Eyes Are 500 Million Years Old: Study shows older than our brain

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,486
Daps
26,223
The eyes are one of our most remarkable and precious organs, yet their origins have been shrouded in mystery until quite recently, said Professor Trevor Lamb of the Australian National University and The Vision Centre.

The deep origins of 'sight' go back more than 700 million years when Earth was inhabited only by single-celled amoeba-like animals, algae, corals and bacteria. At this time the first light-sensitive chemicals, known as opsins, made their appearance and were used in rudimentary ways by some organisms to sense day from night.

Ancient cells already had signalling cascades that sensed chemicals in their environment, and the advent of opsins allowed them to sense light. "But these animals were tiny, and had no nervous system to process signals from their light sensors," he said.

Over the following 200 million years those simple light-sensitive cells and their opsins slowly and progressively became better at detecting light - they became more sensitive, faster, and more reliable - until around 500 million years ago they already closely resembled the cone cells of our present day eyes.


"Our type of eye — a single globe packing in millions of photoreceptors — first starts to emerge between 500 and 600 million years ago. This was the crucial moment for our vision system," Lamb said in a recently published scientific review in ScienceDirect.

"Baby sea squirts have a simple eyespot called an ocellus, which is basically a bundle of photoreceptors. The adult animal loses this, as it becomes immobile, so vision is not important. This organ appears to date back at least 600 million years.

The hagfish has a patch of translucent skin on each side of the head where you'd expect to see its eyes, and buried beneath are a pair of very simple 'eyes' with light sensing cells and a simple optic nerve — but no muscles, lens or iris. Hagfish ancestors go back more than half a billion years, so this crude light sensing organ seems to have been the start of something big," he said.

Lampreys also appeared around 500 million years ago, and have a pair of camera-style eyes similar to our own. These appear to be direct forerunners of the vertebrate eye, which we have inherited through our fish ancestry, said Lamb.

"From this we can say that the vertebrate-style eye has been around at least 500 million years — and although its light-sensors and signalling systems are very similar to those of insects and other invertebrates, its optical system evolved quite independently from the insect-style eye with its many facets," he said.









http://www.indiatimes.com/technology/science/eyes-are-500-million-years-old-study-92221.html

Oh yeah and I found this in the Indian Times :troll:
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
Vision is something crazy when you start thinking about it in depth. Even the fact that the light we absorb in our eyes to form that image is flipped upside down and our brains have to interpret it to make it look "right" to us. Even have cases where people are given special glasses to make the image they see inverted and they eventually adapt to the upside down image to go about learning how to re-do things like ride bikes, write, etc..
 

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,746
Yep. I would say that most of the more retarded creepies and crawlies have WAY more developed and sensitive ocular structures than brains. Not surprising, i'd imagine being blind is pretty shyt in a darwinian environment.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
7,306
Reputation
-710
Daps
9,395
Reppin
me
one time I got dumb high & started looking into everyone's eyes, amazed at how they really are the windows to one's soul
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,536
The eyes are one of our most remarkable and precious organs, yet their origins have been shrouded in mystery until quite recently, said Professor Trevor Lamb of the Australian National University and The Vision Centre.

The deep origins of 'sight' go back more than 700 million years when Earth was inhabited only by single-celled amoeba-like animals, algae, corals and bacteria. At this time the first light-sensitive chemicals, known as opsins, made their appearance and were used in rudimentary ways by some organisms to sense day from night.

Ancient cells already had signalling cascades that sensed chemicals in their environment, and the advent of opsins allowed them to sense light. "But these animals were tiny, and had no nervous system to process signals from their light sensors," he said.

Over the following 200 million years those simple light-sensitive cells and their opsins slowly and progressively became better at detecting light - they became more sensitive, faster, and more reliable - until around 500 million years ago they already closely resembled the cone cells of our present day eyes.


"Our type of eye — a single globe packing in millions of photoreceptors — first starts to emerge between 500 and 600 million years ago. This was the crucial moment for our vision system," Lamb said in a recently published scientific review in ScienceDirect.

