8 things we wouldn't know without WikiLeaks
- Thread starter Black smoke and cac jokes
- Start date
two things. one, that chart is great. two, fukk hillary clinton and anyone who supports her 
as mediocre as obama has been, hillary woulda been worse in so many ways. at least barack's presidency set a new precedent and was uplifting to millions of people. hillary would have been worse on the economy and more hawkish militarily, and probably would have led to us having had 12 years of bush's and 16 years of clinton's consecutively. what type a bullshyt would that have been
as mediocre as obama has been, hillary woulda been worse in so many ways. at least barack's presidency set a new precedent and was uplifting to millions of people. hillary would have been worse on the economy and more hawkish militarily, and probably would have led to us having had 12 years of bush's and 16 years of clinton's consecutively. what type a bullshyt would that have been
and that doesn't even take into account the always rumored jeb candidacy 
Black smoke and cac jokes
Your daps are mine
This needs more attention, especially since that ho hillary will be a major player in the democratic convention...
bill and hillary been bout that life. you see em asking for people DNA
they aint playin no gamesthey're all gangsters in suits
Black smoke and cac jokes
Your daps are mine
Totally! Because poor spelling in a summary probably written in 5-10 minutes distorts the research done throughout several months.
Totally! Because poor spelling in a summary probably written in 5-10 minutes distorts the research done throughout several months.
Why spend only 5-10 minutes creating the visual representation of the research that took you several months? It's like stopping at the finish line because you just ran a great 99/100ths of the race.
yawn
Black smoke and cac jokes
Your daps are mine
Why spend only 5-10 minutes creating the visual representation of the research that took you several months? It's like stopping at the finish line because you just ran a great 99/100ths of the race.
Brah.....It's a summary of what they have consistently reported on for the last 2-3 years. This is for the people with ADD that have a hard time reading anything without colors, smileys, gifs, faces, or is more than 150 words.
Eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasy
Why spend only 5-10 minutes creating the visual representation of the research that took you several months? It's like stopping at the finish line because you just ran a great 99/100ths of the race.
did the misspellings void the truth being reported
content is more important than presentation
This probably the dumbest shyt I've read in a while. So hackers steal this info, make it public on the hidden Wikipedia and it loses credibility because some guy misspells something?
MBwithadream
All Star
You're a fukking retard. This is a summary of confidential information that Wikileaks put out. What does spelling have to do with the "credibility" of it. Smh. Smart dumb nikkas, I tell ya.
You're a fukking retard. This is a summary of confidential information that Wikileaks put out. What does spelling have to do with the "credibility" of it. Smh. Smart dumb nikkas, I tell ya.
I don't really put a lot of stock into summaries done by people who are functionally illiterate or are too lazy to run a spell-check. I have no problem with the information being reported or the validity of the actual leaks. My problem is that juvenile errors like the one in this info-graph allow/encourage people to dismiss the information outright.