An Iowa fight over a Satanic display reminds us: Republicans believe "free speech" is only for them

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
57,368
Reputation
8,499
Daps
160,069

An Iowa fight over a Satanic display reminds us: Republicans believe "free speech" is only for them​

The key to understanding the GOP furor over "anti-semitism" on campus? A altar to Lucifer in the Des Moines Capitol​


By AMANDA MARCOTTE

Senior Writer

PUBLISHED DECEMBER 12, 2023 6:00AM (EST)​


U.S. House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) | The Baphomet statue is seen in the conversion room at the Satanic Temple in Salem, Massachusett (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)


U.S. House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) | The Baphomet statue is seen in the conversion room at the Satanic Temple in Salem, Massachusett (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)

save

It's become a holiday tradition, especially in the red states. Every year, in response to overtly Christian displays put up in government buildings, the Satanic Temple petitions to set up a display honoring Lucifer in state capitols. They usually succeed. See, the Supreme Court long ago created a loophole in the First Amendment to allow religious displays, by arguing that as long as every group gets to have one, it doesn't violate the "no establishment of religion" clause. By putting up altars to Satan next to the annual nativity scenes, the Satanic Temple makes their point about the silliness of this loophole.

More important, however, is the trolling part. Every year, Christian conservatives discover the Satanic display and have a loud, public temper tantrum about it. In this, Satanists prove their point: Conservatives claim to respect religious plurality, but it's a lie. The overt religious iconography on government property was always about promoting the Christian nationalist view that theirs is the only "real" American religion.

It's hardened into a ritual because both sides get something out of it. The fundamentalists get a chance to freak out and use this as evidence for their lurid conspiracy theories claiming demonic forces are out to get them. The Satanists and their fans get a chance to remind everyone that Republicans are hypocrites who never really believed all that "free speech" talk. This year, the annual rite is playing out in Iowa, where the Satanists have antagonized the Christians with a goat's head wreath in the Des Moines capitol building.

The story has more national resonance than usual, however. It's happening in the shadow cast by a much darker, more dangerous bad faith debate over free speech: The fight over alleged anti-semitism on campus.

In their twin quest to divide-and-conquer the left and deflect from Donald Trump's responsibility for unleashing a torrent of bigotry across the U.S., House Republicans decided to host one of their many disingenuous spectacles disguised as "hearings" last week. Three presidents of elite universities — Harvard, M.I.T, and the University of Pennsylvania — were summoned to discuss anti-semitism on campus in the wake of Israel's war on Gaza. In a clip that went viral, these three were unable to state plainly under questioning from Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., that students would be expelled if they called for genocide of Jews.

The trick worked as intended, causing the anti-MAGA coalition to tear at each other with arguments over whether these presidents were in the right on free speech grounds, whether the threat of anti-semitism from campus is overblown, and why the voices of teenaged college students are treated as emblematic of the entire left. As Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times wrote, "you can see the trap Stefanik laid."

But while people get into often-incomprehensible arguments over the finer points of defining "genocide" and "free speech," what is getting lost is the most important issue: Republicans are a bunch of lying hypocrites. It's this message the Satanic Temple is trying to remind us all of with their holiday display. The MAGA right has been wailing for years about the alleged threats to free speech from hazily defined social pressures like "wokeness" and "cancel culture," but when it comes to opinions they don't like, they don't hesitate to call for the blunt force of censorship.

