There both virtually equal in terms of stats but Faulk obviously had the better career with the Ring to show for..
the fukk ? barry easily.
yes, his career was better than FaulkYou taking Barry's career over Faulk's?
yes, his career was better than Faulk
I dont know what you are asking for in this thread
NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year (1989)
10× Pro Bowl (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998)
10× All-Pro (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998)
4× NFL Rushing champion (1990, 1994, 1996, 1997)
NFL Alumni Running Back of the Year (1997)
AP NFL MVP (1997)
NEA NFL MVP (1997)
PFWA NFL MVP (1997)
2× AP NFL Offensive Player of the Year (1994, 1997)
2× Bert Bell Award (1991, 1997)
Single Season 2,000 Rushing Yards Club
10,000 Rushing Yards Club
NFL 1990's All-Decade Team
Barry better
shoot, being a first or 2nd team all pro for the entirety of his career is already better
you need to change your thread to "Who played for the better teams, Faulk or Sanders?" because that is what you are asking.And yet he would trade his career for Faulk's ring ... Not to mention that if it wasnt for Faulk on that '99 team the Rams werent winning the superbowl