Drake Initiates Legal Action Against UMG

jerzboy

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
7,151
Reputation
938
Daps
23,121
Reppin
NULL
He’s basically done with this Deal he released CLB, Honestly Nevermind, Her Loss and For All the Dogs plus the tours he’s done recently that grossed $320 million, UMG sabotaging to fukk up his next deal. There’s going to be a lot of shyt revealed in the coming months.

The Gamma Deal and 100 Gigs was the beginning of the end for Drake UMG.

Now all these artists linking up to go at him makes sense. We still don’t know the reasons.


This Twitter handle is banned in the coli but there’s explanation.

This makes the most sense
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,200
Daps
620,153
Reppin
The Deep State
And you sincerely believe they didn't do the same exact things for him?

Why didnt he speak up then?


Oh cause we know why already
Again, if you have a deal to get exclusive promotion, thats OK. If you BROKE CONTRACTS TO DO THAT FOR OTHERS THAT DID NOT HAVE THOSE CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS, THAT IS ILLEGAL.

I dont know why I need to explain this to you.
 

Tetris v2.0

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
13,672
Reputation
3,572
Daps
46,572
That's one way to leave your "historic" record deal

This new era of Drake is going to be something lol
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,684
Reputation
11,987
Daps
374,617
Reppin
CHICAGO



"Drake’s attorneys claim that UMG carried out its “scheme” in a variety of ways, including by charging Spotify vastly reduced licensing rates in exchange for the streamer recommending the song to users who had searched for “unrelated songs and artists.” They also claim UMG paid influencers to boost the song on social media and also hired armies of bots to fraudulently spike the numbers.

“UMG … conspired with and paid currently unknown parties to use ‘bots’ to artificially inflate the spread of ‘Not Like Us’ and deceive consumers into believing the song was more popular than it was in reality,” Drake’s lawyers write."

:patrice: I DONT THINK
HE WOULD BE GOING UP
AGAINST A CONGLOMERATE LIKE THIS
IF HE DIDN'T HAVE PROOF.

HES OBVIOUSLY GOING
TO HAVE TO PRESENT EVIDENCE IN COURT

:devil:
:evil:
 
Top