steph_harden
Superstar
We know how boxing works, Its biased and can be downright shady. The one constant that usually stands true is that the Champ usually gets the benefit of the doubt. Even when the Champ loses, if he wasn't thoroughly dominated the Champ will almost always get the decision in his favor. We just saw it with Wilder. But strangely enough they didnt follow that template with Charlo, who i thought won the fight. Harrison worked his jab nicely and controlled rounds 3-5 but Jermell stepped up the pressure after that and dominated the last 3 rounds. I just don't see what the judges even saw to want to strip a Champ who was clearly controlling the fight, an undefeated one no less
Are there any other examples of this?
Are there any other examples of this?