Biden signs bill to increase Social Security benefits for millions of public workers

Neuromancer

Rouge AI
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
79,531
Reputation
15,672
Daps
192,169
Reppin
A Villa Straylight.
President Joe Biden on Sunday signed the Social Security Fairness Act, bipartisan legislation that clears the way for teachers, firefighters, policeman and other public sector workers who also receive pension income to receive increases in their Social Security benefits.

The benefit boost comes as the new law repeals two provisions — the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and the Government Pension Offset, or GPO — that have been in place for more than four decades.

The WEP reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pension or disability benefits from employment where Social Security payroll taxes were not withheld. As of December 2023, that provision affected about 2 million Social Security beneficiaries.

The GPO reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows and widowers who also receive income from their own government pensions. In December 2023, the GPO affected almost 750,000 beneficiaries.

“By signing this bill, we’re extending Social Security benefits for millions of teachers, nurses and other public employees and their spouses and survivors,” Biden said Sunday. “That means an estimated average of $360 per month increase.”

That extra income is a “big deal” for middle-class households, he said.

More than 2.5 million Americans will receive a lump sum payment of thousands of dollars to make up for the shortfall in benefits they should have received in 2024, Biden said.


The Social Security Fairness Act will affect Social Security benefits payable after December 2023. More details on how the benefit increase will be implemented are not yet available, according to the Social Security Administration.

“With the repeal of WEP and GPO, federal retirees, along with so many others, will finally receive the full Social Security benefits they’ve earned,” William Shackelford, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, said in a statement.

The bill was passed by the Senate on Dec. 21 with a 76 bipartisan majority vote, including Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, who co-led the legislation in that chamber. In November, the Social Security Fairness Act was passed by the House with a 327 bipartisan majority, led by Reps. Garret Graves, R-La., and Abigail Spanberger, D-Va.

Advocacy groups who lobbied for the changes praised Biden’s signing of the bill as a historic move.

“Our organization has spent decades lobbying for the repeal of the WEP and GPO,” Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said in a statement. “We endorsed the Social Security Fairness Act — and are gratified to finally see this legislation enacted and signed by the president.”

The provisions have reduced Social Security benefits for decades.

“This victory is more than 40 years in the making, and while we celebrate today, we also reflect on those who were impacted by these provisions but are no longer here to witness this change,” Shackelford said. “Their service and contributions are not lost on us, and we honor their legacy by continuing to advocate for fairness in retirement benefits for all public servants.”

 
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
53,074
Reputation
23,626
Daps
248,120
Reppin
St louis
UKVu0t8.gif
 

RickyDiBiase

The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
16,064
Reputation
2,617
Daps
65,405
Reppin
Cbus

Ehh, I disagree

There's a noticeable bias due to propaganda and overall contempt for Democrats based on the large populaces own insecurities and prejudices. Never a democrat myself, but I've lived long enough to see this exact same sentiment play over and over again and I'm pushing 40
 

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
13,987
Reputation
30,882
Daps
113,558
Ehh, I disagree

There's a noticeable bias due to propaganda and overall contempt for Democrats based on the large populaces own insecurities and prejudices. Never a democrat myself, but I've lived long enough to see this exact same sentiment play over and over again and I'm pushing 40


Americans are retarded and dems are terrible at messaging/marketing.

These nikkas need Jay Z’s PR team
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,429
Reputation
18,442
Daps
166,551
Trump is going to end up getting the credit again. Dems stay being terrible at politics.
Nope, Americans are fukking retarded.
Nah

Americans are just fukking retarded.
Yup, Americans are fukking retarded.
Americans are retarded and dems are terrible at messaging/marketing.

These nikkas need Jay Z’s PR team
This weighs more heavily on Americans being retarded.

One thing people have to start admitting is some of us like to be SHOWN something is happening, and a bunch of us is ok with it being told.
People on the right who have heavy cultural reasons for their votes are ok being told. People on the left and a bunch of independents are like
" :dahell: You said that but where my shyt at?"

Democrats talked about how good the economy is. BY EVERY fukkING MEASURE IT IS LEADING THE WORLD! The reasons people are not feeling it are varied and to actually know the intricacies requires you pay attention. People talk about the price of eggs but don't know about bird flu leading to culling. That shyt will be on nightly news and in all financial media because commodities are important. A bunch of American's just somehow don't get the message even if mothafukkin AOC is having nightly twitch chats about it and posting on social media with 40k likes. Oil embargo somewhere? Its on all major media, and all financial gurus are talking about it. Americans still don't broadly know.

We have a President coming in who lied about everything and was unapologetic about it. If politicians on the left started acting the same way, and don't lie to yourselves, many of us would be turned off for them being bloviating pieces of shyt who are all show and no go. Mind you people have been scammed by thinking they could vote online, Russian and Chinese bots are in all the comments saying all kinds of crazy shyt, and stupid people congregate and come up with stupid ideas like the flat Earth.

I'm over the "Dems have bad messaging" schtick because all of you 3 and everybody else has SEEN people have the truth in their fukking faces but people like "That don't work for me, dawg" and go the other way. Remember this?

perot_charts.jpg

ross-perot-infomercial.jpg

ross-perot-gettyimages-50705174.jpeg


While he got a sizeable vote, people don't have this attention span. They don't want charts, they want someone to speak to how they feel and sometimes truth gets in the way of that. So in closing...

quote-you-don-t-wanna-hear-the-truth-so-i-ma-lie-to-you-make-it-sound-fly-to-you-cee-lo-green-67-51-17.jpg
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
22,468
Reputation
8,278
Daps
95,063
Reppin
Chase U
It’s always only for the public sector with Biden
Did you read the article? The bill is addressing a problem that only affected public-sector workers by repealing two rules (WEP and GPO) that unfairly cut their Social Security benefits if they also had a government pension. These cuts didn't affect private-sector workers.
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,429
Reputation
18,442
Daps
166,551
Did you read the article? The bill is addressing a problem that only affected public-sector workers by repealing two rules (WEP and GPO) that unfairly cut their Social Security benefits if they also had a government pension. These cuts didn't affect private-sector workers.
That post illustrates what @RickyDiBiase and I are talking about. The information is literally right the fukk there, and for any followup questions, google works.

Imagine if this dude, assuming he is American, votes against someone because they "only care about public sector workers" when if he took 2 minutes to read about this BIPARTISAN legislation, he would be more informed before saying an opinion. You can't message to the retarded cause any effort to self-inform is too much. 2 minutes of reading, fam. Even worse if he read it and came to that conclusion anyway. :francis:
 
Top