Does the usefulness of street cams after the Boston bombing change the CISPA debate?

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,630
Daps
17,474
Why or why not?

6a011570268f42970c017eea5fc2a9970d-pi
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,114
Reputation
2,715
Daps
44,373
they weren't "street cams" that belong to local government. they're security cameras for a private business
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,630
Daps
17,474
they weren't "street cams" that belong to local government. they're security cameras for a private business

...which is not an indictment against their usefulness. In fact, if private business cameras were this useful, the government may as well just get its own cameras and cut out the middlemen.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
shyt like that depends on usage and really it is a rights issue. You can't just toss rights out the window because something MIGHT help in SOME cases (can't believe i just wrote that.)

It really is a slippery slope in terms of when you stop "protecting" citizens and start fuking over civil liberties.

If "protection" is the ultimate goal then we should all have GPS tracking chips placed in us at birth that provide detailed information about us on a daily basis, have video audio and still picture capabilities, they should be able to determine drug use and come equipped with a "tazer" like setting where if they are looking for you they click it and you just stop moving till the cops (using the GPS) come pick you up.

I mean THAT would ensure all criminals were caught...right THAT would ensure "protection" right?

Where does it stop?
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,114
Reputation
2,715
Daps
44,373
shyt like that depends on usage and really it is a rights issue. You can't just toss rights out the window because something MIGHT help in SOME cases (can't believe i just wrote that.)

It really is a slippery slope in terms of when you stop "protecting" citizens and start fuking over civil liberties.

If "protection" is the ultimate goal then we should all have GPS tracking chips placed in us at birth that provide detailed information about us on a daily basis, have video audio and still picture capabilities, they should be able to determine drug use and come equipped with a "tazer" like setting where if they are looking for you they click it and you just stop moving till the cops (using the GPS) come pick you up.

I mean THAT would ensure all criminals were caught...right THAT would ensure "protection" right?

Where does it stop?


exactly. I'm sure we could stop a lot of crime by stopping and frisking everyone, and applying airport-like security to daily life. but yeah... fukk all that
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,880
Daps
88,330
Reppin
nWg
GIVE EVERYONE A GUN WITH A CAMERA ON IT, BROTHER! PUT LITTLE CAMERAS ON THE BULLETS, DUDE!
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
:manny: This argument has already been overtaken by technology...The feds wont need street cams soon enough.....Google glass is here and apple and the others are sure to follow..might as well start getting used to the idea that anyone could be recording at anytime

welcome to the fishbowl :wow:
 
Top