Dr. Frances Cress Welsing on the Donahue Show in 1985/ * Donahue passes away

invalid

Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
19,972
Reputation
6,797
Daps
80,752
That was a good show. I just sat and watched all of it.

I'm struck at how they could even have this type of conversation and everyone can give their input and although may disagree still remain civil. We can say a lot about the older generations but, by God, they certainly weren't like our current overly emotional, overly pc, cancel-happy generation of perpetual im-matures that we're dealing with today.

There has been something that has been bothering me about this whole conversation around Nick Cannon. Everybody has been so quick to denounce the views, or denounce Farrakhan, or the NOI as black supremacist or anti-semetic, and no one prominent in the discussion has asked where does this rhetoric come from and why?

Dr. Welsing summarized it so succinctly in the video - there are two ways we can tackle white supremacy a) white people need to become comfortable with being white and being a minority or b) black people should stop thinking white people will voluntarily commit genetic suicide, and in that expectation, like in chess, we need to play the black side of the chess board.

This conversation is missing the fact that the rhetoric that Nick Cannon was trying to articulate is born out of blacks trying to play the black side of the chess board.

Us being pushed to play both offense and defense.

Which is why I may not agree with much of the rhetoric, but I will always respect it because I know the long game. And I agree with the long game. Justice.

I'm sure you've seen the conversation in the other Nick Cannon thread where I mentioned Julius Rosenwald and another poster dropped a quote of his that either he or I didn't understand. The quote was something to the extent of him not being concerned with equality for blacks but that justice for blacks must be attained by any and all measures. The other poster saw "not interested in equality for blacks" and stopped there, but the latter portion of that quote was the most significant, which was the attainment of justice by all measures, because that, according to Dr. Welsing, will start the process of dismantling the system of white supremacy.

I thought she was very logical in her presentation.

I think I counted maybe only three audience members who actually spoke that had the capacity to entertain what she was saying.

One was the black woman who cited the study of the remains of the oldest human in Africa. She was very well-spoken.

The other was the white woman who admitted that that Dr. Welsing actually presented a fair case but she would lose a lot of *white* people talking about chocolates and bowling balls. And although I think she missed Welsing's point about the subconsciousness and the meanings behind symbols, it highlights the very present problem with afrocentrics and their ability to mix serious scholarship with conspiracies and why many people today don't take "hoteps" seriously.

In actuality, the show was pretty funny and at first you get the feeling that the host was making a mockery of her but as it progresses you can tell that he actually respects her and her points even if he disagrees.

Donahue makes a good point, especially to the black audience members who got emotional about the elder white lady admitting that she was racist. This is where our emotion hurts us. We can't engage in a conversation if we can't be ok with people being honest.

And I like how Dr. Welsing checked "Ms. Bourgie Medical Student from Massachusetts" who self-admittedly grew up middle class and got along perfectly fine with whites. Basically told her "I'm old black money, girl have a seat.":lolbron:
Funnily enough, I was in a similar conversation with Welsing's sister, Lorna Cress, only I was was "Mr. Bourgie Johnny Come-lately" and Lorna dismissed me in a similar fashion. It ended in her giving and signing my current copy of the Isis Papers. That's another story for another time.:mjlol:

One thing Dr. Welsing talked about that I don't hear too many afro-centrics talk about is self-dependency and how she related that to the black family. Basically said a black woman should not have a child before 30 and a black man before 35 and that black families should have no more than 2 children. I wonder what afro-centrics think about that?:mjgrin:

All in all, good video.
 
Last edited:

invalid

Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
19,972
Reputation
6,797
Daps
80,752
It's also funny how we can have 10+ threads over 40+ pages discussing Nick Cannon and his rhetoric but a thread about the source of his rhetoric in her own words is :snooze:.

People are more concerned with regurgitating the thoughts of their favorite youtubers or celebrities than actually getting acquainted with the source and expanding their knowledge or formulating their own opinions.
 

Counter Racist Male

Retired poster and occasional lurker
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
10,359
Reputation
1,141
Daps
25,690
Reppin
MYSELF


45 minutes. Aired in 1985, seven years before The Isis Papers was published.

Posting this to provide context for the current controversy.Many of you have seen others repeat her views/theories, but this is her speaking for herself before a national platform.



I watch this several times before. Beautiful interview.

I loved the way she handles a crowd of hostile racist suspects. I even enjoyed the way she handled the suspected white supremacist on the telephone who berated the skin color and hair texture of black people.

Notice how quickly the white crowd Spell silent when she began to reason with them on why they practice racism white supremacy.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,162
Reputation
11,545
Daps
367,922
Reppin
CHICAGO
It's also funny how we can have 10+ threads over 40+ pages discussing Nick Cannon and his rhetoric but a thread about the source of his rhetoric in her own words is :snooze:.

People are more concerned with regurgitating the thoughts of their favorite youtubers or celebrities than actually getting acquainted with the source and expanding their knowledge or formulating their own opinions.

MANY OF US HAVE NOT ONLY SEEN THE FOOTAGE BEFORE, WEVE ALSO SEEN
HER IN OTHER THINGS LIKE HIDDEN COLORS.

PPL WERE NOT DISCUSSING HER RHETORIC
IN THE NICK CANNONS THREADS
OUTSIDE THE 1ST COUPLE OF PAGES
ON THE INITIAL DAY.

