Facebook, Gmail, Skype face Russia ban under 'anti-terror' plan

thernbroom

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
17,063
Reputation
1,680
Daps
44,884
:mjpls: Russia on some Nazi Germany shyt now days. Setting pieces in place for the big move.

The Russian parliament's latest play could see major Western technology firms banned unless they store data on Russian soil -- a move that would allow authorities to easily snoop on user data.

Russia's parliament has passed legislation that could see Western technology firms barred from operating if they fail to store Russian data within the country.

The "Information, Information Technologies and Protection of Information" amendment, part of the country's anti-terrorism laws, would require Russian data handled by tech giants such as Facebook, Google's Gmail, and Microsoft's Skype to be stored within the country in order for it to be accessed by state security and intelligence services for legal inspection.

Currently, Russian authorities have no powers to acquire data outside its borders, unless they submit a lawful mutual legal assistance request, which can be denied by another nation.

Should domestic Russian or foreign email, social networking, and instant messaging providers fail to provide access to six months' worth of data, they face being barred from operating in the country altogether.

The Russian Duma, the country's lower house, moved to adopt the legislation as of Tuesday following a successful third reading of the bill.

The legislation -- which has yet to be approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin -- would force foreign companies to install servers and data centers inside Russia in order to be compliant. It would give the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB, formerly KGB) and other media and "mass communication" regulators greater control over the Russian Internet and could see sites removed from the country's Internet register.

That would mean Internet providers on Russian soil could be forced to block access to sites and services, preventing them from being accessible to the general public.

It comes just two weeks after the European Union's highest court overturned similar, controversial data-retention laws, which had forced Internet providers to store data for up to two years for law enforcement and intelligence purposes.

As a non-European Union member, Russia recognizes some Brussels-born legislation in order to maintain relations with the 28-member state bloc, but actively rejects others -- not least in its anti-terrorism and data
collection legislation.

Bloggers, citizen activists affected
The legislation (translated) states that any site operating in the country does "not allow... for the dissemination of materials... publicly justifying terrorism and other extremist materials, and materials that promote pornography, violence and cruelty, and materials containing obscene language."

It comes less than two years after the Russian government implemented an Internet blacklist law under the guise of anti-pornography and extremist sites rhetoric, which allows the Russian authorities to censor sites that would hamper political opponents of the ruling administration.

The Kremlin-supported bill, which passed in July 2012, forced any website falling foul of its strict anti-"extremist" law to remove content or face being added to the blacklist within 24 hours.

The "blacklist" law came at a time during the pus*y Riot furor, which landed the four members of the Russian punk band in prison for two years after they allegedly broke hooliganism laws, a criminal offense under the country's judicial system.

The band's videos, uploaded to YouTube and other sites, were blocked from access within the country following a Russian court's decision to classify the content as "extremist" material under the blacklist law.

Yandex, a Russia-based Internet provider, said in a statement (translated): "In our opinion, the adoption of the law will be another step towards the strengthening of state control over the Internet in Russia, which has a negative impact on the development industry."

The legislation can also be applied to bloggers, citizen journalists, and activists, according to the bill's text, which would also force them to "place on their website... their name and initials, the email address for sending him a legally meaningful message."

Increasing isolation
The Putin and Medvedev tag-team administration has since 2012 ramped up its Internet monitoring and censorship activities as it faces increased pressure from Western governments over claims of internal power struggles and political corruption -- not least from opposition political groups that claim they are being oppressed by the federal government.

Russia, with a population of more than 145 million, continues to face increasing isolation from the G8 group of countries over its annexation of Crimea after the former Ukrainian president fled the country amid an uprising earlier this year. The annexation, decried as an unconstitutional move by the Ukrainian government, led the peninsula to become de-facto Russian territory, but has not been legally recognized by the US or European authorities.

Russia's recent legislature has led privacy experts to warn of the restriction of freedom of speech, information, and politics of opposition members critical of the Kremlin and Putin regime.

In the past week alone, Pavel Durov, founder of Russia's largest social network, VK.com, which has more than 100 million users, claimed he was fired, according to BBC News. He alleges that allies of Putin took over the site after he refused requests from the Russian government to censor posts on his site.

Durov has since fled Russia and says he has no plans to return. "[Russia] is now incompatible with Internet business at the moment," he told TechCrunch in an interview on Wednesday.

Russia's lower parliament has also banned swearing in films, plays, concerts and shows, BBC News reports.


