Say you have 30 beats that have been chosen by an artist for a new tape from a pool of almost 400 beats
But only about 13-16 tracks will be on the project and recording has to stay within budget (aka the cheaper the better)
Two choices:
A. Cut down those 30 to the desired amount (13-16) so the artist can write to it beforehand. This would cut costs b/c the artist doesn't waste studio time on tracks the wont make the project. Everything is ready and all the artist needs to do is record those certain tracks and be good. Extra cash for promotion, etc.
OR
B. Record as many tracks as you can afford since some songs are growers plus you can get feedback and tailor the tape to the songs with the best responses. The down side is, more songs recorded (studio time) = more money spent.
What do u say? Also, no responses about DIY or going cheaper. All of this is being done where it can. So please give your two cents and why
But only about 13-16 tracks will be on the project and recording has to stay within budget (aka the cheaper the better)
Two choices:
A. Cut down those 30 to the desired amount (13-16) so the artist can write to it beforehand. This would cut costs b/c the artist doesn't waste studio time on tracks the wont make the project. Everything is ready and all the artist needs to do is record those certain tracks and be good. Extra cash for promotion, etc.
OR
B. Record as many tracks as you can afford since some songs are growers plus you can get feedback and tailor the tape to the songs with the best responses. The down side is, more songs recorded (studio time) = more money spent.
What do u say? Also, no responses about DIY or going cheaper. All of this is being done where it can. So please give your two cents and why