As many people pointed out, Republicans have defended genocidal and violent rhetoric for years now under the guise of "free speech." Trump's unsubtle calls for violence against his perceived enemies have led to an attempted murder of the husband of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D.-Calif., threats against government employees and even private citizens, and, of course, the insurrection of January 6, 2021. Dehumanizing rhetoric against Black Lives Matter protesters and "great replacement" theory have led to mass murder, shootings, and conservatives crashing cars into protests. But when liberals call for social media companies to curb the ugly rhetoric using their legal powers to self-regulate, a chorus of right wing whining about "cancel culture" erupts. We do not need to litigate how real the threat of campus anti-semitism is, in order to see how Republians use tensions over hate speech and the First Amendment to advance their "free speech for me, but not for thee" agenda

The Satanic altar at Iowa's state capitol showcases the same GOP bad faith, but at least with some levity. As atheists and other religious minorities have long argued, the reason Republicans want nativity scenes and other such religious symbols up on government grounds is obvious: To signal that the U.S. is a Christian nation, not a secular one. But Republicans can't admit that out loud, so instead they play word games with concepts like "free speech" and "freedom of religion."

The reaction to the Satanic altar in Iowa shows the emptiness of GOP rhetoric about "free speech." State Rep. Brad Sherman is on the warpath, insisting it's "a tortured and twisted interpretation of law that affords Satan, who is universally understood to be the enemy of God, religious expression equal to God in an institution of government that depends upon God for continued blessings."

To be fair, other Republican leaders in the state understand the law and that if they want to keep using government property for Christian proselytizing, they have to tolerate the presence of other religious expression, including that which is Satanic. But their MAGA-drunk constituents clearly do not agree. Whenstate Rep. Jon Dunwell released a statement explaining that the state must "either allow all displays or none," and advising the "primary response required is prayer" instead of censorship, he was raked over the coals by his fellow Republicans in mentions.

"To give quarter to the enemies of God is pathetic and contemptible," complained one woman. "God placed you in a position of authority for such a time as this," griped a man. Others quoted Bible verses at him that appear to call for literal murder of unbelievers or insisted that a true Christian believes the Bible trumps the constitution. Same thing happened across social media. Wherever the story about the Satanic altar appeared, the comments are completely dominated by Republican voters wailing about how the government needs to censor this, that the purpose of government is to uphold Christianity, and that the Founding Fathers supposedly agreed with them.

Some are explicitly using this to call for Christian nationalism:

This kind of thing is why it's so gross to see Republicans cynically exploit fears of anti-semitism to promote their culture war narratives about "campus leftism" and "political correctness." The Satanic Temple's trolling exposes the bare truth, which is the GOP is rapidly becoming a Christian nationalist party full of people who want to find a way to use government power to marginalize and silence non-Christians, or who are even those who are just critical of conservative Christianity. Right now, feigned concern for Jewish people gives cover to this "free speech for me, censorship for thee" mentality. But, one would be a fool to see all this outrage over the Satanic Temple's little joke and not conclude that these folks aren't going to be satisfied with only kicking out Satanists. This is about limiting who gets rights to free speech and religious liberty to conservative Christians.



By AMANDA MARCOTTE

 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
57,368
Reputation
8,499
Daps
160,069

Iowa lawmaker calls for Gov. Kim Reynolds to remove satanic display from Capitol​

Victoria Reyna-RodriguezNoelle Alviz-Gransee

Des Moines Register
and
Published 6:00 a.m. CT Dec. 11, 2023Updated 4:12 p.m. CT Dec. 11, 2023


Satanic Temple installs “satanic deity” at the Illinois State Capitol

The scene at the Illinois State Capitol where the Satanic Temple installed the “satanic deity” Baphomet as the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property recite the Rosary. Justin L. Fowler, State Journal-Register

A satanic display placed in the Iowa Capitol is unconstitutional, says an eastern Iowa lawmaker who is calling on Gov. Kim Reynolds to order its removal.

In the Dec. 8 edition of his Sherman Liberty Letter, Rep. Brad Sherman, whose district covers Iowa County and part of Johnson County, also calls "for clarifying legislation to be adopted in accordance with our State Constitution that prohibits satanic displays in our Capitol building and on all state owned property."

He proposes additional legislation to clear the way for displaying the Ten Commandments in all state buildings, including the Capitol, and in Iowa public schools.

The Satanic Temple of Iowa display at the Iowa Capitol.

