Biden Offers Ambitious Blueprint for Solar Energy

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,913
Reputation
4,411
Daps
88,974
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Biden Offers Ambitious Blueprint for Solar Energy


The expansion of solar energy is part of President Biden's effort to fight climate change, but there would be little historical precedent for increasing solar energy, which contributed less than 4 percent of the country's electricity last year, that quickly. Such a large increase, laid out in an Energy Department report, is in line with what most climate scientists say is needed to stave off the worst effects of global warming. It would require a vast transformation in technology, the energy industry and the way people live.

The Energy Department said its calculations showed that solar panels had fallen so much in cost that they could produce 40 percent of the country's electricity by 2035 -- enough to power all American homes -- and 45 percent by 2050. Getting there will mean trillions of dollars in investments by homeowners, businesses and the government. The electric grid -- built for hulking coal, natural gas and nuclear power plants -- would have to be almost completely remade with the addition of batteries, transmission lines and other technologies that can soak up electricity when the sun is shining and to send it from one corner of the country to another.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
57,570
Reputation
8,519
Daps
160,385


1/10
@Sammy_Roth
Los Angeles is opening a giant solar and battery plant in the high desert. It will produce 7% of the city's power, for a record low price.

I took a helicopter from City Hall for a tour. My @latimes story on L.A.'s rapid progress toward 100% clean energy: Column: L.A.'s massive new solar farm is cheap and impressive. More, please



2/10
@imdavidbryan
7% based on what exactly - capacity? That means nothing at all. The actual power produced would be a tiny fraction of that.
How much environmental devastation will this be causing? 100% clean energy -- not likely.



3/10
@Sammy_Roth
No, based on production.



4/10
@Eugene646
RT /search?q=#ElonMusk electric transmission lines from source to consumer; getting power from one place to many is problematic and expensive. /search?q=#Christmas



GegxICQXwAAGIZx.jpg

GegxICQXMAA3dtQ.jpg

GegxICPWQAADMPh.jpg

GegxICPXAAALTk9.jpg


5/10
@Dean_Dykema
For some reason, this "record lower price" that @Sammy_Roth speaks of will be disastrous for modest-income ratepayers. Time will tell for sure, but so far, progressive jurisdictions are by far the most expensive for modest-income (and others) ratepayers. Why is that?



6/10
@allenfreemon
Sorry, work for a different media source.



7/10
@emmartin173
At this point, I wonder why it isn't standard to have all buildings, commercial & residential, have as much solar as their roofs can take.



8/10
@kennycollins88
Get a haircut.



9/10
@ftreric
That's an interesting article, thanks for sharing!



10/10
@KneeDeep395
How much habitat does that bury?




To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 
Top