Ancient Nubian DNA sequenced.

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,740
Daps
2,324
http://meeting.physanth.org/program...nfant-from-sudanese-nubia-ca-500-1400-ce.html


Analysis was carried out at the Molecular Population Genetics laboratory in the Smurfit Institute of Genetics at Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, DNA was extracted from a portion of cranial bone, indexed libraries were prepared, and the genome was sequenced on the Illumina platform using a MiSeq Personal Sequencer. Analysis of sequencing results indicated 0.59% endogenous DNA. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed; despite a low number of SNPs, the individual was placed between African and European clusters. Using a method developed in Trinity’s Molecular Population Genetics laboratory, the individual was sexed as a male. Haplogroup was assessed by analyzing SNPs from the mitochondrial chromosome with HaploGrep. The individual was assigned to L5a1a, a branch of the ancient L5 haplogroup with origins in East Africa.

This study demonstrates the potential to gain unique insight into Nubian populations through aDNA analysis. Additional aDNA analysis of the Nubians will provide invaluable information regarding genetic influence and gene flow in individuals occupying ancient Nubia.

Nubians appear to be midway between Europeans and Africans. They seem to have been a mixed raced people.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,424
Reputation
18,480
Daps
236,007
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
lol, the skeleton was from period of the Orthodox Christian Nubian era tho. By this point, many groups from outside of Africa had since settled and mixed with the indigenous communities. I'm sure this thread will do numbers nonetheless....:ehh:
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
http://meeting.physanth.org/program...nfant-from-sudanese-nubia-ca-500-1400-ce.html




Nubians appear to be midway between Europeans and Africans. They seem to have been a mixed raced people.
Europeans didnt exist when Nubians first walked the planet. I think alot of blatant historical evidence is being overlooked so white racists can appease their ego's by thinking they had something to do with the origins of civilization. :mjlol: These white supremacists are really that willing to lie to themselves. Its incredible.
 
Last edited:

RAX 010

NYG LWO METS
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
21,592
Reputation
5,021
Daps
44,308
Reppin
EAST✈WEST
k8zO4gu.gif
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
http://meeting.physanth.org/program...nfant-from-sudanese-nubia-ca-500-1400-ce.html




Nubians appear to be midway between Europeans and Africans. They seem to have been a mixed raced people.

That's nonsense. They're black. They probably just have a unique DNA signature which doesn't exactly match modern nikka DNA. But that doesn't mean they are "mixed race" nor does it mean they aren't black. There's no cac R1B signature which means there's no cac which means there is no "mixed race" anything. Cacs are defined by their haplogroups. If there is no cac haplogroup there is no cac. Their haplogroup is East African, who cacs do not possess. The categorical system here is contrived. Southern Europens have haplogroups Northern Europeans do not, and fit into clines Northern Europeans do not, and yet Southern Europeans are still considered white. The cac conspiracy strikes again.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,841
Daps
84,268
Reppin
NULL
http://meeting.physanth.org/program...nfant-from-sudanese-nubia-ca-500-1400-ce.html




Nubians appear to be midway between Europeans and Africans. They seem to have been a mixed raced people.

you do know that using the same tests Ethiopians come out as "midway" between Europeans and Africans. only reason is because cacs try to be slick and use West Africans as the baseline for Africa. if they woulda used east africans as the baseline, dude woulda come out african

just know that this guy would also come out "midway"
onlf.jpg


now are u gonna argue he's mixed? :patrice:
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
lol, the skeleton was from period of the Orthodox Christian Nubian era tho. By this point, many groups from outside of Africa had since settled and mixed with the indigenous communities. I'm sure this thread will do numbers nonetheless....:ehh:

Who knows if they ever did a full SNP analysis. Oftentimes full SNP analyses yield different results to full SNP analyses. The results can be misleading.

you do know that using the same tests Ethiopians come out as "midway" between Europeans and Africans. only reason is because cacs try to be slick and use West Africans as the baseline for Africa. if they woulda used east africans as the baseline, dude woulda come out african

just know that this guy would also come out "midway"
onlf.jpg


now are u gonna argue he's mixed? :patrice:

:laff:
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
...........:yeshrug:

Sometimes the results are consistent, sometimes they are not. There are risks of 1) sample error, 2) contamination. Even when we control for these, we can talk about how a group with its own haplogroup and no cac groups is "between cacs and negroes"s. It's a categorical error. I remember a poster here put up an analysis proving some East African population is black and yet early analyses recorded that they were "between" groups. Cacs create these classifications, sometimes without merit or justification.
 
Last edited:
Top