I mean if they paid him 400ms and he recouped and now he coming back for 600ms honestly if I’m UMG ain’t trying to pay that nikka either
I mean if they paid him 400ms and he recouped and now he coming back for 600ms honestly if I’m UMG ain’t trying to pay that nikka either
I asked Siri to play Certified Lover Boy and it played…Certified Lover Boy.
Aubrey and the Owelettes are in hell
Over 200 posts to complainThe fact people keep saying he’s “suing kendrick” is why drake should probably just continue to ignore the talking heads. Theres no incentive to pretending to get a fair shake in the media anymore.
Over 200 posts to complainThe fact people keep saying he’s “suing kendrick” is why drake should probably just continue to ignore the talking heads. Theres no incentive to pretending to get a fair shake in the media anymore.
YesIf Drake had concrete evidence wouldn't there be lawsuit instead of a petition???
if the logic is that they saw him recoup 400m real quick, why would they be afraid of 600m if his history shows that he'll knock that out real quick too? you don't kill the career of someone capable of making you 600m+.If you don’t understand business then that’s on you
They have budgets.. why tie up that much money in 1 person when they can get back a bigger return on someone whom they invested a small amount in?if the logic is that they saw him recoup 400m real quick, why would they be afraid of 600m if his history shows that he'll knock that out real quick too? you don't kill the career of someone capable of making you 600m+.
Difference being that Kendrick won’t counter-sue because there’s real paperwork attached.Didn't Drake call him a woman beater with out any proof? You nikkas that limp wristed?
ahh i see so kendrick won't sue over that because he ain't a bytch, it's because drake has the proof.Difference being that Kendrick won’t counter-sue because there’s real paperwork attached.