MayQueen
Just here to help you do better.
Stealing threads from Lipstick Alley are we?
Ain't the first time.
![sas2 :sas2: :sas2:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sass2.png)
Stealing threads from Lipstick Alley are we?
:yaoha:
No theyre not and you dont have documentation to prove that either. Theyve looked the way theyve looked throughout their history. If anything arabs got their features from them. Tired of having to explain this. Its like saying Khoisans are mixed just because theyre not dark and have different eyes.first you have the habesha tribes that are heavily mixed with non-African ancestry. most of em are probably 50% african. 50% non-African. hence alot of em have .
So what about Dominicans, Cubans, Columbians, etc who have mixed ancestry also? LOL@shyt science like this being taken serious
Idk about all that, a lot of "Habesha" (from my experience, in my own family with Tigray/Amhara) are like a pick and mix some of them have kinky hair, or looser curls, light skin, dark skin. You can't definitively say they look more mulatto because anybody who knows actual "Habesha" knows that ain't true. My mother is of Amhara origin, however her grandmother was Afar and she says that's where she got her jet black straight hair. You can't even tell the difference between Oromo, Harari, Afar, Amhara, Tigray, Gurage, they all look the same. You can't even tell the difference between Horn of Africans at all sometimes. Some Masai can actually pass for them too.
I'd also like to see receipts for Habesha having that much mixed blood.![]()
Again, where's your proof?thats because people mix. my post was dealing with averages. the average tigray looks very little like the average karrayu oromo. obviously there are outlier crossovers but stop acting like there aren't distinct differences between ethnic groups.
and there are huge differences between cushytic and semetic speaking horn africans. the semetic speakers have more non-African ancestry.