It's easy alot of people don't want to actually do the research on their own and form an opinion of their own. That would force them to think independently from the group and not feel included. So they get their information from the lowest common denominator and don't verify it but take it at face value. That's why people get their info from social media and the social media talking heads that are hustling them( i.e. Tariq) . But it all falls under the attack on education and intellectualism. Because a population that doesn't question why is a population that's easy to control. The elite don't want you to question just continue to follow directions like the good old days.
Conservative group behind Aff. Action lawsuit is now going after BW targeted VC fund/*founders respond /* co-founder steps down
- Thread starter get these nets
- Start date
The Fade
I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Good marriages, good business and good banking.
The banking part can be substituted for generational wealth which comes from the two former. And the former can come from the latter(it becomes a chicken or the egg situation) Keeps everything in-house and kills the dependency on outside institutions. Build up your skills and vocations and you can achieve these three and have something.
And gatekeep the idiots out of the process, we let the slow kids run shyt since crack and it’s not working. We let our kids idolize them and let them run podcasts that scam our community and destroy trust.
facts yeah I see that lol.
DetroitEWarren
Superstar
We don't accomplish that without ridding the system of the people who with play threaten violence to make people scared then run to the supreme court. Do you not remember Black Wall Street? Chris Ruffo is synonomous with the white people on Oklahoma that were mad that blacks moved on up.
The supreme court is done for. Nothing they do will ever benefit us and they will continue to do things that directly take away from us. We start funding black only projects from only black celebrities and wealthy blacks, the Supreme court will say it's unconstitutional.
tbh Im not even talking about black men/women , im talking about black kids. Thats the only way you fix any of this. Black women have access to lots of credit lines (see goldman sachs and all the corporate stuff they get) but a lot of it doesnt help much since it rarely trickles down to the kids, particularly the boys. Black institutions have failed black kids as a whole. There's no reason in the world why black politicans are advocating for migrants to move in an area where teenage unemployemt is high, thats dumb policy (just one of many examples).
1) Fix the Urban League and NAACP
2) Set up institutions to guide black kids (k-12) towards careers that will actually get them paid. Wether its bluecolar, engineering, construction etc.
Those institutions must be credit lines or funds for camps, seminars etc. Almost all communities do this but us
3) Then from the bottom up fix the institutions until you get to those that affect the adults
> White society has spent the past decades focusing black institutions on black women thinking it would trickley down to black kids and leave out black men. Instead its left out BOTH black men and black children. The only benefactors are the "new black" children since many of them are removed from the inner city for example.
Now we gotta share our money with them. These cacs are insane
Yeah. Black America is transforming into brazil (im not talking about the racial mixing part, im talking about the quality of living and poltiics). Black women seem to think that "divesting" will save them but instead it will just lead them to live in favela type conditions with their mixed kids, just like in brazil. Check this out:
I think they realize this, which is why they try to keep black men in the meantime since they still need the presence of black men for:
1) Getting resources from white society. Mostly by claiming that we abuse them (its why they love citing femicide rates, even though those femicide rates dont put the race of the perpatrator it just assumes its us due to proximity).
2) Resources from the top black men as a way to INITIALLY propel them forward.
>It's why, for example, Kimberly Crenshaw recently went to a confrence to protest black boys benefiting from the my brothers keeper program
. She went all the way to Europe to complain about a program that helps black boys 
. Meanwhile there are hundreds of black girls only programs such as black girls code. 
Disciplining Anti-racism: My Brother
Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, pioneering scholar in the fields of critical race theory, civil rights, and Black feminist legal theory, will present her paper at the Law Department
www.eui.eu
They did the same thing during the 1990s btw. In order to lower the violence during the early 1990s, they proposed an all black boys school to get them off the streets and into career tracks. Black women sued the program and it got canned
:
Detroit's Boys-Only Schools Facing Bias Lawsuit (Published 1991)
@Gloxina just playing her part
@The Fade Theres a scene in that documentary where her white babydaddy drives them to go strip in front of millions, it basically describes what "black america" will be like soon. Timestamp is 29:15
Last edited:
Yeah. Black America is transforming into brazil (im not talking about the racial mixing part, im talking about the quality of living and poltiics). Black women seem to think that "divesting" will save them but instead it will just lead them to live in favela type conditions with their mixed kids, just like in brazil. Check this out:
I think they realize this, which is why they try to keep black men in the meantime since they still need the presence of black men for:
1) Getting resources from white society. Mostly by claiming that we abuse them (its why they love citing femicide rates, even though those femicide rates dont put the race of the perpatrator it just assumes its us due to proximity).
2) Resources from the top black men as a way to INITIALLY propel them forward.
>It's why, for example, Kimberly Crenshaw recently went to a confrence to protest black boys benefiting from the my brothers keeper program
Disciplining Anti-racism: My Brother
Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, pioneering scholar in the fields of critical race theory, civil rights, and Black feminist legal theory, will present her paper at the Law Department
They did the same thing during the 1990s btw. In order to lower the violence during the early 1990s, they proposed an all black boys school to get them off the streets and into career tracks. Black women sued the program and it got canned
Detroit's Boys-Only Schools Facing Bias Lawsuit (Published 1991)
www.nytimes.com
@Gloxina just playing her part
Nicca hush
All the Black men who were clowning dark skinned women online —especially on Twitter— last decade were playing their part too, right?
And you mentioned Earths Kitt earlier. You conveniently didn’t mention what Sidney Poitier said about not dating/marrying Black women. Or James Earl Jones for that matter in his youth.
