Boston Dynamics' Stretch Can Move 800 Heavy Boxes Per Hour

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,939
Reputation
4,411
Daps
89,004
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Boston Dynamics' Stretch Can Move 800 Heavy Boxes Per Hour


Stretch's design is somewhat of a departure from the humanoid and quadrupedal robots that Boston Dynamics is best known for, such as Atlas and Spot. With its single massive arm, a gripper packed with sensors and an array of suction cups, and an omnidirectional mobile base, Stretch can transfer boxes that weigh as much as 50 pounds (23 kilograms) from the back of a truck to a conveyor belt at a rate of 800 boxes per hour. An experienced human worker can move boxes at a similar rate, but not all day long, whereas Stretch can go for 16 hours before recharging. And this kind of work is punishing on the human body, especially when heavy boxes have to be moved from near a trailer's ceiling or floor.

"Truck unloading is one of the hardest jobs in a warehouse, and that's one of the reasons we're starting there with Stretch," says Kevin Blankespoor, senior vice president of warehouse robotics at Boston Dynamics. Blankespoor explains that Stretch isn't meant to replace people entirely; the idea is that multiple Stretch robots could make a human worker an order of magnitude more efficient. "Typically, you'll have two people unloading each truck. Where we want to get with Stretch is to have one person unloading four or five trucks at the same time, using Stretches as tools." All Stretch needs is to be shown the back of a trailer packed with boxes, and it'll autonomously go to work, placing each box on a conveyor belt one by one until the trailer is empty. People are still there to make sure that everything goes smoothly, and they can step in if Stretch runs into something that it can't handle, but their full-time job becomes robot supervision instead of lifting heavy boxes all day.

Stretch is optimized for moving boxes, a task that's required throughout a warehouse. Boston Dynamics hopes that over the longer term the robot will be flexible enough to put its box-moving expertise to use wherever it's needed. In addition to unloading trucks, Stretch has the potential to unload boxes from pallets, put boxes on shelves, build orders out of multiple boxes from different places in a warehouse, and ultimately load boxes onto trucks, a much more difficult problem than unloading due to the planning and precision required. [...] Boston Dynamics spent much of 2021 turning Stretch from a prototype, built largely from pieces designed for Atlas and Spot, into a production-ready system that will begin shipping to a select group of customers in 2022, with broader sales expected in 2023. For Blankespoor, that milestone will represent just the beginning. He feels that such robots are poised to have an enormous impact on the logistics industry.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,928
Reputation
21,183
Daps
128,276
When they get an arm that can move 100-200 lb boxes at that rate, then I'll be worried. Right now, that's demo work.
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,349
Reputation
400
Daps
3,052
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
When they get an arm that can move 100-200 lb boxes at that rate, then I'll be worried. Right now, that's demo work.

Ive worked in data basing in a distribution center and the majority ( i want to say 70%) of items in either case weight or low units of measure were less than 50 lbs. This could revolutionize dock-to-trailer work since incorrect palletization causes a lot of damage product. Palletizing is an exact since and having the correct dimensions is critical for safe transport.

The cons:
Cardinal Health used to have a witron robots in several facilities but had hard time with it since robots like these can't compensate for unseen variables likes damage packages and dimension changes to products or packaging.

Before i left i chartered a project to scan and identify possible incorrect measurements or weight. I want say 10-15% of all SKU had some sort of issue. Warehousing automation is a cluster f*k lol
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,300
Reputation
27,505
Daps
506,229
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Ive worked in data basing in a distribution center and the majority ( i want to say 70%) of items in either case weight or low units of measure were less than 50 lbs. This could revolutionize dock-to-trailer work since incorrect palletization causes a lot of damage product. Palletizing is an exact since and having the correct dimensions is critical for safe transport.

The cons:
Cardinal Health used to have a witron robots in several facilities but had hard time with it since robots like these can't compensate for unseen variables likes damage packages and dimension changes to products or packaging.

Before i left i chartered a project to scan and identify possible incorrect measurements or weight. I want say 10-15% of all SKU had some sort of issue. Warehousing automation is a cluster f*k lol

Bingo.

Been in the supply chain industry my whole career as an Industrial Engineer. Damages and loading/unloading will still be an issue for automation for a while.

My former 3PL managed some Proctor & Gamble distrubution centers that had AGV (automatic guided vehicles) that picked up the unload freight on the dock and stored them in the racking. But P&G had the bread to do this. Still the issues from damage always threw a monkey wrench in shyt and you still had to have human backup for the AGV fukkery. Our guys loaded/unloaded still on the docks. the AGVs ain't ready for that part of the job or parcel/each/case picking product.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,939
Reputation
4,411
Daps
89,004
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Cardinal Health used to have a witron robots in several facilities but had hard time with it since robots like these can't compensate for unseen variables likes damage packages and dimension changes to products or packaging.

Been in the supply chain industry my whole career as an Industrial Engineer. Damages and loading/unloading will still be an issue for automation for a while.

Im not in the industry, but similar to automated vehicles, isn't the goal just being better than humans?
Hell, even if they arent better, the safety and cost could justify automation no?
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,300
Reputation
27,505
Daps
506,229
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Im not in the industry, but similar to automated vehicles, isn't the goal just being better than humans?
Hell, even if they arent better, the safety and cost could justify automation no?
The exceptions are the issue. Damage and shifted loads and freight are commonplace.
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,349
Reputation
400
Daps
3,052
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
Im not in the industry, but similar to automated vehicles, isn't the goal just being better than humans?
Hell, even if they arent better, the safety and cost could justify automation no?

I agree that you can automate some of the processes but the big issue is the variation of data and inputs. A simple example: heavy cases/boxes are on the floor/A-level and the storage location is design for safety. The issue is that manufacturers input incorrect weights and product dimensions. Automation is only as good as the information given.

Warehousing and automation in manufacturing arent as simple as it seems.

Again i agree there can be automation for certain processes. Wholesale automation is extremely difficult. It would require additional coordination between manufacturers, distribution center, workers, and freight companies.
 
Top