WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    252

Big Jo

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
7,119
Reputation
1,255
Daps
16,276
Reppin
NULL


Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: 'It's a national security threat'​


by JACKSON WALKER | The National Desk

Tue, November 14th 2023, 5:47 PM EST


962b7144-125c-4efe-8180-119b8eb0b5a0-large16x9_AP23313051308510.jpg

Republican presidential candidate former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley speaks during a Republican presidential primary debate hosted by NBC News, Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023, at the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)

WASHINGTON (TND) — Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley says a lack of transparency over social media is becoming detrimental to the American population.
“When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithm,” Haley said during an interview with Fox News Tuesday. “Let us see why they’re pushing what they’re pushing.”


Haley continued, saying she fears a rise in anonymous social media accounts could lead to widespread misinformation and potentially pose a national security threat.
“Every person on social media should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat," she said. "When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots.”

Such a move would lead to an increase in “civility,” Haley believes.

“When they know their pastor, their family members can see it, it's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country," she said.

Haley's comments echoed similar sentimentsshared by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who recently called for a ban of popular social media platform TikTok over the increasing pro-Hamas content appearing on the service.

“They use it as a news aggregator," Sen. Hawley said of young people using TikTok. "And if you look at much of what is trending on TikTok, if you look at the volume of pro-Hamas, frankly, pro-genocidal content.”

This week, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul announcedthe state had “ramped up” its social media surveillance due to surging antisemitis. She described the recent treatment of Jewish New Yorkers as “painful.”

“It’s painful to me as the governor of this great state — that has been known for its diversity, and how we celebrate different cultures, different religions, different viewpoints — it’s painful to see the cruelty with which New Yorkers are treating each other," Gov. Hochul said. "Everywhere from college campuses, to our streets, to schools, to playgrounds, even as they’re entering their houses of worship."
Weirdly, I dont hate this. I get that level of regulation sounds invasive and appalling, but anonymous social media accts really are a major threat, when you look at misinformation/ collusion/ foreign countries posing as as citizens etc. Scams, sextortion, phishing, the list goes on. This really does need to be solved on some level.
 
Last edited:

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,346
Reputation
7,979
Daps
150,137
Weirdly, I dont hate this. That level is regulation sounds invasive and appalling, but anonymous social media accts really are a major threat, when you look at misinformation/ collusion/ foreign countries posing as as citizens etc. Scams, sextortion, phishing, the list goes on. This really does need to be solved on some level.

it won't work and is undoubtedly a slippery slope to increasing government surveillance powers.

the people who want to share their real identity will and the people who want to remain anonymous will continue to do so via decentralized networks or social media sites hosted overseas.
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
28,853
Reputation
5,058
Daps
126,793
Reppin
NULL


Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: 'It's a national security threat'​


by JACKSON WALKER | The National Desk

Tue, November 14th 2023, 5:47 PM EST


962b7144-125c-4efe-8180-119b8eb0b5a0-large16x9_AP23313051308510.jpg

Republican presidential candidate former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley speaks during a Republican presidential primary debate hosted by NBC News, Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023, at the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)

WASHINGTON (TND) — Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley says a lack of transparency over social media is becoming detrimental to the American population.
“When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithm,” Haley said during an interview with Fox News Tuesday. “Let us see why they’re pushing what they’re pushing.”


Haley continued, saying she fears a rise in anonymous social media accounts could lead to widespread misinformation and potentially pose a national security threat.
“Every person on social media should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat," she said. "When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots.”

Such a move would lead to an increase in “civility,” Haley believes.

“When they know their pastor, their family members can see it, it's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country," she said.

Haley's comments echoed similar sentimentsshared by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who recently called for a ban of popular social media platform TikTok over the increasing pro-Hamas content appearing on the service.

“They use it as a news aggregator," Sen. Hawley said of young people using TikTok. "And if you look at much of what is trending on TikTok, if you look at the volume of pro-Hamas, frankly, pro-genocidal content.”

This week, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul announcedthe state had “ramped up” its social media surveillance due to surging antisemitis. She described the recent treatment of Jewish New Yorkers as “painful.”

“It’s painful to me as the governor of this great state — that has been known for its diversity, and how we celebrate different cultures, different religions, different viewpoints — it’s painful to see the cruelty with which New Yorkers are treating each other," Gov. Hochul said. "Everywhere from college campuses, to our streets, to schools, to playgrounds, even as they’re entering their houses of worship."