Facebook, Gmail, Skype face Russia ban under 'anti-terror' plan - CNET
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,295
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
yuri told us how they work....they seem to be pretty good at social engineering...
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
-- a move that would allow authorities to easily snoop on user data.


tumblr_mx1lg4E67E1rqd0kpo1_400.gif
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,743
Reputation
-982
Daps
5,350
Considering the fact that the NSA snooping into the meta deta, as has been claimed by Snowden, why shouldn't the Russian government make efforts to hinder that?
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,743
Reputation
-982
Daps
5,350
Also, anybody that is interested in reading the discussion that lead to the '...CIA project' comment can read the transcript.
It is available at the website for the Russian president

President of Russia

excerpt below:

VIKTOR LEVANOV
: My name is Viktor Levanov, and I’m a blogger.

Here is my question: during the developments in Crimea, there were many attacks on Russian websites: sites of TV channels, other media and government organisations. According to experts and to certain data, US special services and the National Security Agency were behind those attacks; they were launched from the territories of the United States, Europe and Ukraine.

It is an open secret that the United States control the Internet. The Patriot Act gives them all the power they need. Now the former agent Edward Snowden has opened our eyes. This Act, adopted 80 years ago, in 1934, still allows the President of the United States to shut down communications on the entire planet with a single resolution. How is this possible?

Take Google. I use Google, for instance, all of its services. I am certain that many government officials and major politicians use Google.

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Use Yandex.

VIKTOR LEVANOV: I will get to Yandex shortly too, I will get to all of them.

We use Google, which collects users’ personal data. And where does it all go? It all goes to servers in the USA. Hence the question: why can’t they build servers here? I do not want my personal data and information about politicians that run my country to go to the United States.

Now over to Yandex, since you mentioned it.

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Let me respond to this part first.

Of course, we can and should do this. The only thing is that it all takes time and capital investment. Meanwhile, everything you said is true, pure and simple, as they say – everything goes through servers located in the United States, everything is monitored there.

You should simply always bear in mind that such is the reality created by the Americans. They are the ones who did it. You know that it all began initially, when the Internet first appeared, as a special CIA project. And this is the way it is developing.

The rest is what has made it to the market and took on huge proportions. Nevertheless, it is initially a military programme, a special programme, and special services are still at the centre of things.

However, I know Yandex, VKontakte and other search engines are trying to develop hardware here, and most importantly, they are also working on software. This is happening, but it takes time and money.

Our companies did not have sufficient resources to invest – now these resources are appearing and the process has begun. I hope it will develop quickly enough and will serve our interests.

VIKTOR LEVANOV: May I ask about Yandex now?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: Yes, go ahead.

VIKTOR LEVANOV: About Yandex: it is good to know that they are developing in Russia and are doing all these things. However, if we speak of the information side of the matter, it is not quite clear what Yandex is: on the one hand we know it as a search engine, where you enter some words and find the information you need; but on the other hand it is a kind of media, because all the time, every day the top five news items Yandex collects from other sources are viewed by millions of people. Meanwhile, Yandex does not have a media license and cannot be held liable under the law as a media outlet because it is a search engine.

I am not suggesting shutting it down or anything. I simply want to know when our Government will begin making decisions to free us of digital aggression. Thank you.

VLADIMIR PUTIN: As for protection of information, our special services are also working on it and are introducing special security systems. Primarily this has to do with classified information of the Defence Ministry, the defence industry, and government agencies, primarily federal ones. Some things are moving forward, while others are not going so well.

From what we have learned from Mr Snowden, the US NSA is very efficient. This is a kind of informational confrontation. It always existed, and now it is acquiring new forms on a new technical basis. We have our own special services who are also working on this.

As for the civil sector in general, we already agreed that servers need to be moved and information has to be closed.

Regarding Yandex, things are not that simple either. I will not say now what they can do and how. However, both the Government and the Presidential Executive Office are now working on this issue – I am sure you know it; it is discussed publicly – defining the term ‘media’.

You are a blogger. I will not express any opinion now so as not to take sides, however if a certain person influences the views of thousands, tens of thousands of people, essentially this blog can also be termed ‘media’. It affects thousands of people, maybe even hundreds of thousands, I don’t know. A talented person can do this. Why not?

In this case, it is definitely a media outlet. The public has to understand this, assess it and make a balanced decision in the democratic way, via State Duma Deputies. For instance, they can first have a public discussion, say organised by the Russian Popular Front, in the Civic Chamber and so forth. Only we have to make sure we do not have any excesses here; we should not impose any bans. We must proceed from reality and act accordingly, the way it is done all over the world.

As for Yandex – I repeat, it is not so simple either. We have to ask them what they can and cannot do. However, when they were starting out, they were forced to have a certain number of Americans and Europeans on their management team, remember? And they had to agree to this. This is why it is a national system.

Part of their registration is also abroad. This is done not only for tax purposes, but for many other reasons as well. This is a complicated area. As I have said, this was all created by the Americans and they want to retain their monopoly. However, they say monopoly is bad; it is only good if it is their own monopoly.

It is impossible in the modern world, but we need to consistently protect our interests. The process is underway and the state will support it.
 
Top