BREAKING: Trump ally Thomas Barrack arrested on federal charge

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,160
Reppin
The Deep State




https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/20/tho...naugural-fund-arrested-on-federal-charge.html


Trump ally Thomas Barrack arrested on federal charge
Published Tue, Jul 20 20212:34 PM EDTUpdated Moments Ago
Dan Mangan@_DanMangan
Kevin Breuninger@KevinWilliamB
Share
Key Points
  • Thomas Barrack, who served as chairman of the 2017 inaugural fund for then-President Donald Trump, has been arrested on federal charges, several law enforcement officials told NBC News on Tuesday.
  • The charges against Barrack, which apparently are not connected to the inauguration-related fund, are expected to be unsealed soon.
106913844-1626806167911-gettyimages-1132734505-JAPAN_MILKEN.jpeg

Thomas Barrack, chairman and chief executive officer of Colony Capital Inc., gestures while speaking during the closing reception at the Milken Institute Japan Symposium in Tokyo, Japan, on Monday, March 25, 2019. The conference brings together business leaders and government officials to discuss geopolitical, economic and social issues facing Japan. Photographer: Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Thomas Barrack, a private-equity investor who served as chairman of the 2017 inaugural fund for then-President Donald Trump, was arrested on federal charges in Los Angeles on Tuesday morning, several law enforcement officials told NBC News.

The charges against Barrack, which apparently are not connected to the inauguration-related fund, are expected to be unsealed soon.

Barrack, 74, is a longtime friend of Trump’s, and the founder of the large private equity firm Colony Capital.

Barrack stepped down at Colony Capital’s CEO in 2020, and in April resigned as executive chairman of the firm.

A spokeswoman for Trump did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the arrest.

A spokesman for Barrack could not immediately be reached for comment.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.



@88m3 @ADevilYouKhow @wire28 @dtownreppin214
@dza @wire28 @BigMoneyGrip @Dameon Farrow @re'up @Blackfyre @NY's #1 Draft Pick @Skyfall @2Quik4UHoes
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,160
Reppin
The Deep State
nytimes.com
Thomas Barrack, Trump Fund-raiser, Indicted on Lobbying Charge
Sharon LaFraniere, William K. Rashbaum
5-6 minutes
Mr. Barrack, who served as chairman of Donald Trump’s inaugural committee, was accused in the Eastern District of New York of failing to register as a lobbyist for the United Arab Emirates.


20dc-indict-articleLarge.jpg

Credit...Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
July 20, 2021, 3:04 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON — Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a close friend of former President Donald J. Trump and one of his top 2016 campaign fund-raisers, was indicted on Tuesday morning on federal charges of violating a federal law requiring lobbyists for foreign interests to disclose their work to the Justice Department.

Federal prosecutors and the F.B.I. have been investigating Mr. Barrack for nearly three years, focusing on whether he tried to sway Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign or his administration on behalf of Persian Gulf nations with huge stakes in United States policy.

The inquiry was overseen by prosecutors in the public integrity section of United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. In an interview two years ago, a spokesman for Mr. Barrack said he had acted as an independent intermediary between Persian Gulf leaders and the Trump campaign and administration, not on behalf of foreign officials or entities.

The indictment charged Mr. Barrack and two other men with failing to register as agents of the United Arab Emirates government. The other two men charged were Matthew Grimes, a former top executive at Mr. Barrack’s company, and Rashid al-Malik Alshahhi, an Emirati businessman who is close to the U.A.E. rulers.

The seven count indictment also accused Mr. Barrack of obstruction of justice and making multiple false statements during a June 20, 2019, interview with federal agents.

The charges were announced by the United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and the F.B.I.

“The defendants repeatedly capitalized on Barrack’s friendships and access to a candidate who was eventually elected president, high-ranking campaign and government officials, and the American media to advance the policy goals of a foreign government without disclosing their true allegiances,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Mark Lesko of the Justice Department’s National Security Division.

Mr. Barrack’s real estate and private equity firm, Colony Capital, benefited from substantial investments from Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. In the three years after Mr. Trump became the Republican Party’s nominee for president in July 2016, Colony Capital received about $1.5 billion from those two Persian Gulf counties through investments or other transactions. Of that, about $474 million came from sovereign wealth funds controlled by their governments.

Mr. Barrack stepped down as the firm’s executive chairman in March. The firm was recently renamed DigitalBridge. According to a filing this month with Securities and Exchange Commission, Mr. Barrack owns ten percent of the firm and is one of its directors.

Mr. Barrack, 74, has been friends with Mr. Trump since the 1980s. He helped raise money for Mr. Trump’s first presidential campaign and ran his transition team after Mr. Trump won. But he was perhaps best known for leading Mr. Trump’s inaugural committee, which raised $107 million — the most money ever collected and spent to celebrate an inauguration.

Critics claimed the committee became a hub for peddling access to foreign officials or business leaders, or those acting on their behalf, but investigations by several local jurisdictions into the committee’s activities petered out with no charges filed.

The federal inquiry into Mr. Barrack’s ties with foreign leaders, reported by The New York Times in July 2019, was an outgrowth of the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III in Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The special counsel’s work put a spotlight on violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA, and led a greater effort by the Justice Department to enforce it. The law requires those who work for foreign governments, political parties or other entities to influence American policy or public opinion to disclose their activities to the department.

Several former Trump aides who were charged by the special counsel acknowledged violating the statute in guilty pleas, including Paul Manafort, the former campaign chairman and Rick Gates, the deputy chairman. Mr. Mueller referred questions about Mr. Barrack to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Brooklyn, apparently because the allegations went beyond his investigative mandate.

In one incident reported by The New York Times, Mr. Barrack tried to coordinate what Mr. Trump would say in a May 2016 campaign speech about energy policy with his contacts in the Persian Gulf, including Mr. al-Malik Alshahhi, the Emirati businessman.


In an apparent reference to Mr. Barrack’s Persian Gulf contacts, Mr. Manafort asked him in an email about the speech: “Are you running this by our friends?”

Sharon LaFraniere reported from Washington and William K. Rashbaum from New York. Kitty Bennett contributed research.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
1,065
Reputation
41
Daps
2,148
I read that they are listing Trump as one of the victims in this. He was supposedly duped into this plot.
:francis:
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,179
Reputation
3,747
Daps
110,275
Reppin
דעת
I read that they are listing Trump as one of the victims in this. He was supposedly duped into this plot.
:francis:
No surprise there, because Trump has no real political policy or ideology - Barrack's actions don't easily tie into a direct benefit for him. His legal argument will be that he was doing what he was instructed to do like a mindless lemming.
 
Top