Colombia’s first leftist president says war on drugs has failed

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,197
Reputation
8,613
Daps
161,838

Associated Press
Mon 8 Aug 2022 00.29 EDT



Colombia’s first leftist president has been sworn into office, promising to fight inequality and bring peace to a country long haunted by bloody feuds between the government, drug traffickers and rebel groups.

Gustavo Petro, a former member of Colombia’s M-19 guerrilla group, won the presidential election in June by beating conservative parties that offered moderate changes to the market-friendly economy, but failed to connect with voters frustrated by rising poverty and violence against human rights leaders and environmental groups in rural areas.

On Sunday, he said Colombia was getting a “second chance” to tackle violence and poverty and promised that his government would implement economic policies that seek to end longstanding inequalities and ensure “solidarity” with the nation’s most vulnerable.


The incoming president said he was willing to start peace talks with armed groups across the country and also called on the United States and other developed nations to change drug policies that have focused on the prohibition of substances like cocaine, and fed violent conflicts across Colombia and other Latin American nations.

“It’s time for a new international convention that accepts that the war on drugs has failed,” he said. “Of course peace is possible. But it depends on current drug policies being substituted with strong measures that prevent consumption in developed societies.”

Petro is part of a growing group of leftist politicians and political outsiders who have been winning elections in Latin America since the pandemic broke out and hurt incumbents who struggled with its economic aftershocks.

The ex-rebel’s victory was also exceptional for Colombia, where voters had been historically reluctant to back leftist politicians who were often accused of being soft on crime or allied with guerrillas.

Hundreds gathered in the country’s capital to celebrate the inauguration of the new Colombian President Gustavo Petro and Vice President Francia Marquez in Bogota.

Hundreds gathered in the country’s capital to celebrate the inauguration of the new Colombian President Gustavo Petro and Vice President Francia Marquez in Bogota. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

A 2016 peace deal between Colombia’s government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia turned the focus of voters away from the violent conflicts playing out in rural areas and gave prominence to problems like poverty and corruption, fuelling the popularity of leftist parties in national elections. However, smaller rebel groups like the National Liberation Army and the Gulf Clan continue to fight over drug trafficking routes, illegal goldmines and other resources abandoned by the FARC.

Petro, 62, has described US-led anti-narcotics policies as a failure but has also said he would like to work with Washington “as equals,” building schemes to combat climate change or bring infrastructure to rural areas where many farmers say coca leaves are the only viable crop.

Petro also formed alliances with environmentalists during his presidential campaign and has promised to turn Colombia into a “global powerhouse for life” by slowing deforestation and reducing the country’s reliance on fossil fuels.

He has said Colombia will stop granting new licenses for oil exploration and will ban fracking projects, even though the oil industry makes up almost 50% of the nation’s legal exports. He plans to finance social spending with a $10bn a year tax reform that would boost taxes on the rich and do away with corporate tax breaks.

“He’s got a very ambitious agenda,” said Yan Basset, a political scientist at Bogotá’s Rosario University. “But he will have to prioritize. The risk Petro faces is that he goes after too many reforms at once and gets nothing” through Colombia’s congress.

Analysts expect Petro’s foreign policy to be markedly different from that of his predecessor Iván Duque, a conservative who backed Washington’s drug policies and worked with the US government to isolate the regime of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in an attempt to force the authoritarian leader into holding free elections.

Petro has instead said he will recognise Maduro’s government and try to work with the Venezuelan president on several issues, including fighting rebel groups along the porous border between the countries. Some border residents are hoping that improved relations will generate more commerce and job opportunities.

In Cúcuta, a city just a few miles from the Venezuelan border, trade school student Daniela Cárdenas is hoping Petro will carry out an educational reform that includes free tuition for college students.

“He has promised so many things,” Cardenas, 19, said after traveling 90 minutes from her rural community to the city. “We must work to be able to pay our student fees, which are quite expensive and, well, that makes many things difficult for us.”

