*edit*
Honestly, I can't give you a complete answer on that since I've only been in my industry for 5-6 years. I presume a good amount, most of the affects I've seen regarding automation has been in the form of internet (oriented) development and (internet) based companies and that can offer lower rates to customers; we've (recently) added a internet/online specific portion of the company, but we've brought on more labor (sensitive to automation LO's). This could be purely due to market conditions right now though Eventally, those jobs and even mine will be automated but it'll take a rapid advancement, and extremely cheaper Machine Learning/AI to happen quickly.
Robot could never take risks like a human. Only a human could see 99 % failure rate but still go full steam ahead cause of that 1% chance. They'll never beat us.
you're beaten when you put an odds to 99% to 1% eventually over time that 1% of 1% of 1% drops to close to 0.
statistically speaking that 1% chance is voided over a series of interactions. You basically ethered your own defense
Still a chance. We're people of hope. We'll never give up bruh.
whoever taught you how to (use) parenthesis should be shot in the face.
()
@Mook, i understand your sentiment but you could have made a better argument for it.
What did you say? I saw the mention.
whoever taught you how to (use) parenthesis should be shot in the face.
()
@Mook, i understand your sentiment but you could have made a better argument for it.
If you create a robot to be sentient , what human intervention would there be? Maybe one person who controls the robot I guess?
yes, so the way it will work with trucks is that you'll have 3+ semi trucks traveling in a convoy with a human sitting in the cab of the lead vehicle. that person can monitor during travel, call for help in case of breakdown or take over in case of emergency.
so again you're not COMPLETELY removing all human interaction, but you're lowering it by 75%+
whoever taught you how to (use) parenthesis should be shot in the face.
()
@Mook, i understand your sentiment but you could have made a better argument for it.
A robot would let a kid drown like in I-Robot if it made no mathematical sense to waste time saving them. Humans have empathy. I don’t like the idea of relying on robots. You’ll fukk around and end up like ol boy in Ex Machina.
And Musk isn't the only Silicon Valley titan to surface the idea.
Billionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has indicated his support for universal basic income as a way to inspire more entrepreneurial creativity.
"Let's face it: There is something wrong with our system when I can leave [Harvard] and make billions of dollars in 10 years, while millions of students can't afford to pay off their loans, let alone start a business," Zuckerberg said in his May 2017 commencement address at his alma mater. "Now it's our time to define a new social contract for our generation. We should explore ideas like universal basic income to give everyone a cushion to try new things."
And billionaire serial entrepreneur Richard Branson has said he supports investigating the idea for similar reasons to Musk.
"With the acceleration of [artificial intelligence] and other new technology ... the world is changing fast," Branson wrote in an August 2017 post. "A lot of exciting new innovations are going to be created, which will generate a lot of opportunities and a lot of wealth, but there is a real danger it could also reduce the amount of jobs. This will make experimenting with ideas like basic income even more important in the years to come."