A sequel to "Split" should have been made prior to "Glass"

[WesCrook]

Just saw Glass for the first time last week, and "Kevin" was by far the most interesting of the three. In fact, I expecting a sequel after the original.

They missed out on this opportunity the flesh out his character. They tried to in Glass, but there wasn't enough screen time. Surprised they didn't follow up with it, especially considering how much they tend to milk out superhero flicks anyway.

 

[Peter Popoff]

There was no way of fixing it if that was gonna be the ending. That shyt was basura.

 

[klientel]

Glass should have never happened. It was awful.

they should have just kept building on split and maybe threw in a Bruce Willis or SLJ minor part once they established other people with abilities are out there.

 

[KING WILL]

Agreed.

There should have been a movie where The Beast was fukking shyt up.

The ending should have been Beast meeting Bruce's character in a cliffhanger.

The Glass movie should have opened with Glass talking, when the cam pans out showing that Glass is talking to an "somewhat" injured Bruce character as they hatch a plan to kill/capture Beast.

From there news reports of more Beast mayhem.

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

M knight connecting glass with split was beyond forced. The ending to split with Bruce Willis in the diner was so corny. Glass turned out to be terrible so suits him right.

 

[InGodWeTrust]

Glass was trash

 

[Tetsuo]

Glass should have just been good.

 

[CanesMiamiLakers]

I enjoyed glass

 

[el_oh_el]

I enjoyed glass

I did too. I def think it had wayyy more potential though. Ending was kinda jank

 

[The G.O.D II]

Split was the only good movie out of that saga. Glass was so mediocre and tonally just off

 

[theflyest]

Split and unbreakable should have remained separate entities.