypher. Of course some of that is also down to the gawd Hoffman's incredible performance. A lesser actor would've played it much more straight forward.
On the real though I still can't bring myself to watch any of Hoffman's films since his death. shyt is depressing to watch a talent like that go out that way.