After raising Taxes, California expects a budget surplus

Street Knowledge

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,723
Reputation
1,867
Daps
59,273
Reppin
NYC
After Raising Taxes, California Expects Budget Surplus In 2014 | ThinkProgress


Since the Great Recession, California has epitomized the fiscal problems facing states. Its economy was ravaged by the housing crisis, and its budget gaps swelled into the tens of billions of dollars. Even before the recession, the state often struggled to balance its budget, hamstrung by legislative rules that made it nearly impossible to increase taxes.

Gov. Jerry Brown (D) took tax increases to the voting public in November, though, and voters approved multiple tax increases for 2013. After years of spending cuts and with billions of dollars in new tax revenue coming in, Brown now expects the state to have a budget surplus this year. The expected $851-million surplus would be just the second for the state in the last decade, the Los Angeles Times reports:



Proposition 30, the tax increase on the wealthiest Californians voters approved in November, is expected to raise $8.5 billion in revenue, bringing balance to the billions in spending cuts Brown had already approved to close California’s budget gap. The tax increases and the budget surplus will especially benefit California’s school system, which will receive a $2.7-billion budget increase in 2013 and more than $10 billion in increases by 2016. Medi-Cal, the state’s health care system, will also receive increases aimed at implementing Obamacare.


In Washington, President Obama has pushed for a similar balanced approach to deficit reduction. Thus far, 75 percent of the $2.4 trillion in deficit reduction that has been enacted since 2011 has come from spending cuts, and Republicans are refusing to consider further tax increases in future deficit reduction packages. Without tax increases in future deals, the ratio of spending cuts to tax increases could reach as high as five-to-one, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. But if California is any evidence, combining tax increases and spending cuts can bring balance to the budget while also allowing lawmakers to avoid cuts to education, health care, and other important programs.
 

Demonface

Pro
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,431
Reputation
40
Daps
967
Reppin
Jersey/Miami
They might most likely spend that money very stupidly and theyll be back to where they was before . But who knows?
 

Mr. 1nighter

On my grown man steeze
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,434
Reputation
80
Daps
2,880
how much debt is cali in?

this would be a good time to pay it down
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,094
Reputation
14,297
Daps
190,704
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
The sad part is that im sure they'll squander the money on some resdistribution of wealth program and end up in the same predicament next year.

:leon: I'm not aware of any such program, but a lot of aid is given to CC's and State schools.

CC's still have a relatively low rate of tuition at $45 per unit. 1/2 of the students(1 million) go to school for Free thanks to a fee waiver...


Tuition at State Schools, on average revolves around 7-10k a year depending on eligibility for grants and scholarships...

Honestly, are you just condemning social programs in general, because those are also greatly needed, throughout numerous areas...
 

No_bammer_weed

✌️ Coli. Wish y’all the best of luck. One
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
10,260
Reputation
7,885
Daps
58,139
The sad part is that im sure they'll squander the money on some resdistribution of wealth program and end up in the same predicament next year.

:birdman:
whats up with you bro? You're a right wing, talking point regurgitating machine. You're smarter than cribbing off Rush Limbaugh for your ideas, b.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,542
Reputation
13,576
Daps
244,280
The sad part is that im sure they'll squander the money on some resdistribution of wealth program and end up in the same predicament next year.

We save money to spend it on social programs. Stop it. Like instead of sending drug users to Prison we send them to rehab. Programs like that were slashed during the housing crisis.
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,427
Daps
17,421
What was the cost to economic output ...gotta give props as long as they don't think they can spend more.

I wouldn't give up economic gains for more revenue...I'd focus more on cutting spending but results are results
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,542
Reputation
13,576
Daps
244,280
What was the cost to economic output ...gotta give props as long as they don't think they can spend more.

I wouldn't give up economic gains for more revenue...I'd focus more on cutting spending but results are results

We did both. Cut spending and raised taxes. :whew: Paycheck lookin flabby n Sick on top of the money uncle sam took back from me in social security
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,427
Daps
17,421
We did both. Cut spending and raised taxes. :whew: Paycheck lookin flabby n Sick on top of the money uncle sam took back from me in social security

That's what politics is tradeoffs which is why I asked what the economic cost on output will be. Eventually somebody gotta pay for what is being spent on now and in the past.

Its a daydream to actually receive most of what you actually earn on your paycheck ...imagine if taxes were just 5% of your paycheck how much people would be eating :to:
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,542
Reputation
13,576
Daps
244,280
That's what politics is tradeoffs which is why I asked what the economic cost on output will be. Eventually somebody gotta pay for what is being spent on now and in the past.

Its a daydream to actually receive most of what you actually earn on your paycheck ...imagine if taxes were just 5% of your paycheck how much people would be eating :to:

I dont want to think about it. The reality is too harsh. 5 percent. Haw man.
 
Top