Amazon Alexa is a “colossal failure,” on pace to lose $10 billion this year - Layoffs looming

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,662
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high

A division in crisis​

The BI report spoke with "a dozen current and former employees on the company's hardware team," who described "a division in crisis." Just about every plan to monetize Alexa has failed, with one former employee calling Alexa "a colossal failure of imagination," and "a wasted opportunity." This month's layoffs are the end result of years of trying to turn things around. Alexa was given a huge runway at the company, back when it was reportedly the "pet project" of former CEO Jeff Bezos. An all-hands crisis meeting took place in 2019 to try to turn the monetization problem around, but that was fruitless. By late 2019, Alexa saw a hiring freeze, and Bezos started to lose interest in the project around 2020. Of course, Amazon now has an entirely new CEO, Andy Jassy, who apparently isn't as interested in protecting Alexa.

The report says that while Alexa's Echo line is among the "best-selling items on Amazon, most of the devices sold at cost." One internal document described the business model by saying, "We want to make money when people use our devices, not when they buy our devices."

That plan never really materialized, though. It's not like Alexa plays ad breaks after you use it, so the hope was that people would buy things on Amazon via their voice. Not many people want to trust an AI with spending their money or buying an item without seeing a picture or reading reviews. The report says that by year four of the Alexa experiment, "Alexa was getting a billion interactions a week, but most of those conversations were trivial commands to play music or ask about the weather." Those questions aren't monetizable.

Amazon also tried to partner with companies for Alexa skills, so a voice command could buy a Domino's pizza or call an Uber, and Amazon could get a kickback. The report says: "By 2020, the team stopped posting sales targets because of the lack of use." The team also tried to paint Alexa as a halo product with users who are more likely to spend at Amazon, even if they aren't shopping by voice, but studies of that theory found that the "financial contribution" of those users "often fell short of expectations."

In a public note to employees, Jassy said the company still has "conviction in pursuing" Alexa, but that's after making huge cuts to the Alexa team. One employee told Business Insider that currently, "There's no clear directive for devices" in the future, and that since the hardware isn't profitable, there's no clear incentive to keep iterating on popular products. That lack of direction led to the internally controversial $1,000 Astro robot, which is basically an Amazon Alexa on wheels. Business Insider's tracking now puts Alexa in third place in the US voice-assistant wars, with the Google Assistant at 81.5 million users, Apple's Siri at 77.6 million, and Alexa at 71.6 million.

Are all voice assistants doomed?​

We have to wonder: Is time running out for Big Tech voice assistants? Everyone seems to be struggling with them. Google expressed basically identical problems with the Google Assistant business model last month. There's an inability to monetize the simple voice commands most consumers actually want to make, and all of Google's attempts to monetize assistants with display ads and company partnerships haven't worked. With the product sucking up server time and being a big money loser, Google responded just like Amazon by cutting resources to the division.

While Google and Amazon hurt each other with an at-cost pricing war, Apple's smart speaker plans focused more on the bottom line. The original HomePod's $350 price was a lot more expensive than the competition, but that was probably a more sustainable business model. Apple's model didn't land with consumers, though, and the OG HomePod was killed in 2021. There's still a $99 "mini" version floating around, and Apple isn't giving up on the idea of a big speaker, with a comeback supposedly in the works. Siri can at least be a loss leader for iPhone sales, but Apple is also hunting around for more continual revenue from ads.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,165
Reputation
16,172
Daps
267,238
Reppin
Oakland
People don’t want big brother in their house, acquiescing their demands. Cellphones and smart TVs are the best way for big brother.
Ehh, people are fine with big brother in their homes…to do shyt like turn on lights, play music and check the weather, just not to spend money.
 

The Bilingual Gringo

Tucked in to the socks
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
4,815
Reputation
935
Daps
9,455
Ehh, people are fine with big brother in their homes…to do shyt like turn on lights, play music and check the weather, just not to spend money.

This.

We have one in every room and it keeps us on schedule with various things, smart home functions, timers, music, and as a PA system so we don't have to yell throughout the house. We loved it during the pandemic as we set up a bell like schedule for our boys during their remote school year, it worked brilliantly.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,089
Reputation
6,156
Daps
166,950
Ehh, people are fine with big brother in their homes…to do shyt like turn on lights, play music and check the weather, just not to spend money.
If we aint willing to spend on it, then people don't really want it, IMO. :manny:

I think phones are something we accept more.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,165
Reputation
16,172
Daps
267,238
Reppin
Oakland
If we aint willing to spend on it, then people don't really want it, IMO. :manny:

I think phones are something we accept more.
I mean, they gave a practical reason for it, no one is ordering anything new they can’t see and read about…that’s why ordering on our phone works. But if you order shyt like toilet paper and face wash from Amazon, it’s easy to re-order via Alexa, but that’s not paying the bills for Alex, they want incremental spend.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,089
Reputation
6,156
Daps
166,950
I mean, they gave a practical reason for it, no one is ordering anything new they can’t see and read about…that’s why ordering on our phone works. But if you order shyt like toilet paper and face wash from Amazon, it’s easy to re-order via Alexa, but that’s not paying the bills for Alex, they want incremental spend.
thats true
 
Top