A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions - National Constitution Center

Here is a short list of those landmark cases, as reported by the Congressional Research Service and Library of Congress:

West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish (1937). In a 5-4 decision, the Hughes court overturned a decision from the previous year, now stating that the establishment of minimum wages for women was constitutional. The decision was seen as ending the court’s Lochner era.

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943). In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court overruled Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940). Justice Robert Jackson’s majority opinion affirmed that forcing public school students to salute the American flag was unconstitutional. “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein,” Jackson famously wrote.

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954). A unanimous Warren Court (pictured above) decided that a separate but equal policy of educational facilities for racial minorities, consistent with Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961). Overruling Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the court said in a 6-3 decision that evidence gathered by authorities through searches and seizures that violated the Fourth Amendment could not be presented in a state court—otherwise known as the “exclusionary rule.”

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). Justice Hugo Black’s unanimous opinion invalidated Betts v. Brady (1942) and required state courts to appoint attorneys for defendants who cannot afford to retain lawyers on their own.

Miranda v. Arizona (1966). In a 5-4 opinion, Chief Justice Earl Warren concluded that police violated Ernesto Miranda’s rights by not informing Miranda that he could remain silent and also ask for an attorney during interrogations. The ruling invalidates two court rulings from 1958: Crooker v. California (1958) and Cicenia v. Lagay (1958).

Katz v. United States (1967). In a 7-1 decision (Justice Thurgood Marshall did not take part in the case), the court determined that a man in a phone booth could not be wiretapped by authorities without a warrant from a judge. The decision overturned two prior Supreme Court decisions: Olmstead v. United States (1928) and Goldman v. United States (1942.)

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). The court decided that Ohio’s criminal syndicalism law, barring public speech calling for illegal activities, was unconstitutional on First and 14th Amendment grounds unless the speech incited “imminent lawless action.” The decision overruled Whitney v. California (1927).

Gregg v. Georgia (1976). In a 7-2 decision from Potter Stewart, the court ruled that Georgia’s capital punishment laws didn’t violate the Eighth and 14th Amendment’s prohibitions on cruel and unusual punishment. The court invalidated McGautha v. California (1971), a prior death-penalty case.

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992). A divided court invalidated parts of two prior decisions, Thornburgh and Akron I, as inconsistent with Roe v. Wade.

Atkins v. Virginia (2002). The Supreme Court held that executions of intellectually challenged criminals were “cruel and unusual punishments” barred by the Eighth Amendment. The decision overturned Penry v. Lynaugh (1989).

Lawrence v. Texas (2003). Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, in a 6-3 ruling, cited the Due Process Clause and invalidated a Texas law making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in sexual conduct. The decision overturns Bowers v. Hardwick (1986).

Citizens United v. FEC (2010). By a 5-to-4 decision, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy writes for the majority and says the First Amendment did not permit the government to ban corporate funding of independent political broadcasts during election cycles. The decision overturned Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and parts of McConnell v. FEC (2003).

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). In a 5-4 opinion, Justice Kennedy said the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause guaranteed the right to marry as a fundamental liberty that applied to couples regardless of their sex. The decision overruled a one-sentence ruling in Baker v. Nelson (1972).
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018). In another 5-4 decision from Justice Kennedy, the court said sellers who engage in significant business within a state may be required to pay taxes, even if the business does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. The ruling overturned Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992).

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (2018). In a 5-4 opinion from Justice Samuel Alito, the court said the state of Illinois violated the First Amendment by extracting agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees. The decision overturned Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Education (1977).
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
:patrice:

I don't think it's the police's duty to educate you on the law


So you think we should go back to the era where police were allowed to purposely trip people up and keep them from their constitutional rights, but only the uneducated fall for it so they get even more disproportionally fukked by the system then they already are?




:patrice:

Also, why is it ok to use the death panalty on anybody but not on "intellectually challenged"?

They can die too:hubie:

Not "anybody". They banned its use on minors too, for the same rationale.

Honestly I'd be heavily in favor of banning the death penalty entirely. Supreme Court already did it once .
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
So you think we should go back to the era where police were allowed to purposely trip people up and keep them from their constitutional rights, but only the uneducated fall for it so they get even more disproportionally fukked by the system then they already are?






Not "anybody". They banned its use on minors too, for the same rationale.

Honestly I'd be heavily in favor of banning the death penalty entirely. Supreme Court already did it once .

To your first question...yes.

When the cops stop you, if you don't know your Rights I don't think it's their job to tell you.

When you're getting booked in, the person there can educate you on your phone call, your Right to an attorney and all that other shyt. But at the initial point of contact, it's all on you.

To your 2nd question, again, yes. Anybody can get killed. I'm pro abortion. Or if it's "cruel and unusual" than no one should get killed. We're all humans at the end of it and all feel pain.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,275
Reputation
16,202
Daps
267,958
Reppin
Oakland
To your first question...yes.

When the cops stop you, if you don't know your Rights I don't think it's their job to tell you.

When you're getting booked in, the person there can educate you on your phone call, your Right to an attorney and all that other shyt. But at the initial point of contact, it's all on you.

To your 2nd question, again, yes. Anybody can get killed. I'm pro abortion. Or if it's "cruel and unusual" than no one should get killed. We're all humans at the end of it and all feel pain.
:camby:

people should be read their Miranda rights, not everyone is going to know that shyt, especially people who otherwise wouldn’t be stopped if not for the color of their skin. Smh @ it being too much of a burden for cops to communicate this :rolleyes:
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
:camby:

people should be read their Miranda rights, not everyone is going to know that shyt, especially people who otherwise wouldn’t be stopped if not for the color of their skin. Smh @ it being too much of a burden for cops to communicate this :rolleyes:
:manny:

We were taught all kinds of manners and Rights as kids. Add this to the list.

Why my mom made me learn my SS# and phone # but not my Mirandas?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
:manny:

We were taught all kinds of manners and Rights as kids. Add this to the list.

Why my mom made me learn my SS# and phone # but not my Mirandas?


Why should someone's freedom be dependent on whether someone else was capable of teaching them?

And intellectually disabled persons are of course the least likely to know their rights, the most likely to be manipulated by fukked-up cops, the least capable of preparing their own defense, and are among those most often wrongly convicted.
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
Why should someone's freedom be dependent on whether someone else was capable of teaching them?

And intellectually disabled persons are of course the least likely to know their rights, the most likely to be manipulated by fukked-up cops, the least capable of preparing their own defense, and are among those most often wrongly convicted.
they're also capable of learning it themselves.

you're already leaping to the convictions...but a lot has to happen between the initial contact with a police officer and a conviction. Including, in the case of a booking/arrest, being read your Rights and given privileges while in custody.
 
Top