"A Story is only as good as it's Villain"

Rhapscallion Démone

♊Dogset Emperor and Sociopathic Socialite ♊
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
30,316
Reputation
18,611
Daps
138,583
"A Story is only as good as it's Villain" or "A hero is only as good as his Villain".

Do you agree with these quotes?

If so do you think a writer should focus on the villain and their motives more than they do the other characters in the story?
 

Somebody

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,487
Reputation
290
Daps
8,859
since the first christopher nolan batman film was cheeks, i would say yes.

i mean all of his batman films are boring and depend on cinematography except the one with bane. Tom Hardy really carried that one.
 

Rhapscallion Démone

♊Dogset Emperor and Sociopathic Socialite ♊
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
30,316
Reputation
18,611
Daps
138,583
since the first christopher nolan batman film was cheeks, i would say yes.

i mean all of his batman films are boring and depend on cinematography except the one with bane. Tom Hardy really carried that one.
Batman is a great example in general because most of the time his villains carry the story while he remains mysterious for the most part.
 

Swiggy

The King of Comedy
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,575
Reputation
6,294
Daps
87,517
Reppin
Detroit, MI
I agree with Batman being the best example. The third act of Begins was cheeks because of how poorly the League of Shadows were developed, and TDK was GOAT status.
 

42 Monks

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
55,298
Reputation
9,253
Daps
205,390
Reppin
Carolina
nolanverse batman cannot be your baseline for this kind of discussion :hhh:
protagonist vs antagonist/deuteragonist/tritagonist, man vs man/self/nature/society/etc, layered conflicts, and so on

a 'villain' is nothing more than a road for a lead to travel. if that

hyperfocusing on villains often discounts everything else that goes into writing
 

Somebody

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,487
Reputation
290
Daps
8,859
nolanverse batman cannot be your baseline for this kind of discussion :hhh:

protagonist vs antagonist/deuteragonist/tritagonist, man vs man/self/nature/society/etc, layered conflicts, and so on

a 'villain' is nothing more than a road for a lead to travel. if that

hyperfocusing on villains often discounts everything else that goes into writing

i disagree, but it was a great read
 

42 Monks

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
55,298
Reputation
9,253
Daps
205,390
Reppin
Carolina
quick example - game of thrones is a stand out popular franchise because protagonists and antagonists change hats from one chapter to the next. that complex back and forth emphasis lets readers love, hate, and most importantly respect a variety of aspects from that world due to perspectives that they wouldn't normally encounter in straight forward story telling. you've got characters defined by how they maneuver in a political environment, through war, through surviving in harsh settings, through identity crises, etc. martin shows consistently that he's not going to let readers off with simply labeling anyone a 'villain' without considering all they are attached to.

nolan essentially rolled out batman with a bunch of assumed knowledge and used villain introduced conflict to fill in the blanks for what's a decades old established character.
 

Rhapscallion Démone

♊Dogset Emperor and Sociopathic Socialite ♊
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
30,316
Reputation
18,611
Daps
138,583
quick example - game of thrones is a stand out popular franchise because protagonists and antagonists change hats from one chapter to the next. that complex back and forth emphasis lets readers love, hate, and most importantly respect a variety of aspects from that world due to perspectives that they wouldn't normally encounter in straight forward story telling. you've got characters defined by how they maneuver in a political environment, through war, through surviving in harsh settings, through identity crises, etc. martin shows consistently that he's not going to let readers off with simply labeling anyone a 'villain' without considering all they are attached to.

nolan essentially rolled out batman with a bunch of assumed knowledge and used villain introduced conflict to fill in the blanks for what's a decades old established character.

Cersei Lannister was an unrepentant bytch but she was so well written that you had to keep watching to see what she'd do next and if she would ever get her comeuppance
 

DaylitoJames

#SnitchGang Elite
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
92,483
Reputation
29,400
Daps
291,090
Reppin
Sneak Nation
"A Story is only as good as it's Villain" or "A hero is only as good as his Villain".

Do you agree with these quotes?

If so do you think a writer should focus on the villain and their motives more than they do the other characters in the story?
I agree... but you also need a good plot and good writing as well. :jbhmm:
 

OVER

Superstar
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
8,129
Reputation
5,610
Daps
45,136
Reppin
GA
I don't agree. Stories don't have to have a bad guy and plenty of stories have been fine while having mid villains by having them be one of many obstacles.
 
Top