Warren Peace
Superstar
As I said in this thread right here, cacs have fukked up world history so much that if you try and point out how things don't make sense you look absolutely crazy. it takes more effort to correct a lie than to live in the truth, and that's how they get away with it.
Fair warning. This entire thread is gonna be crazy because not only does it not jive with the historical narrative which we've been given, but it makes little sense in the current status quo. Which is partly why I'm making the thread. If I can't make sense of it, maybe some of you guys can if I present everything which I know so far. That's what I'm gonna do here. Starting with this.
As for Tawny it's clear that this was a lighter shade of black, which is to say "of or like the brownish-yellow of tanned leather." It comes from the french word Tanét, meaning "dark brown". As it transcends languages and the years go on it seems the true meaning keeps changing in favor of lighter and lighter definitions until we arrive at today and see it used more as a noun for a caucasian that was burning in the sun
.
You're going to see this culture of colorism, which at one point was as prominent and relevant as racism, take root in Europe. I'm going to start with the clearest example seen in the words of the Queen of England, Henrietta Maria, when talking about her son Charles II.
In the History of England by Thomad Keightley, published in 1839, he is described as
And more like these
This leads right into my next point. I'm quite certain of the fact that in most cases they just painted right over them under the guise of "restoration". The evidence comes from the fact that when a painting that has been painted over is put under an x-ray, the initial coat of paint is revealed, showing us the original picture. To show what this is supposed to look like without any fukkery, we're gonna look at this painting of who they say is "saint maurice" (probably someone super important, but whatever).
when you hit him with the x-ray.
To be expected. Bro looks the same. Now let's do it to a painting of Johann I, Elector of Saxony.
Oh? Notice how the shirt maintains it's color, but the pale face... not so pale no more. shyt's looking a lil different... When doing this it's not just for revealing darker shades, sometimes they'll do this to a painting and what's underneath is something entirely different. Like when they x-rayed one of goya's paintings only to find the brother of Napoleon Bonaparte, based on the uniform he wore and timeline of when he was in charge of spain.
What's the first thing you notice?
Next is Phillip II, son of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V
looks like a breh scouring the internet for cheapest places to buy minoxidil
Next we're doing a two for one with Martin Luther, the reformer of the Catholic Church and founder of Protestantism, as well as his wife Katharina.
Fair warning. This entire thread is gonna be crazy because not only does it not jive with the historical narrative which we've been given, but it makes little sense in the current status quo. Which is partly why I'm making the thread. If I can't make sense of it, maybe some of you guys can if I present everything which I know so far. That's what I'm gonna do here. Starting with this.
Swarthy is an adjective dating back to the 1500s at the earliest, meaning "dark-colored, tawny," especially in reference to skin, being derived from swart, which in Old English means "black... being of a dark hue... The native Germanic word surviving in the Continental languages but displaced in English by black". So Swarth-y would be having the qualities of blackness or that of a dark hue.
As for Tawny it's clear that this was a lighter shade of black, which is to say "of or like the brownish-yellow of tanned leather." It comes from the french word Tanét, meaning "dark brown". As it transcends languages and the years go on it seems the true meaning keeps changing in favor of lighter and lighter definitions until we arrive at today and see it used more as a noun for a caucasian that was burning in the sun
.You're going to see this culture of colorism, which at one point was as prominent and relevant as racism, take root in Europe. I'm going to start with the clearest example seen in the words of the Queen of England, Henrietta Maria, when talking about her son Charles II.
Later on in the text on page 24, one of his potential suitors describes Charles II as
Then in another source, written for the purpose of examining the true nature of his death, a doctor named Norman Chevers wrote about the appearance of Charles in portraits, as well as that of his mother. Neither of which match well with the portraits we have today of either.
On the next page is him being described by contemporaries as
Saturnine is yet another synonym for swarthy which in this context meant "dark in coloring and moody or mysterious."
In the History of England by Thomad Keightley, published in 1839, he is described as
From the memoirs of John Macky, a scottish spy who lived during the 17th and 18th centuries:
So you would think he would look less like these
And more like these
This leads right into my next point. I'm quite certain of the fact that in most cases they just painted right over them under the guise of "restoration". The evidence comes from the fact that when a painting that has been painted over is put under an x-ray, the initial coat of paint is revealed, showing us the original picture. To show what this is supposed to look like without any fukkery, we're gonna look at this painting of who they say is "saint maurice" (probably someone super important, but whatever).
when you hit him with the x-ray.
To be expected. Bro looks the same. Now let's do it to a painting of Johann I, Elector of Saxony.
Oh? Notice how the shirt maintains it's color, but the pale face... not so pale no more. shyt's looking a lil different... When doing this it's not just for revealing darker shades, sometimes they'll do this to a painting and what's underneath is something entirely different. Like when they x-rayed one of goya's paintings only to find the brother of Napoleon Bonaparte, based on the uniform he wore and timeline of when he was in charge of spain.
What's the first thing you notice?
Next is Phillip II, son of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V
looks like a breh scouring the internet for cheapest places to buy minoxidil
Next we're doing a two for one with Martin Luther, the reformer of the Catholic Church and founder of Protestantism, as well as his wife Katharina.