The Satanic Temple of Iowa display at the Iowa Capitol. Nixson Benítez / The Register

But Sherman, a pastor, may not have wholehearted support of his initiative from other Republican legislators, some of whom say they would oppose the government limiting freedom of speech in reaction to the display, which will be in place for a total of two weeks.


Sherman: Iowa Constitution endorses God, and Satan is his enemy​

State Rep. Brad Sherman, R-Williamsburg, speaks with state Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, R-Wilton, on the House floor at the Iowa Capitol.

State Rep. Brad Sherman, R-Williamsburg, speaks with state Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, R-Wilton, on the House floor at the Iowa Capitol. Zach Boyden-Holmes/The Register

The controversy began bubbling last week after a group that calls itself the Satanic Temple of Iowa, though it lists no physical location on itsFacebook page, placed with state permission a small altar on the first floor of the Capitol. It displays what are described online as the "seven fundamental tenets" of Satanism, including the statement that "the freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend."

Completing the display are the temple's seal, electric candles and a caped figure representing the pagan idol Baphomet, holding a ribbon-bedecked pentangle and topped with a gilded ram's head.

Sherman says the exhibit has drawn widespread "outrage and disgust" among Iowans, "but few people think there is much that can be legally done about it because of free speech and freedom of religion."

"However," he adds, "I disagree."

He points to the preamble to the Iowa Constitution, which says, "WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IOWA, grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of those blessings, do ordain and establish a free and independent government, by the name of the State of Iowa... ."

"According to these opening lines of our Constitution, the foundation for laws and continued blessing and success in Iowa is based on these points: 1. There is One Supreme God. 2. Blessings over this state come from the One Supreme God. 3. We must depend upon the One Supreme God if we want to enjoy continued blessings," Sherman writes.

He says it is "a tortured and twisted interpretation of law that affords Satan, who is universally understood to be the enemy of God, religious expression equal to God in an institution of government that depends upon God for continued blessings."


Nativity to be installed at Capitol this week​

Some other Iowans who have viewed the display were likewise offended.

"I'm here today because this is so anti-Christian, so anti-Iowa," Evelyn Nikkel, a Christian praying in the Capitol rotunda, said last week.

Nikkel said a Nativity will be coming to the Capitol at noon Tuesday and then Iowans can see the "real reason for the season." Iowa Sen. Cherielynn Westrich, a Republican representing Ottumwa and Albia, affirmed the plan on Facebook.

State Rep. Jon Dunwell, R-Newton, on X, the social platform formerly known as Twitter, and on Facebook has tried to explain why the display was allowed. He's experienced considerable blowback in response, though he says that as an ordained minister and "as a follower of Christ, I certainly find a display from the Satanic Temple objectionable."

State Rep. Jon Dunwell, R-Newton.

State Rep. Jon Dunwell, R-Newton. Special To The Register

He says those who put up the display followed all the rules required to do so, adding that "the current operating principle has been to either allow all displays or none."

The Legislature can try to change those rules, he says, but "my observation as an Iowan and a State Representative, I don’t want the state evaluating and making determinations about religions. I am guided by the First Amendment of the US Constitution."

"The display is an inanimate object that has no real power in and of itself. We have nothing to fear," he says, adding that "the primary response required is prayer."


Lawmakers: Compromising rights a bigger threat than satanic display​

The Satanic Temple of Iowa display at the Iowa Capitol.

The Satanic Temple of Iowa display at the Iowa Capitol. Nixson Benítez / The Register

Dunwell calls for reviewing the guidelines for displays "to ensure they represent our constitutional rights"; monitoring the number of organizations that request displays to prevent the Capitol from being "overwhelmed" by them; and continuing "to dialogue with other elected officials and Iowans on this issue."

Dunwell, in a posting Sunday, pushed back at responses condemning his position.

"I would rather have an evil blasphemous display or no display at all than have the state dictate what they think is appropriate," he says, adding he has been "SHOCKED so many want to give up their freedom, so they don’t have to see a display they disagree with."