HE GOT GREEN LIT OVER HIS SO CALLED
ANTI SEMETICISM...
SAYING BLACKS WERE THE REAL HEBREWS.
:devil:
:evil:

 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,125
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,244
Reppin
Above the fray.
@boy
Glad that you and others enjoyed the program. Nine times out of 10 this would have been posted in the Root section, but the Cannon controversy makes this a topic that could appeal to the general board. Im under no illusions that it will, just saying that it could.

Donahue and the nature of talk shows (tv or radio) was more about information, dicussion and exchange of viewpoints in that era. The angry confrontational wave would later infiltrate talk shows when producers saw that it brought ratings. Eventually it would take over "serious" political shows, and it's the accepted standard now across media.

Great point about no prominent voice currently addressing the root cause of the current controversy. When this type of convo last hit the mainstream, it was in the 1990s. The late John Henrik Clarke articulated it in an Op-Ed back and forth against the Henry Louis Gates. He wasn't afraid of jewish backlash, as he had confronted it first hand when he tried to incorporate AA and African history into the NYC public school curriculum and challenged european jewish history being shoe horned into that curriculum.
They tried, to no avail, to dismiss Dr. Clarke and lump him in with the new age hoteps, when his legacy and scholarship is super solid.
Dr. Clarke's views on the matter are in link below.



"a dissenting view" / dr. john henrik clarke response to henry louis gates' "black demagogues & pseudo-scholars" » Live From Planet Earth

he was responding to HLG
Opinion | Black Demagogues and Pseudo-Scholars

Modern voices are afraid of the effect it will have on their careers to get to the root of the issue.
-----
About offense and defense. Agree again. The money isn't in doing that. The money is in keeping audiences stagnant and feeding/selling them content about WS. And to convince them that they are countering WS, by subscribing,liking, donating, supporting crowdfunding. Sweet hustle.
That's why the excerpts that are taken from Dr. Welsing by YTers are only the passages about white supremacy. Her content about accountability, control of resources and reducing dependency on whites and the system never get mentioned. No money in promoting that.


----
The debate between you and that guy , and some of the things he said echo some of the comments said in the Donahue broadcast by the audience members who were upset to hear that the white woman admitted that she was racist. White people deny racism exists........people get upset. White person admits that they are racist.......people get upset. WTF????

First off, in the debate you had , the quote was brought up as a coli juelz.You mentioned jewish benefactors, he called BS.......you posted the evidence and the response was to find a quote to deflect from that.

These are the kind of evasive tactics that discourage me from taking a lot of people seriously here.
Nobody is above being wrong. You and I have a running joke where you Jason Terry gif me when I'm wrong about something. When I'm presented with facts that refutes what I said earlier, I say thanks for the correction and concede the point . This is a natural reaction to being corrected, so I will forever be puzzled when people try to wiggle, smilie, or juelz their way out of conceding an obvious point.
Because the guy was being evasive for the sake of being evasive, the full quote had no meaning to him other than using it to deflect from the evidence of the 19th century jewish benefactor directly donating to promote Black education.

--
I mentioned in a recent thread that I didn't understand the turn that Dr. Wesling took , or the motivation behind it. I'm a layperson, so I wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand what she was doing as a psychiatrist. I tend to agree with you about "by any and all means" aspect. I do think that some of the comments she made were to produce "sound bytes" and make complicated theories more accessible to laymen.
I saw a doc. about Black comedy years ago and the legend dikk Gregory said "(def jam era) comedians only saw foul language in Richard Pryor's routines and missed the political and social commentary. The hotep hustlers seemed to only have taken a cliffs notes version of Dr. Welsing's work. That's why they all get tripped up when they are pressed or asked questions about it. They don't fully understand what they are repeating. Uneducated conmen coopting her work and trivializing it is terrible.

---
3 things about Dr. Welsing delivering the Ether.
  • I laughed when the woman said she was calling from Mass. In his autobiography Malcolm X was brutal in his critique of the bourgeoisie , as represented by the Beacon Hill elite when he moved to Boston area as a teen. The caller's words sound VERBATIM the way he described that crowd.

  • The caller's either/or scenario where either you acknowledge racism or you work hard and do what you have to do is spoken like a truly sheltered person. I'm sure that woman has gotten several wakeup calls since she placed that call in 1985. When she was matched with a hospital to do her residency outside of the city she grew up in, the real world hit her.

  • The look on Dr. Wesling's face, to me, said more than her words......and she blew up the either/or scenario the caller tried to project.
"Racism is here, my grandfather was a physician, my father was a physician, I'm a physician. Black people can do many things in the presence of racism, but I don't think we can deny that it's here".
 
Last edited:

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,150
Daps
204,781
It's also funny how we can have 10+ threads over 40+ pages discussing Nick Cannon and his rhetoric but a thread about the source of his rhetoric in her own words is :snooze:.

People are more concerned with regurgitating the thoughts of their favorite youtubers or celebrities than actually getting acquainted with the source and expanding their knowledge or formulating their own opinions.

All this^^^
 

NO-BadAzz

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
10,781
Reputation
1,836
Daps
31,709
I've watched it and at least try and watch it 1 every 3 or 4 months to brush up on my intellect. The ISIS Papers should be in every black person home

Along with Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome by Dr. Joy Degruy
 
Top