Eric Holder Says DOJ Will Let Washington, Colorado Marijuana Laws Go Into Effect

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,644
Reputation
4,879
Daps
68,567
WASHINGTON -- The United States government took a historic step back from its long-running drug war on Thursday, when Attorney General Eric Holder informed the governors of Washington and Colorado that the Department of Justice would allow the states to create a regime that would regulate and implement the ballot initiatives that legalized the use of marijuana for adults.

A Justice Department official said that Holder told the governors in a joint phone call early Thursday afternoon that the department would take a "trust but verify approach" to the state laws. DOJ is reserving its right to file a preemption lawsuit at a later date, since the states' regulation of marijuana is illegal under the Controlled Substances Act.

Deputy Attorney General James Cole also issued a three-and-a-half page memo to U.S. attorneys across the country. "The Department's guidance in this memorandum rests on its expectation that states and local governments that have enacted laws authorizing marijuana-related conduct will implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health and other law enforcement interests," it reads. "A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice."

The memo also outlines eight priorities for federal prosecutors enforcing marijuana laws. According to the guidance, DOJ will still prosecute individuals or entities to prevent:

  • the distribution of marijuana to minors;
  • revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels;
  • the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states;
  • state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity;
  • violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana
  • drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use;
  • growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands;
  • preventing marijuana possession or use on federal property.
The eight high-priority areas leave prosecutors bent on targeting marijuana businesses with a fair amount of leeway, especially the exception for "adverse public health consequences." And prosecutors have shown a willingness to aggressively interpret DOJ guidance in the past, as the many medical marijuana dispensary owners now behind bars can attest.

U.S. Attorneys will individually be responsible for interpreting the guidelines and how they apply to a case they intend to prosecute. A Justice Department official said, for example, that a U.S Attorney could go after marijuana distributors who used cartoon characters in their marketing because that could be interpreted as attempting to distribute marijuana to minors.

But the official stressed that the guidance was not optional, and that prosecutors would no longer be allowed to use the sheer volume of sales or the for-profit status of an operation as triggers for prosecution, though these factors could still affect their prosecutorial decisions.

The Obama administration has struggled with the legalization of medical marijuana in several states. Justice Department Officials had instructed federal prosecutors across the country not to focus federal resources on individuals who were complying with state laws regarding the use of medical marijuana. But the U.S. attorneys in several states that had legalized medical marijuana rebelled, and what was known as the Ogden memo faced stiff resistance from career prosecutors.

"That's just not what they do,” one former Justice official told HuffPost. “They prosecute people."

As a result of the internal pushback at DOJ, a new memo was issued by Deputy Attorney General James Cole in 2011 that gave U.S. attorneys more cover to go after medical marijuana distributors. Federal prosecutors began threatening local government officials with prosecution if they went forward with legislation regulating medical cannabis.

After recreational marijuana initiatives passed in Washington and Colorado in November, President Barack Obama said the federal government had “bigger fish to fry” and would not make going after marijuana users a priority.

Holder said back in December that the federal response to the passage of the state ballot measures would be coming “relatively soon.”

Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson told HuffPost his office was preparing for the “worst-case scenario” of a federal lawsuit against the law.

Holder coming his senses :wow:
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,644
Reputation
4,879
Daps
68,567
He doesn't deserve any props for this. This should go without saying.
When you have people like Kennedy in your own party fighting back against you, you at least deserve a slight pat on the back.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,750
When you have people like Kennedy in your own party fighting back against you, you at least deserve a slight pat on the back.
Other than Patrick Kennedy what Dems want the DOJ to bust up CO and WA? Certainly not a majority.

A good number of people in his party are against a lot of aggressive "anti-terrorism" actions he's taking and that doesn't stop him. Nah he gets no props.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,644
Reputation
4,879
Daps
68,567
Other than Patrick Kennedy what Dems want the DOJ to bust up CO and WA? Certainly not a majority.

A good number of people in his party are against a lot of aggressive "anti-terrorism" actions he's taking and that doesn't stop him. Nah he gets no props.
There are enough voices. But just because you do something that is common sense doesn't mean you don't get props, this is DC we're talking about and a coward ass democratic party at that.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,943
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
That checklist that Holder will have his prosecutors working from looks to me like enough of a gray area for them to continue harassing weed distributors in states where marijuana is legal.
So fukk Eric Holder.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,644
Reputation
4,879
Daps
68,567
Yeah, I'm not givin any feds props....:beli:
I can't rock with you on this at all and I usually do. I ripped Holder the most when the feds first decided to prosecute this last year. So basically you have the states moving to decriminalize marijuana, an AG for the first time in (basically forever) saying, :manny: but we will go after these specific circumstances, and that gets NO props. That sounds backwards. He should get props for breaking the trend alone...when literally last year the DOJ said they're going to prosecute these people regardless. Less than a YEAR ago. I had entirely given up on them in this area. There's a difference between being cautiously semi-optimistic (like I am) and just straight acting like it's insignificant just because you don't like the person who delivered the memo. We're not going to flip from the War on Drugs to the War on Poverty like Pac said overnight. He's let me down a lot, but he gets at least a :ehh: for this one.
 
Top