5,300-year-old European iceman had dark skin

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,234
Reputation
10,282
Daps
59,811
Reppin
The Cosmos
A new look at the Iceman’s DNA reveals that his ancestors weren’t who scientists previously thought.

In 2012, scientists compiled a complete picture of Ötzi’s genome; it suggested that the frozen mummy found melting out of a glacier in the Tyrolean Alps had ancestors from the Caspian steppe (SN: 2/28/12). But something didn’t add up.

The Iceman is about 5,300 years old. Other people with steppe ancestry didn’t appear in the genetic record of central Europe until about 4,900 years ago. Ötzi “is too old to have that type of ancestry,” says archaeogeneticist Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. The mummy “was always an outlier.”

Krause and colleagues put together a new genetic instruction book for the Iceman. The old genome was heavily contaminated with modern people’s DNA, the researchers report August 16 in Cell Genomics. The new analysis reveals that “the steppe ancestry is completely gone.”

But the Iceman still has oddities. About 90 percent of Ötzi’s genetic heritage comes from Neolithic farmers, an unusually high amount compared with other Copper Age remains, Krause says.

The Iceman’s new genome also reveals he had male-pattern baldness and much darker skin than artistic representations suggest. Genes conferring light skin tones didn’t become prevalent until 4,000 to 3,000 years ago when early farmers started eating plant-based diets and didn’t get as much vitamin D from fish and meat as hunter-gathers did, Krause says.

As Ötzi and other ancient people’s DNA illustrate, the skin color genetic changes took thousands of years to become commonplace in Europe.

“People that lived in Europe between 40,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago were as dark as people in Africa, which makes a lot of sense because [Africa is] where humans came from,” he says. “We have always imagined that [Europeans] became light-skinned much faster. But now it seems that this happened actually quite late in human history.”
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,649
Reputation
-34,264
Daps
618,852
Reppin
The Deep State
:ohhh:

The Iceman’s new genome also reveals he had male-pattern baldness and much darker skin than artistic representations suggest. Genes conferring light skin tones didn’t become prevalent until 4,000 to 3,000 years ago when early farmers started eating plant-based diets and didn’t get as much vitamin D from fish and meat as hunter-gathers did, Krause says.

:wow:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,649
Reputation
-34,264
Daps
618,852
Reppin
The Deep State
“People that lived in Europe between 40,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago were as dark as people in Africa, which makes a lot of sense because [Africa is] where humans came from,” he says. “We have always imagined that [Europeans] became light-skinned much faster. But now it seems that this happened actually quite late in human history.”
:ohhh:
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,603
Reputation
4,235
Daps
77,519
Reppin
North Jersey
The Iceman’s new genome also reveals he had male-pattern baldness and much darker skin than artistic representations suggest. Genes conferring light skin tones didn’t become prevalent until 4,000 to 3,000 years ago when early farmers started eating plant-based diets and didn’t get as much vitamin D from fish and meat as hunter-gathers did, Krause says.
This monster been chasing us for over 40k years:damn:

As Ötzi and other ancient people’s DNA illustrate, the skin color genetic changes took thousands of years to become commonplace in Europe.

“People that lived in Europe between 40,000 years ago and 8,000 years ago were as dark as people in Africa, which makes a lot of sense because [Africa is] where humans came from,” he says. “We have always imagined that [Europeans] became light-skinned much faster. But now it seems that this happened actually quite late in human history.”
Yakub confirmed? Cacs really are brand new

Edit: apparently this dude was murdered. Cac probably chased him up those mountains.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,856
Reppin
the ether
Genes conferring light skin tones didn’t become prevalent until 4,000 to 3,000 years ago when early farmers started eating plant-based diets and didn’t get as much vitamin D from fish and meat as hunter-gathers did, Krause says.
White people only existed for 3000 years, but as a species we’ve existed for 300,000 years. Interesting stuff


The claim sounded iffy to me and I did some research, it definitely looks more complicated than that researcher's quote makes it appear.

It seems like modern light skin genes appeared somewhere between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago. The question is when they became "prevalent", and that appears to be disputed, plus they became prevalent in different parts of Europe at different times.

Also, the papers caution that you can't actually know a prehistoric person's skin color from their DNA, because you can only know which modern skin color genes they have. Since there are tons of genes in prehistoric DNA that we have no clue what their function was, it's possible they had light skin due to other genes which no longer exist.

Here's one visual of where different skin colors arose in Europe at different times - which again is controversial, because we don't know how unknown genes factor in.


1050px-Archaeogenetic_analysis_of_human_skin_pigmentation_in_Europe.jpg








 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,649
Reputation
-34,264
Daps
618,852
Reppin
The Deep State
The claim sounded iffy to me and I did some research, it definitely looks more complicated than that researcher's quote makes it appear.

It seems like modern light skin genes appeared somewhere between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago. The question is when they became "prevalent", and that appears to be disputed, plus they became prevalent in different parts of Europe at different times.

Also, the papers caution that you can't actually know a prehistoric person's skin color from their DNA, because you can only know which modern skin color genes they have. Since there are tons of genes in prehistoric DNA that we have no clue what their function was, it's possible they had light skin due to other genes which no longer exist.

Here's one visual of where different skin colors arose in Europe at different times - which again is controversial, because we don't know how unknown genes factor in.


1050px-Archaeogenetic_analysis_of_human_skin_pigmentation_in_Europe.jpg








right that sounds like a slight of hand...and we gotta be careful with what we mean by "dark skin"

I have no idea what that means.
 
Top