Ban on guns with serial numbers removed is unconstitutional -U.S. judge

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,728
Reputation
8,009
Daps
150,902

2 minute readOctober 13, 20225:33 PM EDTLast Updated 2 days ago

By Brendan Pierson

Guns on sale are stored in a case at the Cabela's store in Fort Worth, Texas

Guns on sale are stored in a case at the Cabela's store in Fort Worth, Texas June 26, 2008. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi/File Photo

Oct 13 (Reuters) - A federal judge in West Virginia has ruled that a federal ban on possessing a gun with its serial number removed is unconstitutional, the first such ruling since the U.S. Supreme Court dramatically expanded gun rights in June.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin in Charleston on Wednesday found that the law was not consistent with the United States' "historical tradition of firearm regulation," the new standard laid out by the Supreme Court in its landmark ruling.

The decision came in a criminal case charging a man, Randy Price, with illegally possessing a gun with the serial number removed that was found in his car. The judge dismissed that charge, though Price is still charged with illegally possessing the gun after being convicted of previous felonies.

Price's lawyer, Lex Coleman, called the decision "thoughtful, measured and accurate." A spokesperson for the office of U.S. Attorney William Thompson in Charleston, which is prosecuting the case, said the office was "reviewing the ruling and assessing options."

The federal law in question prohibits anyone from transporting a gun with the serial number removed across state lines, or from possessing such a gun if it has ever been transported across state lines.

Serial numbers, first required by the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, are intended to prevent illegal gun sales and make it easier to solve crimes by allowing individual guns to be traced.

Price argued that the law is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's June 24 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc v. Bruen. That ruling held that under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government cannot restrict the right to possess firearms unless the restriction is consistent with historical tradition.

Bruen said serial numbers were not required when the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, and were not widely used until 1968, putting them outside that tradition.
 

EBK String

Better Ring String
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
31,368
Reputation
6,579
Daps
306,241
Bet you c00ns dont have the same passion for this as you do to some dusty nikka rapping about having a defaced pistol
 

Windows 91

Unreleased Operating System
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
8,909
Reputation
1,841
Daps
35,723
Reppin
C:\
So does this mean that anyone previously convicted can get charges thrown out?
 
Top