Eddy Grant drags Trump across Electric Avenue

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,604
Reputation
14,534
Daps
201,618
Reppin
Above the fray.
Billboard


Twitter Removes Pres. Trump Campaign Video After Eddy Grant 'Electric Avenue' Infringement Lawsuit
9/3/2020
Eddy-Grant-2009-london-billboard-1548-1598965675-768x508.jpg

Hayley Madden/Redferns
Eddy Grant performs on stage at O2 Arena on Dec. 12, 2009 in London.

Take down "does not diminish the damages that were already sustained," lawyer says.
Twitter has removed a campaign video for Pres. Donald Trump's that is the subject of a copyright infringement lawsuit from "Electric Avenue" singer Eddy Grant first reported by Billboard on Tuesday (Sept. 1). The action came on the same day that attorney Brian Caplan of Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt LLC filed the suit in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York, claiming that the clip denigrating Trump's White House rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, illegally made use of Grants signature 1983 hit "Electric Avenue" without permission.

"Twitter’s take down of the infringing video does not diminish the damages that were already sustained by the wrongful conduct at issue," Caplan tells Billboard in a statement. "President Trump tweeted the infringing video to millions of his followers, and the tweet was re-tweeted many times. President Trump can admonish China for not respecting U.S. intellectual property law while he simultaneously infringes U.S. copyright law on a regular basis."


The suit is tied to a bizarre animated ad posted on Twitter by Trump's campaign on Aug. 12 which depicts a cartoon version of Democrat Biden driving an old-fashioned train car while a speeding train that says "Trump Pence" and "KAG 2020" zips through a desolate town.

There is no context for the use of the song, which plays as the animated Biden hand-pumps his way through the empty streets in a handcar labeled "Biden President: Your Hair Smells Terrific" while random snippets of old quotes and interviews are played. The lyrics of the song, which include the lines, "Down in the streets there is violence/ And a lot of work to be done," were written by the Black Guyanese-British singer .

Caplan earlier told Billboard that another attorney for Grant, Wallace Collins III, sent a cease and desist letter to the president's attorney asking that the 55-second video be taken down the day after the clip was posted. "You need to get a synchronization license when you sync music to video," Caplan said, noting that Grant owns the master recording and was not asked for permission to use the song, which the suit stresses has a "valid and subsisting" copyright.

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign has not responded to multiple requests for comment.


===========================================================================
However, the song "Electric Avenue" is by Black Guyanese-British artist Eddy Grant and it is about the 1981 Brixton race riots in London when the eponymous street became a site of upheaval and violence.

electric_avenue_street_sign_875_1.jpg

"Electric Avenue" is from Grant's 1982 album Killer on the Rampage, written in response to what is also known as the Brixton uprising.



The disturbances took place in the mostly African-Caribbean community in the south London neighborhood due to growing tensions from high unemployment, poor housing, and high crime rates. Tensions were further stoked by rumors of young Black men being treated unfairly by the police.

eddy-grant.jpg

SUIKERROCK FESTIVAL: Eddy Grant performing on stage at Suikerrock Festival in Belgium. Didier Messens/Redferns/Getty
According to reports from the BBC, around 300 officers and 65 members of the public were injured, over the three-day riots, in what has become one of the city's worst modern-day disorders.

Grant spoke about how "Electric Avenue" came to be in a 2018 interview with The Guardian.

"Just before leaving England, I'd watched the Brixton riots unfold on television," the now 72-year-old wrote. "I'd seen the Notting Hill riots starting a few years previously. I wrote down: 'Now in the street there is violence,' and the song just flowed from there. I had been talking to politicians and people at a high level about the lack of opportunity for Black people, and I knew what was brewing."


Grant added: "The general attitude was: 'Oh come on, Eddy, you mean rivers of blood?' I myself might have been successful, but I could have easily been one of those guys with no hope, and I knew that when people felt they were being left behind, there was potential for violence. The song was intended as a wake-up call."

Having already reached number two in the U.K. singles chart after its initial release in 1983, the song became a hit in the U.S., spending five weeks at No. 2 on Billboard Magazine's Hot 100 charts.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,604
Reputation
14,534
Daps
201,618
Reppin
Above the fray.
UPDATE OCT 2021


Trump loses bid to escape 'Electric Avenue' copyright lawsuit
https://www.reuters.com/authors/blake-brittain/
IOTREGFFY5MZTGMOWVDYDYXHDI.jpg

Reggae star Eddy Grant performs as part of his "Reparation" tour in Durban February 22, 2009. REUTERS/Rogan Ward



(Reuters) - Former Republican President Donald Trump must face copyright claims brought by "Electric Avenue" musician Eddy Grant over Trump's alleged misuse of his song on a video he posted to Twitter, a Manhattan federal court ruled Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge John Koeltl said Trump and his campaign hadn't proven at an early stage of the case that a 55-second anti-Biden video he tweeted last year during the run-up to the 2020 presidential election made fair use of Grant's song under federal copyright law.

Koeltl also said the fair-use factors all favor Grant at this stage.

Grant wrote, recorded, and produced the 1983 hit song "Electric Avenue," which reached number two on the Billboard Hot 100 chart and went platinum in the U.S.