Petro won the election by just 2 percentage points, and is still a polarizing figure in Colombia, where many have been wary of having former guerrillas participate in politics
.
 

Mashal88

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,071
Reputation
185
Daps
5,191
Prohibition has never truly worked anywhere in the world. If you're fighting a physical battle against vices you will always fail. People will get high on whatever their drug of choice is and will do it regardless of policies, and someone will always be there to sell worse shyt illegally because there's money to be made. Someone will always be there to manufacture some deadly shyt for addicts. More overdose deaths. More people locked up. More people killed. As the cycle goes. The countries that claim it works don't actually produce any real data about the issue of abuse in their countries, because how can we accept that our heavy-handed policies don't actually work? We'd actually have to try something different. What sounds good is what goes for them, as long as to the outside world the problem seems like its being handled.
 

50CentStan

Allahu Akbar
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
23,658
Reputation
3,174
Daps
75,291
Reppin
The Ummah!
.

He has said Colombia will stop granting new licenses for oil exploration and will ban fracking projects, even though the oil industry makes up almost 50% of the nation’s legal exports. He plans to finance social spending with a $10bn a year tax reform that would boost taxes on the rich and do away with corporate tax breaks.

.

.

:damn: them colombians about to flood miami like venezuelans
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
14,068
Reputation
3,161
Daps
56,727
Bout to be a bunch of misguided out of context takes

‘The war on drugs failed’ when we say it, as the country just receiving the drugs , is apples and oranges compared to when it’s said by the country where all the certels are. What was their other option? Not to mention we can’t take his statement for face value given how much corruption there is and who known who’s pocket he’s in
 

Reflected

Living in fear in the year of the tiger.
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
6,123
Reputation
1,655
Daps
20,846
:damn: them colombians about to flood miami like venezuelans
Venezuelan situation is more complex than just restricting fracking and exploration. I honestly don't know anything about Columbia, so I guess I should start reading but for Venezuela, is was more than just nationalization that sent it in a downward spiral, and last I checked, assuming accurate reporting, Maduro has handled the inflation rate, the rate at the start of his term was going to happen no matter what.

edit: Because the post was barebones.

But for Venezuela, as simple as I can put it
- Erratic leadership (Chavez)
- Corruption in nationalized sectors, specifically oil
- Incompetence in nationalized sectors, primarily oil where they could not replace the machinery and competence of the international companies that were ousted
- Given the method of ousting and overall corruption, an inability to negotiate with international companies, due to their unwillingness to ever want to invest the country again
- Heavy sanctions

I could go on and on, but Venezuela was just a mess for a very long time, an interesting mess though.
 
Last edited:

goatmane

Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
16,710
Reputation
2,504
Daps
114,101
Prohibition has never truly worked anywhere in the world. If you're fighting a physical battle against vices you will always fail. People will get high on whatever their drug of choice is and will do it regardless of policies, and someone will always be there to sell worse shyt illegally because there's money to be made. Someone will always be there to manufacture some deadly shyt for addicts. More overdose deaths. More people locked up. More people killed. As the cycle goes. The countries that claim it works don't actually produce any real data about the issue of abuse in their countries, because how can we accept that our heavy-handed policies don't actually work? We'd actually have to try something different. What sounds good is what goes for them, as long as to the outside world the problem seems like its being handled.

Laws work. The law in the 1929s Prohibition permantly reduced alcohol usage. It hasn't come close since

Most citizens don't want to their city looking like San Francisco:yeshrug:
 

Mashal88

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,071
Reputation
185
Daps
5,191
Laws work. The law in the 1929s Prohibition permantly reduced alcohol usage. It hasn't come close since

Most citizens don't want to their city looking like San Francisco:yeshrug:
Where did you get your statistics? It reduced alcohol usage for like 2 years and then lead to a swift increase in alcohol consumption for the rest of prohibition. Why? Due to people illegally making and selling alcohol. The death-rate of alcohol drinkers also increased massively during prohibition. And of course we can't forget the increases in crime.
 
Top