Extend this to the Coli so we can finally find out who’s behind the Nap account. Unveil the names like a Scooby Doo episode.
 

Silky Johnson

The Master Investbreh
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,906
Reputation
290
Daps
5,416
Reppin
Hatersbridge, BX


Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: 'It's a national security threat'​


by JACKSON WALKER | The National Desk

Tue, November 14th 2023, 5:47 PM EST


962b7144-125c-4efe-8180-119b8eb0b5a0-large16x9_AP23313051308510.jpg

Republican presidential candidate former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley speaks during a Republican presidential primary debate hosted by NBC News, Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023, at the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)

WASHINGTON (TND) — Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley says a lack of transparency over social media is becoming detrimental to the American population.
“When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithm,” Haley said during an interview with Fox News Tuesday. “Let us see why they’re pushing what they’re pushing.”


Haley continued, saying she fears a rise in anonymous social media accounts could lead to widespread misinformation and potentially pose a national security threat.
“Every person on social media should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat," she said. "When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots.”

Such a move would lead to an increase in “civility,” Haley believes.

“When they know their pastor, their family members can see it, it's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country," she said.

Haley's comments echoed similar sentiments shared by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who recently called for a ban of popular social media platform TikTok over the increasing pro-Hamas content appearing on the service.

“They use it as a news aggregator," Sen. Hawley said of young people using TikTok. "And if you look at much of what is trending on TikTok, if you look at the volume of pro-Hamas, frankly, pro-genocidal content.”

This week, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul announced the state had “ramped up” its social media surveillance due to surging antisemitis. She described the recent treatment of Jewish New Yorkers as “painful.”

“It’s painful to me as the governor of this great state — that has been known for its diversity, and how we celebrate different cultures, different religions, different viewpoints — it’s painful to see the cruelty with which New Yorkers are treating each other," Gov. Hochul said. "Everywhere from college campuses, to our streets, to schools, to playgrounds, even as they’re entering their houses of worship."

I guess she would agree that anonymous Super PAC donars are also a threat to nat sec, right? :troll:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,346
Reputation
7,979
Daps
150,137

From Univision to MAGAVision: Network’s Softball Interview With Trump Betrays Latino Voters​

Raul ReyesNov 16th, 2023, 11:26 am

Trump Confronted By Univision Over 91 Felony Counts What If You Win 'Only To Be Forced To Drop Out Of The Race'

On Wednesday, longtime Univision anchor León Krauze resigned from the company, the largest Spanish-language TV network in the United States. While Krauze did not give a specific reason for his departure, his move comes in the aftermath of the network’s controversial interview with Donald Trump.

The Washington Post reported this week on the shifting relationship between Trump and Univision. On November 10, the network aired a one-hour primetime interview with the former president and did so under circumstances favorable to him. This was a marked change for the network known for its comprehensive coverage of U.S. immigration policy. In an unsigned statement to the Post, Univision said that the event “held significant importance for our audience.”

Univision’s new approach to Trump has generated widespread concern both within its news division and among media observers. The TV giant has long been a trusted source of news for millions of Americans who speak Spanish. Now, Univision’s leadership seems to be cozying up to the most anti-Latino president in modern American history. This represents a profound betrayal of the network’s core audience. As Ana Navarro-Cárdenas, co-host of ABC’s The View, posted on social media, “What the hell is going on at Univision?”

By journalistic standards, the arrangements surrounding Univision’s Trump interview appear questionable. According to the Post, the former president hosted three top network executives at Mar-a-Lago during the event. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, facilitated the interview and was present as well. Instead of a Univision anchor, the interview was conducted by Enrique Acevedo, a Televisa journalist based in Mexico City.

In the interview, Acevedo asked largely softball questions with little follow-up. His tone was deferential, and he didn’t even bring up immigration until the second half of the hour. He did not challenge Trump’s false claim that he had built his border wall and made Mexico pay for it, nor did he push back on Trump’s blaming Barack Obama for the family separations policy. Because Trump was dubbed into Spanish, it softened his extremism; it made his statements sound more muted and palatable.

As if this were not troubling enough, it gets worse. The Biden campaign paid for ads to air during the interview in Arizona, Nevada, Florida, and Pennsylvania markets. But Univision canceled them, citing a previously unannounced policy change against opposition advertising in single-candidate interviews. The network also nixed a scheduled interview with Biden’s Hispanic Media Director to respond to Trump, which would have aired during its late-night news.

