The mentality of the OP and the second poster is the equivalent of "blaming the victim". While those of us who really are interested enough in politics learn through study that a president doesn't/can't have much influence on jobs or the economy in general (banks, the fed and regulatory agencies have MUCH more influence), WHEN THEY RUN FOR OFFICE THEY CONSTANTLY SELL THEMSELVES AS THE SAVIORS OF ALL THINGS ECONOMIC.
OP I'm sure there was a moment in time when YOU actually believed the president had a lot of influence on jobs, right? Atleast when you were younger I'm sure you did. So why are you blaming THE PEOPLE for being conned. . . WHY NOT BLAME THE CON ARTISTS???
You are basically giving people a free pass for being ignorant on how the govt and economy works. Bzzzzt wrong maybe next time.The mentality of the OP and the second poster is the equivalent of "blaming the victim". While those of us who really are interested enough in politics learn through study that a president doesn't/can't have much influence on jobs or the economy in general (banks, the fed and regulatory agencies have MUCH more influence), WHEN THEY RUN FOR OFFICE THEY CONSTANTLY SELL THEMSELVES AS THE SAVIORS OF ALL THINGS ECONOMIC.
OP I'm sure there was a moment in time when YOU actually believed the president had a lot of influence on jobs, right? Atleast when you were younger I'm sure you did. So why are you blaming THE PEOPLE for being conned. . . WHY NOT BLAME THE CON ARTISTS???
There are industries that drive mass job creation. They come and go. The president can't create a new direction and industry to drive the economy in.The mentality of the OP and the second poster is the equivalent of "blaming the victim". While those of us who really are interested enough in politics learn through study that a president doesn't/can't have much influence on jobs or the economy in general (banks, the fed and regulatory agencies have MUCH more influence), WHEN THEY RUN FOR OFFICE THEY CONSTANTLY SELL THEMSELVES AS THE SAVIORS OF ALL THINGS ECONOMIC.
OP I'm sure there was a moment in time when YOU actually believed the president had a lot of influence on jobs, right? Atleast when you were younger I'm sure you did. So why are you blaming THE PEOPLE for being conned. . . WHY NOT BLAME THE CON ARTISTS???
The mentality of the OP and the second poster is the equivalent of "blaming the victim". While those of us who really are interested enough in politics learn through study that a president doesn't/can't have much influence on jobs or the economy in general (banks, the fed and regulatory agencies have MUCH more influence), WHEN THEY RUN FOR OFFICE THEY CONSTANTLY SELL THEMSELVES AS THE SAVIORS OF ALL THINGS ECONOMIC.
OP I'm sure there was a moment in time when YOU actually believed the president had a lot of influence on jobs, right? Atleast when you were younger I'm sure you did. So why are you blaming THE PEOPLE for being conned. . . WHY NOT BLAME THE CON ARTISTS???