I wonder if Sterling knew about the...other Magic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e05c/2e05cb54cf9d6b339184d0288bd7e4a4c4acc81b" alt="1949ab6ccf5d11e39d580002c9d3cc00_8.jpg"
Makes sense. But I still feel that Sterling can fight this based on the legality of the tape recordings.
According to California laws:
California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation. See Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).
If he didn't consent to being taped, I'm sure he has a case, not within the NBA bylaws, but by how the evidence against him was acquired.
Not sure what else I provide to you but the facts. The article I gave you has taken into account what you typed.
I wonder if Sterling knew about the...other Magic
![]()
Lawyers have already done thisBreh this is a situation where lawsuits, litigation & millions of dollars are at stake. It's in everyone's best interest to do their due diligence on Sterling and verify that the recordings are accurate & weren't tampered/altered