This isn’t the first sign of Univision’s shift towards the right under its new ownership (the network merged with Mexican media company Grupo Televisa in 2022). Last year, the Post noted, Univision interrupted programming to cover Trump’s presidential campaign announcement live from Mar-a-Lago. In contrast, when President Biden gave a primetime address on Israel and Ukraine on October 19, the network cut away from his remarks midway through the speech and directed viewers to watch online.

Univision was right to assert that an interview with Trump was of interest to its viewers. About 34 million Latinos were eligible to vote in 2022, and a New York Times/Siena poll this month found that 42 percent of Latinos in battleground states support Trump. Yet, like any news outlet, Univision should be covering the former president with objectivity.

Given Univision’s power and stature in the Latino community, the network’s tilt towards Trump seems especially irresponsible and out of touch. Lest anyone forget, Trump called Mexican immigrants “rapists” and drug smugglers and threw paper towels at hurricane victims in Puerto Rico. He once tossed a Univision anchor out of a press conference for confronting him about immigration. Trump’s planned immigration policies (if re-elected) include huge detention camps for migrants and mass deportations.

Univision’s Trump interview reflected as poorly on the network as it did on Acevedo – and Spanish-speaking news consumers deserve better. How disappointing that the network that once held politicians of both parties accountable is now veering from Univision to MAGAvision.

On social media, Acevedo responded to criticism of his interview with Trump, posting in Spanish that “I am a reporter and my job is to ask questions. Information should be the protagonist here.”

Sadly, Acevedo has it wrong. As a journalist, his job is not only to ask questions, but to seek answers. And if there is any “protagonist” here, it is not information. The protagonist should be the truth.

Raul A. Reyes is a contributor to NBC Latino and CNN Opinion. You can follow him at X: @RaulAReyes, Instagram: @raulareyes1.

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,346
Reputation
7,979
Daps
150,137

Nikki Haley walks back 'verify everybody' social media proposal, wants free speech for 'anonymous Americans'​

Story by Hanna Panreck • 21h

AAxYqqB.img
FOX News
Nikki Haley asked to explain social media verification comments during CNBC interview


View on Watch View on Watch
Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley was asked to explain her earlier remarks about social media companies on Wednesday and said that while she didn't mind "anonymous American" free speech, she didn't support anonymous free speech for actors in Russia, Iran and China.

During an appearance on Fox News on Tuesday, Haley said every person on social media should be "verified by their name." Haley, who was fiercely criticized by fellow Republican candidates for the idea, joined the hosts of CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Wednesday and was asked to explain her comments after "heads exploded."

Haley said again she wanted social media companies to be transparent with Americans and show their algorithms.

"What I know, what anyone in intelligence [knows]… Russia, Iran and China, North Korea too, know that the cheapest form of warfare is to spread misinformation. Look at what happened with Israel. You want to know where all this pro-Hamas information is coming from? It is coming from foreign actors that are sowing chaos and division," she said.


GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley joins CNBC's Squawk Box on Wednesday, November 15, 2023. Screenshot/CNBC/SquawkBox

GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley joins CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Wednesday, November 15, 2023. Screenshot/CNBC/SquawkBox© Screenshot/CNBC/SquawkBox
BILL MAHER HYPES NIKKI HALEY AS VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO TRUMP: ‘SHE’S HAVING A MOMENT'

"I want freedom of speech for Americans. I don’t want freedom of speech for Russia and Hamas, and that’s what’s happening right now. So the way you fix that is we need our social media companies to verify everybody," she said.

READ ON THE FOX NEWS APP

CNBC host Joe Kernen interjected and suggested that she wasn't really saying people can't tweet or post to social media anonymously. Haley said that she believed life would be more "civil" if they were "able to do that," but said people should stand by what they say online.

"I don’t mind anonymous American people having free speech. What I don’t like is anonymous Russians and Chinese and Iranians having free speech," she said.

On Tuesday, Haley said everyone on social media should be verified by name.

"When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithms. Let us see why they're pushing what they're pushing. The second thing is every person on social media should be verified by their name," Haley said on Fox News.


Nikki Haley, former ambassador to the United Nations and 2024 Republican presidential candidate, during the Republican primary presidential debate hosted by Fox Business Network in Simi Valley, California, US, on Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2023. Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Nikki Haley, former ambassador to the United Nations and 2024 Republican presidential candidate, during the Republican primary presidential debate hosted by Fox Business Network in Simi Valley, California, US, on Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2023. Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images© Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
WITH 9 WEEKS TO GO UNTIL THE FIRST VOTES, TRUMP REMAINS COMMANDING FRONT-RUNNER AS GOP FIELD KEEPS SHRINKING

Haley described it as a national security threat, and took heat from fellow Republican candidates, Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., and Vivek Ramaswamy.