"Baby sea squirts have a simple eyespot called an ocellus, which is basically a bundle of photoreceptors. The adult animal loses this, as it becomes immobile, so vision is not important. This organ appears to date back at least 600 million years.

The hagfish has a patch of translucent skin on each side of the head where you'd expect to see its eyes, and buried beneath are a pair of very simple 'eyes' with light sensing cells and a simple optic nerve — but no muscles, lens or iris. Hagfish ancestors go back more than half a billion years, so this crude light sensing organ seems to have been the start of something big," he said.

Lampreys also appeared around 500 million years ago, and have a pair of camera-style eyes similar to our own. These appear to be direct forerunners of the vertebrate eye, which we have inherited through our fish ancestry, said Lamb.

"From this we can say that the vertebrate-style eye has been around at least 500 million years — and although its light-sensors and signalling systems are very similar to those of insects and other invertebrates, its optical system evolved quite independently from the insect-style eye with its many facets," he said.


http://www.indiatimes.com/technology/science/eyes-are-500-million-years-old-study-92221.html

Oh yeah and I found this in the Indian Times :troll:

Lord of the ring mythical ass scientists :heh: The computer monitor came before the computer. :rudy:
 
Last edited:

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,486
Daps
26,223
Lord of the ring mythical ass scientists :heh: The computer monitor came before the computer. :rudy:

I mean, I thought this at first.... but they back the shyt up.

Plus this is pro evolution because many religious people use the eyes as an attacking point at Darwinian evolution.... also scientist are saying multiple lineages, thread i made about no first eve... last year science too so many L's wiht forced opinions, so this year since feb they've been hitting with madd studies n shyt.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Lord of the ring mythical ass scientists :heh: The computer monitor came before the computer. :rudy:


Their explanation makes perfect sense. Look at the rest of the natural world. There are creatures that "think" (obviously nowhere near and nothing like human intelligence) but don't have brains, too, just some primitive nerve network. Don't hype up the brain too much. The navigation of sensory stimuli is more important than any kind of advanced thinking for those kinds of creatures, and probably just in general.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,018
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,476
Reppin
Brooklyn
I mean, I thought this at first.... but they back the shyt up.

Plus this is pro evolution because many religious people use the eyes as an attacking point at Darwinian evolution.... also scientist are saying multiple lineages, thread i made about no first eve... last year science too so many L's wiht forced opinions, so this year since feb they've been hitting with madd studies n shyt.

kind of destroys the idea of earth being 10,000 years old huh?

not in caves or on the ocean floor where most life probably lives
you mean where cac live
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,536
I mean, I thought this at first.... but they back the shyt up.

Plus this is pro evolution because many religious people use the eyes as an attacking point at Darwinian evolution.... also scientist are saying multiple lineages, thread i made about no first eve... last year science too so many L's wiht forced opinions, so this year since feb they've been hitting with madd studies n shyt.

Eyes don't exist without a central nervous system to process it
Their explanation makes perfect sense. Look at the rest of the natural world. There are creatures that "think" (obviously nowhere near and nothing like human intelligence) but don't have brains, too, just some primitive nerve network. Don't hype up the brain too much. The navigation of sensory stimuli is more important than any kind of advanced thinking for those kinds of creatures, and probably just in general.

Eyes can't be called eyes if they are procesing images for some sort of "nerve network" as you are mentioning. In that case, then any piece of concave translucent material with a proportionally equidistand focus/foci can be considered an eye. That would be like saying the elbow came before the arm.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Eyes can't be called eyes if they are procesing images for some sort of "nerve network" as you are mentioning. In that case, then any piece of concave translucent material with a proportionally equidistand focus/foci can be considered an eye. That would be like saying the elbow came before the arm.

Who says they can't be called eyes, since clearly simpler light-processing perceptual systems are related to and perform the same functions as our more complex eyes? The vast majority of scientists certainly have no problem with that.
 
Top