DOJ’s Antitrust Division Begins Trials to Block Two Large Mergers

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
There's a lot of work being done quietly behind the scenes that doesn't get pub. With a competent DOJ I would anticipate the Big Tech companies going through some kind of probe within 10 years



United Health – Change Healthcare

The United Health trial is being conducted before Judge Carl Nichols, in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Nichols just recently competed the criminal trial of Steve Bannon for content of Congress.

DOJ is arguing that United Health’s control over Change’s business processing insurance claims and access to the claims data between insurers and health care providers will have an anti-competitive impact on the health care and insurance markets. DOJ specifically contends that the combination would give United Health a 94 percent market share over the claims-editing business, although Change has suggested it will divest its claims editing business if the merger is approved. Even aside from the claims-editing part of the business, United Health and Change are the two most significant competitors in the insurance processing market. To address the impact of United Health’s access to competitor insurance information, Change and United Health have promised to maintain information firewalls to prevent the sharing of such information across the merged entity.

a2.png

DOJ also contends that, once merged, the Change insurance processing business would be incentivized to favor United Health claims over those of competitors in an attempt to steer business to United Health medical services. Corporate documents generated about the merger included reference to a term “the U-factor,” which DOJ contends is a short-hand for the incentives that would distort effective competition in the insurance processing industry and reflects the benefits from the United Health combination.

Penguin Random House — Simon & Schuster

The Penguin Random House-Simon & Schuster trial is being conducted before Judge Florence Pan in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.

DOJ is challenging Penguin Random House’s acquisition of Simon & Schuster, claiming that the merged company will exercise too much leverage with bestselling authors for book rights. Early in the trial, DOJ called best-selling author Stephen King as a witness to support its position. King’s books are published by Simon & Schuster. King testified that “consolidation is bad for competition” in the “book business,” and that, “[t]he more companies there are, the better it is.”

a-2.jpeg

King recounted his career and business deals with numerous book publishers along the way. King described the changes in the publishing market and the stead consolidation of publishing houses during his fifty year career.

Aside from King, DOJ has presented testimony from two literary agents and Simon and Schuster’s COO and CFO, and finally its CEO. The agents both testified that the merger would result in fewer alternatives for potential literary projects promoted by their clients.

DOJ elicited testimony from Simon & Schuster’s COO and CFO concerning the availability and leverage exercised with respect to printing operations.

With the CEO, DOJ was able to demonstrate in presenting an email chain that competition between Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster increased the amount of an advance for a specific book from $5 million to $8 million. When the CEO tried to deny that Simon & Schuster’s participation in the market increased competition for book deals , DOJ impeached his testimony through statements made during his deposition.

In another email, Simon & Schuster’s CEO wrote that he did not expect that DOJ would approve Penguin Random House’s acquisition of Simon & Schuster.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,683
Reputation
6,303
Daps
64,700
Reppin
San Diego
My sister works in publishing and said the Justice lawyers are fumbling the trial, but I know criminal much more than civil, so I need to read and see for myself.
 
Top