Epstein Thread: His brother says Barr cover up; Scumbag Alan Dershowitz asked Trump to pardon Maxwell; Epstein commits suicide! :damn:

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,793
Daps
112,536
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Cotdamn. Comment in ZeroHedge from poster named Valhallawarrior .
  • This gone require you to do some tracking, unless someone wants to screenshot it.
  • I saw it...it's right there in middle southern part of the island :wow:....cotdamn infant's face drawn on the clock.
Before SHTF, Let's Revisit Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book

" VALHALLAWARRIOR 10 minutes ago
You guys know that Mr Epstein has a baby face construction on his Island right?

Google "little saint james island" and go to google earth and zoom in on the big clock structure and you can CLEARLY see a the outlines of a baby face. This is not about "underage 17yo girls"... the elites do baby's....

There are or were (theve been demolished) also Egyptian illuminati symbols everywhere... "
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
79,575
Reputation
10,915
Daps
314,569
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Cotdamn. Comment in ZeroHedge from poster named Valhallawarrior .
  • This gone require you to do some tracking, unless someone wants to screenshot it.
  • I saw it...it's right there in middle southern part of the island :wow:....cotdamn infant's face drawn on the clock.
Before SHTF, Let's Revisit Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book

" VALHALLAWARRIOR 10 minutes ago
You guys know that Mr Epstein has a baby face construction on his Island right?

Google "little saint james island" and go to google earth and zoom in on the big clock structure and you can CLEARLY see a the outlines of a baby face. This is not about "underage 17yo girls"... the elites do baby's....

There are or were (theve been demolished) also Egyptian illuminati symbols everywhere... "
I just saw that shyt too :ohhh:

Epstein ain’t designated a level 3 sex offender for nothing
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,651
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,798
Reppin
The Deep State
:ALERTRED:

FYI Vicki Ward wrote the original 2003 vanity fair piece on him :whoo: The Talented Mr. Epstein







:weebaynanimated:

Jeffrey Epstein’s Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight

Jeffrey Epstein’s Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight
How did the New York financier stay nearly untouchable for decades? Vicky Ward—who has reported extensively on Epstein, on efforts to rehabilitate him—finds out what’s changed.
Updated 07.09.19 7:55AM ET / Published 07.09.19 4:35AM ET

A couple of years ago, I was interviewing a former senior White House official when the name Jeffrey Epstein came up.

Unaware of my personal history with Epstein, this person assured me that the New York financier was no serious harm to anyone. He was a good guy. A charming guy. Useful, too. He knew a lot of rich Arabs, including the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, and, further, he had clever ideas about creating bond issues for them. “OK, so he has a girl problem,” this person threw on, almost as an afterthought.

Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2008, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary.
The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

And so, it seemed—until the news of Epstein’s arrest on Saturday for allegedly trafficking minors—thus continued a pattern of blatant exceptionalism that surrounded him, and his social and business nexus.

For almost two decades, for some nebulous reason, whether to do with ties to foreign intelligence, his billions of dollars, or his social connections, Epstein, whose alleged sexual sickness and horrific assaults on women without means or ability to protect themselves is well-known in his circle, remained untouchable.

As many people know, I spent many months on his trail in 2002 for Vanity Fairand discovered not only that he was not who he claimed to be professionally, but also that he had allegedly assaulted two young sisters, one of whom had been underage at the time. Very bravely, they were prepared to go on the record. They were afraid he’d use all his influence to discredit them—and their fear turned out to be legitimate.

As the article was being readied for publication, Epstein made a visit to the office of Vanity Fair’s then-editor, Graydon Carter, and suddenly the women and their allegations were removed from the article. “He’s sensitive about the young women,” Carter told me at the time. He also mentioned he’d finagled a photograph of Epstein in a swimsuit out of the encounter. And there was also some feeble excuse about the article “being stronger as a business story.” (Epstein had also leaned heavily on my ex-husband’s uncle, Conrad Black, to try to exert his influence on me, which was particularly unwelcome, given that Black happened to be my ex-husband’s boss at the time.)

