53 Admitted False Flag Attacks

[PewPew]

Not Theory … Admitted Fact

There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

In the following 42 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admits to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goeringadmitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev alladmit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, thisand this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change. (HMMMMM)


Read More: http://www.globalresearch.ca/53-adm...s&utm_campaign=53-admitted-false-flag-attacks

 

[PewPew]

(11-21) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries. False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only – the murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960), bombings in Portugal (1966), the Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969), terror attacks in Turkey (1971), the Peteano bombing in Italy (1972), shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974), shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977), the Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977), the abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978), the bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980), and shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985).

(22) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(23) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(24) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(25) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(26) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(27) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(28) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(29) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(30) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

 

[PewPew]

(31) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

 

[Chez Lopez]

This is an excellent post. Why people ignore it on a higher learning forum? because the term 'higher learning' is only applied based on their knowledge of the circulated propaganda known as academia. Anything outside this circle of false knowledge presumably does not exist, even if it is admitted and substantiated. Also believing that there are false news stories, false news agencies, false college doctrine, false courses, and false colleges for that matter, would collapse the 'higher learning' standard that makes them intellectually superior, in their own minds. a slave system works first and foremost in the minds of the slaves.

 

[Meta Reign]

5 stars.

 

[Big Daddy]

This is an excellent post. Why people ignore it on a higher learning forum? because the term 'higher learning' is only applied based on their knowledge of the circulated propaganda known as academia. Anything outside this circle of false knowledge presumably does not exist, even if it is admitted and substantiated. Also believing that there are false news stories, false news agencies, false college doctrine, false courses, and false colleges for that matter, would collapse the 'higher learning' standard that makes them intellectually superior, in their own minds. a slave system works first and foremost in the minds of the slaves.

I hear your rant..but seriously, how many individuals of "higher thought" do you think you're really going to interact with on a forum specifically for Sports, Hip Hop, and "Piff"? It just isn't the type of place you should expect the "HL" forum to be so "scholarly" or thought provoking.

Enjoy the few intellectuals that actually are here and build with them. Your expectations of this place are set way too high. Keep in perspective what site you're on, what it's geared towards, and what demographic that attracts.

 

[Liu Kang]

This is an excellent post. Why people ignore it on a higher learning forum? because the term 'higher learning' is only applied based on their knowledge of the circulated propaganda known as academia. Anything outside this circle of false knowledge presumably does not exist, even if it is admitted and substantiated. Also believing that there are false news stories, false news agencies, false college doctrine, false courses, and false colleges for that matter, would collapse the 'higher learning' standard that makes them intellectually superior, in their own minds. a slave system works first and foremost in the minds of the slaves.

Nobody here denies the existence of false flags.
The only thing most people don't like is that some conspiracy theorists think that everything is a false flag and doing so without evidence but bogus youtube videos, sourcing from bogus websites and even without proving an ounce of evidence.

And from me to you, you're kinda being hypocrite here because you think that because you think outside of a supposed circle (because everything is propaganda and so on and only you is aware) makes you better than those who don't agree with you. You're actually the one here thinking that you're intellectually superior claiming others are slave-minded.

About the article, not all 53 false flags actually happened. Some were discussed plans, some others were signed plans but it's an interesting link nonetheless.

 

[Chez Lopez]

I assume that this place reflects the demographic at large. False flags are generally deemed as conspiracy nonsense, especially on 'scholarly websites'. If you find a scholarly website that approaches geopolitical subterfuge honestly then id join in a heartbeat. The fact is propaganda works THROUGH perceived scholarship, the students believe falsely because the teachers believe falsely.

 

[Chez Lopez]

Nobody here denies the existence of false flags.
The only thing most people don't like is that some conspiracy theorists think that everything is a false flag and doing so without evidence but bogus youtube videos, sourcing from bogus websites and even without proving an ounce of evidence.

And from me to you, you're kinda being hypocrite here because you think that because you think outside of a supposed circle (because everything is propaganda and so on and only you is aware) makes you better than those who don't agree with you. You're actually the one here thinking that you're intellectually superior claiming others are slave-minded.

About the article, not all 53 false flags actually happened. Some were discussed plans, some others were signed plans but it's an interesting link nonetheless.

lol. im a hypocrite yall.

 

[tmonster]

read this

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

(11-21) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries. False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only – the murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960), bombings in Portugal (1966), the Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969), terror attacks in Turkey (1971), the Peteano bombing in Italy (1972), shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974), shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977), the Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977), the abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978), the bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980), and shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985).

(22) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(23) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(24) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(25) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(26) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(27) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(28) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(29) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(30) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

Northwoods was never done. It was a proposal. And nothing more.

In fact, a lot of these are PROPOSALS and your text even says so.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Nobody here denies the existence of false flags.
The only thing most people don't like is that some conspiracy theorists think that everything is a false flag and doing so without evidence but bogus youtube videos, sourcing from bogus websites and even without proving an ounce of evidence.

And from me to you, you're kinda being hypocrite here because you think that because you think outside of a supposed circle (because everything is propaganda and so on and only you is aware) makes you better than those who don't agree with you. You're actually the one here thinking that you're intellectually superior claiming others are slave-minded.

About the article, not all 53 false flags actually happened. Some were discussed plans, some others were signed plans but it's an interesting link nonetheless.

Precisely the same thing I said.

The problem with conspiracy theorists is not that they're aware of the past and history, but that they're poor at predicting the future.

 

[gho3st]

Nobody here denies the existence of false flags.
The only thing most people don't like is that some conspiracy theorists think that everything is a false flag and doing so without evidence but bogus youtube videos, sourcing from bogus websites and even without proving an ounce of evidence.

And from me to you, you're kinda being hypocrite here because you think that because you think outside of a supposed circle (because everything is propaganda and so on and only you is aware) makes you better than those who don't agree with you. You're actually the one here thinking that you're intellectually superior claiming others are slave-minded.

About the article, not all 53 false flags actually happened. Some were discussed plans, some others were signed plans but it's an interesting link nonetheless.

I think categorically denying the possibility that an incident might be a false flag attack is as idiotic as immediately labeling all attacks as false flags.

 

[1/2OfDaBruinz]

Why are people in here talking about "But some of them were only proposals"

The fact that governments would even ponder some of this shyt is deplorable to say the least.

I don't fancy myself a conspiracy theorist, because its usually too much misdirection going on to figure out what the fukk is up until its too late, but I do know better than to trust anything that the government or media tells me. It's all taken with a grain of salt. At the end of the day, I really don't even give a fukk. shyt is what it is. I'm not wasting mental energy on none of that shyt, but I do know that governments across the world are very corrupt.

 

[thekingsmen]

You have sympathizers who continue to act like these proposals aren't in use at later dates or act like if regular people wrote it, they wouldn't be locked in prison for life. "It's only proposals". That's the real conspiracy theory thought.