Dec 12 - The Universe Is A Hologram!!!???

Deadpool1986

Cook with a Mouth
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
5,043
Reputation
6,765
Daps
18,773
Reppin
#midnightboyz/ #Neggas-Black & White/ #TNT
2v4o.jpg

A team of physicists has provided some of the clearest evidence yet that our Universe could be just one big projection.

In 1997, theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena proposed that an audacious model of the Universe in which gravity arises from infinitesimally thin, vibrating strings could be reinterpreted in terms of well-established physics. The mathematically intricate world of strings, which exist in nine dimensions of space plus one of time, would be merely a hologram: the real action would play out in a simpler, flatter cosmos where there is no gravity.

Maldacena's idea thrilled physicists because it offered a way to put the popular but still unproven theory of strings on solid footing — and because it solved apparent inconsistencies between quantum physics and Einstein's theory of gravity. It provided physicists with a mathematical Rosetta stone, a 'duality', that allowed them to translate back and forth between the two languages, and solve problems in one model that seemed intractable in the other and vice versa. But although the validity of Maldacena's ideas has pretty much been taken for granted ever since, a rigorous proof has been elusive.

In two papers posted on the arXiv repository, Yoshifumi Hyakutake of Ibaraki University in Japan and his colleagues now provide, if not an actual proof, at least compelling evidence that Maldacena’s conjecture is true.

In one paper, Hyakutake computes the internal energy of a black hole, the position of its event horizon (the boundary between the black hole and the rest of the Universe), its entropy and other properties based on the predictions of string theory as well as the effects of so-called virtual particles that continuously pop into and out of existence. In the other, he and his collaborators calculate the internal energy of the corresponding lower-dimensional cosmos with no gravity. The two computer calculations match.

“It seems to be a correct computation,” says Maldacena, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and who did not contribute to the team's work.

The findings “are an interesting way to test many ideas in quantum gravity and string theory”, Maldacena adds. The two papers, he notes, are the culmination of a series of articles contributed by the Japanese team over the past few years. “The whole sequence of papers is very nice because it tests the dual [nature of the universes] in regimes where there are no analytic tests.”

“They have numerically confirmed, perhaps for the first time, something we were fairly sure had to be true, but was still a conjecture — namely that the thermodynamics of certain black holes can be reproduced from a lower-dimensional universe,” says Leonard Susskind, a theoretical physicist at Stanford University in California who was among the first theoreticians to explore the idea of holographic universes.

Neither of the model universes explored by the Japanese team resembles our own, Maldacena notes. The cosmos with a black hole has ten dimensions, with eight of them forming an eight-dimensional sphere. The lower-dimensional, gravity-free one has but a single dimension, and its menagerie of quantum particles resembles a group of idealized springs, or harmonic oscillators, attached to one another.

Nevertheless, says Maldacena, the numerical proof that these two seemingly disparate worlds are actually identical gives hope that the gravitational properties of our Universe can one day be explained by a simpler cosmos purely in terms of quantum theory.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/11/universe-hologram-physicists_n_4428359.html

So we really might be living in the matrix!!! :lupe:
 

Chesirecatdaddy

All Star
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
6,178
Reputation
1,073
Daps
9,014
Breh even religious books allude to the fact that the universe is not real... but a trial... simulation. I know a lot of you hate religion but spiritual teachings have been tryna teach this for thousands of years. The whole fact that without an observer nothing really exists proves that this is just an "experience"
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,607
Reppin
Los Angeles
Maybe its 2 d who knows. imagine being so small that your existence even on a flat surface like a table is filled with very deep valleys chasms and cliffs. This could make a world thats 3d seem 2d, maybe. But scientists often dont know what they're talking about so maybe this is an excuse for their incomprehension of Gods creation. :blessed:
 

Chesirecatdaddy

All Star
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
6,178
Reputation
1,073
Daps
9,014
Maybe its 2 d who knows. imagine being so small that your existence even on a flat surface like a table is filled with very deep valleys chasms and cliffs. This could make a world thats 3d seem 2d, maybe. But scientists often dont know what they're talking about so maybe this is an excuse for their incomprehension of Gods creation. :blessed:
well it's not 2d it's 3rd but if reality is actually 4 or 5d that's about the same thing you're saying. We're experiencing only a limited part of the spectrum.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,114
Reppin
The Deep State
Breh even religious books allude to the fact that the universe is not real... but a trial... simulation. I know a lot of you hate religion but spiritual teachings have been tryna teach this for thousands of years. The whole fact that without an observer nothing really exists proves that this is just an "experience"
ALLUDING to shyt is how religious people keep stretching out the relevance of their books.

Just give it up already.

These books haven't supported a damn thing they're saying.
 

Chesirecatdaddy

All Star
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
6,178
Reputation
1,073
Daps
9,014
ALLUDING to shyt is how religious people keep stretching out the relevance of their books.

Just give it up already.

These books haven't supported a damn thing they're saying.
how about you give it up breh...

you'd think I just threw up the bat signal or some shyt. Btw I said spiritual teachings not just religions. How come you don't post in any other type of topics?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,114
Reppin
The Deep State
how about you give it up breh...

you'd think I just threw up the bat signal or some shyt. Btw I said spiritual teachings not just religions. How come you don't post in any other type of topics?

because "spiritual teachings" is a vague ass meaning and infers that we're missing something.

If thats what you think, prove it.

Calling it "spiritual" is just you attempt at trying to pin down some unknown but ethereally and undefined sounding BS
 
Top