Rep. Steve ****, a Republican from Crawford County, said that while he agrees with Sherman on a philosophical level, he believes Iowans have the right to disagree about religion. In an interview, he said decisions about civil liberties can't just be based on the state constitution alone.

Iowa state Rep. Steve Holt, R-Denison.

Iowa state Rep. Steve ****, R-Denison. Iowa Legislature

"We also have the federal constitution, we have the Bill of Rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, (which) are just foundational values of our country… So while I totally hold a total disdain anything that this organization stands for, I nonetheless believe they have the constitutionally protected right to put up the display," he said.

**** said that in the time he has been in office, many atheist displays as well as Nativity scenes have been erected in the Capitol. Nativities periodically have been displayed in the Capitol at least since 2016, when the Freedom from Religion Foundation responded with a "Nativity" for the Bill of Rights.

"I think this is a test," **** said of the current satanic display. "I think this is really a test of just how, how strong your allegiance is to the Constitution and the concepts of free speech and free religion. It's easy to say you believe in those things when the speech is not that objectionable to you. But when the speech is really, really highly objectionable and offensive, unless it otherwise breaks the law, are you going to stand up for the constitutional rights of others or are you not?"


Satanic Temple founder: Ignore display if it offends you​

Lucien Greaves, spokesman and co-founder of the Satanic Temple, said it is always important for the group to seek equal representation in public forums that are open for religious displays.

"People assume that we're there to insult Christians and we're not," Greaves said. "And I would hope that even people who disagree with the symbolism behind our values, whether they know what those values (are) or not, would at least appreciate that it's certainly a greater evil to allow the government to pick and choose between forms of religious expression."

More:Parents in a Connecticut town worry as 'After School Satan Club' plans meeting

Greaves said individuals are not being forced to interact with the display and don't have to engage with it.

Staff writer Katie Akin contributed to this article.

Noelle Alviz-Gransee is a breaking news reporter at the Des Moines Register. Follow her on Twitter
@NoelleHannika or email her at NAlvizGransee@registermedia.com.

Victoria Reyna-Rodriguez is a general assignment reporter for the Register. Reach her at
vreynarodriguez@registermedia.com or follow her on Twitter@VictoriaReynaR.
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,375
Reputation
3,673
Daps
31,347
Reppin
Auburn, AL
Last edited:

Neuromancer

Rouge AI
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
78,911
Reputation
15,453
Daps
190,395
Reppin
A Villa Straylight.
I still dont know why satanists chose to be a satanist when its origin in the text it’s completely evil and irredeemable. Like why not just stay atheist, I never understand why they believe in satan but don’t believe in the consequences.
Atheists don't believe in Satan. Satanists do. Satan is a Christian Icon in its origin. Atheists don't believe Christianity is real.
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,375
Reputation
3,673
Daps
31,347
Reppin
Auburn, AL
I still dont know why satanists chose to be a satanist when its origin in the text it’s completely evil and irredeemable. Like why not just stay atheist, I never understand why they believe in satan but don’t believe in the consequences.
its occult shyt

basically it reduces down to this

im going to make some sort of metaphysical contraption as an altar to attract "demons" then im going to invoke Exodus 20:24

Exodus 20:24

24 An altar of earth thou shalt make unto me, and shalt sacrifice thereon thy burnt offerings, and thy peace offerings, thy sheep, and thine oxen: in all places where I record my name I will come unto thee, and I will bless thee.

so if someone (or something) is following you, it will destroy it. But there is another way to look at this and its the divine creation of women

Genesis 2:18-25
18 And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

Imagine if Exodus 20:24 "is the rib"
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
18,517
Reputation
7,471
Daps
91,314
Atheists don't believe in Satan. Satanists do. Satan is a Christian Icon in its origin. Atheists don't believe Christianity is real.
I always read "but Satanists don't believe in Satan either!" but I have no idea how true it is.

What I know is part of them are really invested in trolling Christians, see article
 
Top