I don’t care if you point out how some Black women are on BS but you not gonna sit here and act like some Black men ain’t on BS. as well
It was a two way thing. Im not dark skin myself but it was both dark skin black men and dark skin black women doing that kuhnery. Then dark skin black women kicked it up a notch with all out kunnery the past 5 years. Sidney Poitier was like that bc most black actresses at the time were koonin, he was disgusted. Go read his book lol, unless you want me to post all the escapades of black actresses at the time.
The Fade
I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Yeah. Black America is transforming into brazil (im not talking about the racial mixing part, im talking about the quality of living and poltiics). Black women seem to think that "divesting" will save them but instead it will just lead them to live in favela type conditions with their mixed kids, just like in brazil. Check this out:
I think they realize this, which is why they try to keep black men in the meantime since they still need the presence of black men for:
1) Getting resources from white society. Mostly by claiming that we abuse them (its why they love citing femicide rates, even though those femicide rates dont put the race of the perpatrator it just assumes its us due to proximity).
2) Resources from the top black men as a way to INITIALLY propel them forward.
>It's why, for example, Kimberly Crenshaw recently went to a confrence to protest black boys benefiting from the my brothers keeper program
Disciplining Anti-racism: My Brother
Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, pioneering scholar in the fields of critical race theory, civil rights, and Black feminist legal theory, will present her paper at the Law Department
They did the same thing during the 1990s btw. In order to lower the violence during the early 1990s, they proposed an all black boys school to get them off the streets and into career tracks. Black women sued the program and it got canned
Detroit's Boys-Only Schools Facing Bias Lawsuit (Published 1991)
@Gloxina just playing her part
@The Fade Theres a scene in that documentary where her white babydaddy drives them to go strip in front of millions, it basically describes what "black america" will be like soon. Timestamp is 29:15
I see Isabel Wilkerson wrote that article. Cant read because they want to sign up. Is she extolling Crenshaw?
Piff Perkins
Veteran
This isn't true. The Supreme Court isn't done for. Whoever is president next year will likely replace 1-3 justices. And there's the possibility that someone retires or dies between now and the election. Clear opportunity to either solidify conservative rule of the Supreme Court or return it to a liberal majority. And given that republicans are exclusively nominating candidates who outright hate "black stuff" it seems clear which side is better.
I've had a couple problems with these funds and frankly am not super upset to see them go. The first is obvious: the vast majority are designed to solely help black women while pretending like black men either don't exist or are so adjacent to white men that we don't need help. And the second is that I'm tired of this heavy handed approach to grants/fundraising/money/etc that are more about headlines than anything else. You don't need a fund for "black women only." You can do the exact same thing making an inner city fund, including white people in the ad campaign and then funneling all the money to black people. We gotta stop focusing on "black only" proclamations and instead understand that the hand who turns the faucet on controls who drinks.
The writing was on the wall when the Biden administration tried to give millions of dollars to black farmers exclusively through a specific plan, only for the courts to flag it as anti-white discrimination. You know how you stop that? Hire black people at the USDA who are there specifically to approve funds for black people. Doesn't mean you don't approve money for white farmers. Give them some too. But a significant increase in approvals for black farmers - without an official proclamation that you're doing it - is more important.
Use 12ft.io to bypass the paywall
Yeah. Black America is transforming into brazil (im not talking about the racial mixing part, im talking about the quality of living and poltiics). Black women seem to think that "divesting" will save them but instead it will just lead them to live in favela type conditions with their mixed kids, just like in brazil. Check this out:
I think they realize this, which is why they try to keep black men in the meantime since they still need the presence of black men for:
1) Getting resources from white society. Mostly by claiming that we abuse them (its why they love citing femicide rates, even though those femicide rates dont put the race of the perpatrator it just assumes its us due to proximity).
2) Resources from the top black men as a way to INITIALLY propel them forward.
>It's why, for example, Kimberly Crenshaw recently went to a confrence to protest black boys benefiting from the my brothers keeper program
Disciplining Anti-racism: My Brother
Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, pioneering scholar in the fields of critical race theory, civil rights, and Black feminist legal theory, will present her paper at the Law Department
They did the same thing during the 1990s btw. In order to lower the violence during the early 1990s, they proposed an all black boys school to get them off the streets and into career tracks. Black women sued the program and it got canned
Detroit's Boys-Only Schools Facing Bias Lawsuit (Published 1991)
@Gloxina just playing her part
@The Fade Theres a scene in that documentary where her white babydaddy drives them to go strip in front of millions, it basically describes what "black america" will be like soon. Timestamp is 29:15
Brazil has an debate on who is black because you got a ton of confused mulattos that are rejected by whites hijacking black spaces. Also LGBT have hijacked black spaces, this is not to say there are not black LGBT but more so their misandry adds fuel to the misandry of the mulattos, and actual “black” feminist which in term makes it where hetrosexual black men simply date out or serve as “community dikk”.
The parrallels are the same as the USA outside of USA never had policy whether legit or indirect to speed up race mixing as a solution to the “negro problem”. This is why we have a strong history of parallel societies and culture (which aided making black America the light of the black world) as we didnt live to just be the entertainment for crackers (even though we had that aspect there were multiple “lanes” for blacks in the USA paired with mt earlier statement about black america having parallel socieities to whites ie Universities that competed with Ivys, black upperclass communities, etc).
Yeah this election is make or break, and the way the black community is treating it is just goes to show how pathetic gen X, Millennials and Gen Z are. Boomers are more or less just waiting to die and arent really tuned in with the details, they just know that they gotta vote dem to keep receiving those social security checks.
Yeah I peeped the LGBTQ stuff. Nothing wrong with LGBTQ but the way they implimented it in Brazil favelas is interesting....
In the documentary some of the boys said that old white men come to the favelas and "buy" underaged boys. shyt wild.
