Feds: Hospitals that denied emergency abortion broke the law

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
54,839
Reputation
8,165
Daps
155,131
Hospitals that denied emergency abortion broke the law, feds say

By AMANDA SEITZ 51 minutes ago

1000.webp

Mylissa Farmer stands for a portrait at her home in Joplin, Mo., on Sept. 28, 2022. In early August, Farmer had to travel to Illinois to terminate her pregnancy when her water broke at 17 weeks and 5 days and put her life in danger. (Nathan Papes/The Springfield News-Leader via AP, File)

1000.webp


WASHINGTON (AP) — Two hospitals that refused to provide an emergency abortion to a pregnant woman who was experiencing premature labor put her life in jeopardy and violated federal law, a first-of-its-kind investigation by the federal government has found.

The findings, revealed in documents obtained by The Associated Press, are a warning to hospitals around the country as they struggle to reconcile dozens of new state laws that ban or severely restrict abortion with a federal mandate for doctors to provide abortions when a woman’s health is at risk. The competing edicts have been rolled out since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion last year.

ABORTION COVERAGE​
But federal law, which requires doctors to treat patients in emergency situations, trumps those state laws, the nation’s top health official said in a statement.

“Fortunately, this patient survived. But she never should have gone through the terrifying ordeal she experienced in the first place,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said. “We want her, and every patient out there like her, to know that we will do everything we can to protect their lives and health, and to investigate and enforce the law to the fullest extent of our legal authority, in accordance with orders from the courts.”

The federal agency’s investigation centers on two hospitals — Freeman Health System in Joplin, Missouri, and University of Kansas Hospital in Kansas City, Kansas — that in August refused to provide an abortion to a Missouri woman whose water broke early at 17 weeks of pregnancy. Doctors at both hospitals told Mylissa Farmer that her fetus would not survive, that her amniotic fluid had emptied and that she was at risk for serious infection or losing her uterus, but they would not terminate the pregnancy because a fetal heartbeat was still detectable.

Ultimately, Farmer had to travel to an abortion clinic in Illinois.

“It was dehumanizing. It was terrifying. It was horrible not to get the care to save your life,” Farmer, who lives in Joplin, said of her experience. “I felt like I was responsible to do something, to say something, to not have this happen again to another woman. It was bad enough to be so powerless.”

Farmer’s complaints launched the first investigations that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, has publicly acknowledged since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year. Across the country, women have reported being turned away from hospitals for abortions, despite doctors telling them that this puts them at further risk for infection or even death.

President Joe Biden’s administration has prodded hospitals not to turn away patients in those situations, even when state law forbids abortions. Weeks after the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Democratic administration reminded hospitals that federal law requires them to offer an abortion when a pregnant woman is at risk for an emergency medical condition. The federal government can investigate hospitals that receive Medicare and Medicaid money — which encompasses most facilities in the U.S. — for violations of the law.

Abortions are largely banned in Missouri, but there are exceptions for medical emergencies. In Kansas, when Farmer visited the hospital, abortions were still legal up to 22 weeks. It’s unclear why University of Kansas Health refused to offer Farmer one. Neither hospital immediately provided comment on the case.

CMS has not announced any fines or other penalties against the two hospitals in its investigation, but it did send them notices warning that they were in violation of the law and asking them to correct the problems that led to Farmer being turned away. Federal Medicare investigators will follow up with the hospitals before closing the case.

That likely won’t be enough to convince hospitals and doctors that they should provide abortions in states where they’re operating under the threat of prison time or large fines if they terminate a pregnancy, said Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis.

“I don’t know how much this approach really helps matters. The possibility of being criminalized for providing care is still there for a lot of these doctors,” Ziegler said. “The incentive here would be to do nothing. The incentive here would be to turn the patient away.”

Nationwide, doctors have reported uncertainty around how to provide care to pregnant women, especially in the nearly 20 states where new laws have banned or limited the care. Doctors face criminal and civil penalties in some states for aborting a pregnancy.

But in a letter sent Monday to hospital and doctors’ associations that highlights the inquiries, Becerra said he hopes the investigations clarify that the organizations must follow the federal law, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA.

“While many state laws have recently changed,” Becerra wrote, “it’s important to know that the federal EMTALA requirements have not changed, and continue to require that health care professionals offer treatment, including abortion care, that the provider reasonably determines is necessary to stabilize the patient’s emergency medical condition.
 

Commish

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
7,081
Reputation
2,603
Daps
23,811
Will the Feds punish the hospital that refused to provide emergency abortion for the woman on question? Are the doctors involved subjected to losing their license?
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,438
Reputation
1,164
Daps
18,229
so doctors and hospitals are damned if they do and damned if they don't. :francis:
Yeah, at least in the states with restrictive abortion laws.

That's why we're going to see more of this: Survey shows Idaho's maternal health doctors are leaving the state, or soon will - Idaho Capital Sun

Look for a surge in maternal deaths and a lack of maternal care options in these places. Then consider how rural America already has issues with access to health care and think about how this will only exacerbate it.

It's the ultimate irony that anti-abortion laws are actually going to be what ends up killing a lot of people. So much for the sanctity of life.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
69,740
Reputation
13,663
Daps
295,934
Reppin
Toronto
Lawsuits :banderas: these laws will change soon
But that won't fix the problem because rethugs know they can pimp abortion every election cycle because the topic appeals heavily to every moralist that need to project.

True progress will mean abortion is no longer a hot topic every election cycle because that shyt is a joke.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,716
Reputation
9,783
Daps
118,178
so doctors and hospitals are damned if they do and damned if they don't. :francis:
They've penned open letters and the medical research is clear. There's no ambiguity around this topic. An abortion is a medically necessary procedure that doctors can decide on using and many religions allow.

The situation we are in is a direct result of politicians legislating based off personal feelings instead of objective facts and what the majority of voters have already said they want. If you're a doctor in a red state you're very likely going to pack it up and move if in 2024 Republicans make gains. Doctors and nurses have the best job security on earth and they don't have to put up with this shyt. If a doctor leaves the state, they're more or less guaranteed work in less than 2 weeks. This is perhaps one of the top dumbest moves Republicans can and have made. Right up there with consistently pushing economic theories that don't work(supply side economics) doing nothing about mass shootings and climate change denial.

If you're a republican you've basically just admitted you don't give a shyt about most of the country as long as you get Tax cuts and people with less money than you suffer.

School shootings don't bother you because your kids go to private school

Climate change doesn't bother you because you'll be dead before the worst effects start hitting you.

Women dying doesn't bother you because you've already got a woman or don't care about them.

Homelessness doesn't bother you because you live in a suburb. You live in an isolated reality where these things don't affect you. Being a republican today is the equivalent of loudly declaring "fukk you all. I got mine"
 
Last edited:

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,413
Reputation
4,160
Daps
76,457
Reppin
North Jersey
But that won't fix the problem because rethugs know they can pimp abortion every election cycle because the topic appeals heavily to every moralist that need to project.

True progress will mean abortion is no longer a hot topic every election cycle because that shyt is a joke.
Hospital boards will start pushing back on these Handmaid's tale policie if people start throwing around malpractice lawsuits or close down.

Attacking the money never fails.
 

voiture

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,128
Reputation
72
Daps
13,048
The MAGAs are going after abortion because their numbers are dropping like a rock
 
Top