But much worse was to come from Epstein’s army of willfully blind lobbyists. In 2007 and 2008, as the FBI prepared a 53-page indictment that would charge Epstein with sex crimes, Epstein’s powerful legal team played the influence card.

After the one meeting with then-U.S. Attorney Acosta, where presumably “intelligence” was mentioned, the indictment was shelved and, instead, Epstein signed a non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors, pleading guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of procurement of minors for prostitution,
which earned him a cushy 13 months in county jail, from where he was allowed to leave to work at his office and go for walks.

The deal granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators.” Most significantly, federal prosecutors agreed to keep the deal secret from Epstein’s victims, which meant they would not know to challenge it in court. As it turned out, this actually broke the law, because victims have a right to know of such developments, according to the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.


We, the public, had access to all this information as it played out over the years in plain sight. And yet the outrage just was not there. After his absurdly soft jail time, Epstein carried on as before. He shamelessly wandered the streets of New York accompanied by startlingly young looking foreign women. People in his social set still tell me how “brilliant” he is and phone him for financial advice. A few years ago the journalist Michael Wolff wrote a profile of him for New Yorkmagazine that was meant to “rehabilitate” Epstein’s image and would tell of all the billionaires who still, secretly, hung out with Epstein. The piece had “fact-checking” issues and never ran. Even so, the notion that it was considered is mind-boggling.

So kudos, then, to the Miami Herald journalist Julie K. Brown, who many years after the fact went back and interviewed some of Epstein’s alleged victims in her brilliant three-part series “Perversion of Justice.” It was Brown who told the stories of teenagers in trailer parks outside Palm Beach who needed money for shoes or just to live, who went to give Epstein massages and so much more. Brown and her editors actually took the women seriously.

It was that heart-wrenching series that caught the attention of Congress. Ben Sasse, the Republican senator from Nebraska, joined with his Democratic colleagues and demanded to know how justice had been so miscarried.

Given the political sentiment, it’s unsurprising that the FBI should feel newly emboldened to investigate Epstein—basing some of their work on Brown’s excellent reporting.

The story in the indictment that was unsealed earlier Monday was eerily familiar to all of us who have been paying attention to Epstein’s sick story. What is different, finally, after 16 years, is the reaction, which is, at last, appropriate.

One of the young women who spoke to me 16 years ago emailed Monday evening. “Shocked and elated,” she said. “Fingers crossed they all finally go down.” Amen to that.
 
Last edited:

Walgreens

Be Well.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,595
Reputation
2,770
Daps
68,552
A billionaire(?) paedophile being brought down? Something EXTRAORDINARY must be going on behind the scenes. Who ordered this domino knocked over?
Yeah, this seems like we're living in a dream world. Hard to believe this is happening. Put a bullet in his head and in the head of anyone else cosigning, defending, deflecting or involved in all of that.

Waiting for the catch/out though...
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,082
Reputation
6,804
Daps
143,697
Reppin
CookoutGang
Guess who un recused himself :mjpls:
From my knowledge he only recused himself from the Miami stuff and never recused himself from the SDNY investigation. I don't really care. If he wants to muddy the waters here in defense of a pedophile go for it. Dems need to put him on the summerjam screen for being a pedo protector.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,793
Daps
112,536
Reppin
In the Silver Lining

Why the hell am I getting low quality warning points for a link to an article, related to the thread topic?? :dahell:

Did the mod happen to at least click the link, before they handed out another warning point? This is a real law being proposed by real Congresspeople

  • Congress is aiming to halt child porn distribution within Pentagon networks according to a bipartisan bill (The End Network Abuse Act) that was introduced by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.)
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,082
Reputation
6,804
Daps
143,697
Reppin
CookoutGang
Why the hell am I getting low quality warning points for a link to an article, related to the thread topic?? :dahell:

  • Congress is aiming to halt child porn distribution within Pentagon networks according to a bipartisan bill (The End Network Abuse Act) that was introduced by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.)

What does that have to do with this?

I'm starting to notice you get boner over this pedo shyt. :mjtf:
 
Top