His whole run was built on cheap heat.
No it wasn't. You can't build a whole run from cheap heat. Just ask the Miz.
His whole run was built on cheap heat.
No it wasn't. You can't build a whole run from cheap heat. Just ask the Miz.
He was better than Miz, I'll give him that.
People were shytting on JBL's run back then now all the sudden it was great
To be fair though Punk's only been heel since September so this thread doesn't really make sense.
The only good thing JBL ever did was make a broke-ass HBK his slave.
Dude is poopy.
You nikkas are crazy.
JBL's title reign was damn near a year of the most boring ass feuds and main events ever. His character was good, but he could've done that shyt OUT of the title picture. After the Eddie feud, the rest of that year can kick rocks. He was the champion during a weak-ass year for SD, and then proceeded to have boring-ass main events after he lost it and tried to get it back. Without a microphone, JBL's reign was pure trash.
I know "dis Punk at any cost" is the new trend around here, but really? JBL's reign?![]()
THANK YOU.
JBL was fukking trash and deaded the entire brand. I never fukked with that show when JBL was on top. Never bought him at that main event level. U.S. champ at best.
So what you want about how either guy generated heat but at least Punk has good/decent matches. A JBL match was guaranteed.
Next there's gonna be a poll about how King Mabel had a better heel title run than Punk.![]()
CM Punk is a fakkit.
That's my answer to that question.