The video Trump posted didn't "parody the music or transform it in any way," and its "overarching political purpose" didn't automatically make it transformative or non-commercial, Koeltl said.

Grant's attorney Brian Caplan of Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt said in an email that he was "very pleased" with the ruling.

"There is no justification under existing copyright law for a politician to simply appropriate a popular recording and synchronize it in an unrelated video for ostensibly a commercial purpose, cloaked as a political advertisement," Caplan said.

Trump's attorneys Darren Saunders of Peroff Saunders and Ken Caruso of Mukasey Frenchman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Grant sued Trump last September over a video Trump posted to his personal Twitter account in August. The animated video, made by someone unaffiliated with the Trump campaign, features a high-speed red train with Trump's name contrasted with a slow-moving Biden handcart, and uses 40 seconds of Grant's song.

Trump moved to dismiss the case in November shortly after the election, arguing he made fair use of the song.

The video was a "transformative, non-commercial work," used a minimal amount of the song, and didn't affect Grant's market for it, Trump argued.

Koeltl rejected Trump's argument at the dismissal stage of the case, but said he could re-raise it in a summary-judgment motion.

Trump's use of the song wasn't protected as satire or political commentary because it didn't "use Electric Avenue as a vehicle to deliver its satirical message, and it makes no effort to poke fun at the song or Grant," Koeltl said.

Instead, Koeltl said it's "best described as a wholesale copying of music to accompany a political campaign ad."

"Nothing about the song was integral to the video's political message, which is conveyed by the animation" and "unflattering excerpts" of a Biden speech, Koeltl said.

The fact that the song was unedited, played for over two-thirds of the video, and was "instantly recognizable" in it also weighed in Grant's favor.

Koeltl also said that Trump's use of the song could harm Grant's market for licensing it.

"Widespread, uncompensated use of Grant's music in promotional videos – political or otherwise – would embolden would-be infringers and undermine Grant's ability to obtain compensation in exchange for licensing his music," Koeltl said.

The case is Grant v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:20-cv-07103.
 

Tribal Outkast

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
31,788
Reputation
4,025
Daps
96,821
UPDATE OCT 2021


Trump loses bid to escape 'Electric Avenue' copyright lawsuit
IOTREGFFY5MZTGMOWVDYDYXHDI.jpg

Reggae star Eddy Grant performs as part of his "Reparation" tour in Durban February 22, 2009. REUTERS/Rogan Ward



(Reuters) - Former Republican President Donald Trump must face copyright claims brought by "Electric Avenue" musician Eddy Grant over Trump's alleged misuse of his song on a video he posted to Twitter, a Manhattan federal court ruled Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge John Koeltl said Trump and his campaign hadn't proven at an early stage of the case that a 55-second anti-Biden video he tweeted last year during the run-up to the 2020 presidential election made fair use of Grant's song under federal copyright law.

Koeltl also said the fair-use factors all favor Grant at this stage.

Grant wrote, recorded, and produced the 1983 hit song "Electric Avenue," which reached number two on the Billboard Hot 100 chart and went platinum in the U.S.

The video Trump posted didn't "parody the music or transform it in any way," and its "overarching political purpose" didn't automatically make it transformative or non-commercial, Koeltl said.

Grant's attorney Brian Caplan of Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt said in an email that he was "very pleased" with the ruling.

"There is no justification under existing copyright law for a politician to simply appropriate a popular recording and synchronize it in an unrelated video for ostensibly a commercial purpose, cloaked as a political advertisement," Caplan said.

Trump's attorneys Darren Saunders of Peroff Saunders and Ken Caruso of Mukasey Frenchman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Grant sued Trump last September over a video Trump posted to his personal Twitter account in August. The animated video, made by someone unaffiliated with the Trump campaign, features a high-speed red train with Trump's name contrasted with a slow-moving Biden handcart, and uses 40 seconds of Grant's song.

Trump moved to dismiss the case in November shortly after the election, arguing he made fair use of the song.

The video was a "transformative, non-commercial work," used a minimal amount of the song, and didn't affect Grant's market for it, Trump argued.

Koeltl rejected Trump's argument at the dismissal stage of the case, but said he could re-raise it in a summary-judgment motion.

Trump's use of the song wasn't protected as satire or political commentary because it didn't "use Electric Avenue as a vehicle to deliver its satirical message, and it makes no effort to poke fun at the song or Grant," Koeltl said.

Instead, Koeltl said it's "best described as a wholesale copying of music to accompany a political campaign ad."

"Nothing about the song was integral to the video's political message, which is conveyed by the animation" and "unflattering excerpts" of a Biden speech, Koeltl said.

The fact that the song was unedited, played for over two-thirds of the video, and was "instantly recognizable" in it also weighed in Grant's favor.

Koeltl also said that Trump's use of the song could harm Grant's market for licensing it.

"Widespread, uncompensated use of Grant's music in promotional videos – political or otherwise – would embolden would-be infringers and undermine Grant's ability to obtain compensation in exchange for licensing his music," Koeltl said.

The case is Grant v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:20-cv-07103.
Out in the street!:blessed:
 
Top