"When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say. And it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots. And then you're going to get some civility when people know their name is next to what they say, and they know their pastor and their family members are going to see it," she said.

DeSantis called Haley's proposal dangerous and said it would be dead on arrival in his administration.


Gov. Ron DeSanits, Vivek Ramaswamy and Sen. Tim Scott participate in second Republican debate. Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Gov. Ron DeSanits, Vivek Ramaswamy and Sen. Tim Scott participate in second Republican debate. Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images© Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
"You know who were anonymous writers back in the day? Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison when they wrote the Federalist Papers. They were not ‘national security threats,’ nor are the many conservative Americans across the country who exercise their Constitutional right to voice their opinions without fear of being harassed or canceled by the school they go to or the company they work for," DeSantis wrote on social media.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
52,346
Reputation
7,979
Daps
150,137




We Talked to Some Kamala-but-Not-Joe Voters. Here’s What They Said.​

A slice of voters would vote for Vice President Harris but not President Biden, reflecting his challenges and opportunities.


By Claire Cain Miller and Nate Cohn

In reporting for this article, Claire Cain Miller spoke to 11 poll respondents who said they would support Kamala Harris for president but not Joe Biden.

Nov. 16, 2023Updated 11:25 a.m. ET


00up-kamala-voters-02-hwgm-superJumbo.jpg

Bridgette Miro, 52, a retired state employee in Glendale, Ariz., is a Republican, but said she would vote for President Biden because Kamala Harris was on the ticket.Credit...Adriana Zehbrauskas for The New York Times

In our recent poll of voters in battleground states, we asked how people would vote if Kamala Harris were running for president. Though Donald J. Trump still led in this hypothetical matchup, Vice President Harris performed slightly better than President Biden.

She did particularly well among young and nonwhite voters — voters who were a key to Mr. Biden’s 2020 victory but who the poll suggests are less supportive of him this time.


She did particularly well among young and nonwhite voters — voters who were a key to Mr. Biden’s 2020 victory but who the poll suggests are less supportive of him this time.

The voters who backed her but not Mr. Biden — about 5 percent of swing-state voters — would have given Mr. Biden the lead in the New York Times/Siena polls if they had supported him.

We called back some of these Harris supporters to understand why they didn’t support Mr. Biden, and whether he could win them over.


They show the serious challenges Mr. Biden faces. Some said he was too old, or they didn’t think he’d done much as president. Black voters in particular said they didn’t believe he was doing enough to help Black Americans.

They also point to the opportunities for Mr. Biden. Though many said they’d probably vote for Mr. Trump, nearly all said that they weren’t excited about either option, and that Mr. Trump had personally offended them. For some, Democratic messaging on issues important to them, like abortion and the economy, hadn’t reached them.

In a telling indication of how unsettled voters remain with a year to go, many of them expressed different opinions during the follow-up interviews than they did during the survey. In response to neutral questions, some who had said they were unsure became more sure of their support for either candidate by the end of the interview, and others switched their support after recalling their impressions of both candidates and talking more about their priority issues.


A telephone call with a New York Times reporter is not the same as a conversation with friends or family. It’s not the same as a campaign advertisement, either. But it was an opportunity for a group of voters, some of them relatively disengaged, to think about the candidates, issues and campaigns.

Here’s how the Harris supporters broke down:

Harris superfans​

If Ms. Harris were running for president, Bridgette Miro, 52, a retired state employee in Glendale, Ariz., who is Black, would vote for her “one hundred thousand percent.”


She likes the work Ms. Harris did in California, where she was attorney general and a U.S. senator before she became vice president. She likes “the way she handles herself.” She likes that “her skin color is like my skin color.”


In the poll and at the beginning of the interview, Ms. Miro said she would vote for Mr. Trump this election. She’s a Republican who said “I don’t have any feeling at all” about the job Mr. Biden has done as president. But by the end, she had switched her support to Mr. Biden, after recalling her negative views about Mr. Trump, who she said was racist and didn’t do enough to prevent police violence against Black people.
“All of my frustration comes from the killing of Black individuals,” she said. “If we can have just someone in office who can control the police force just a little bit, that gives us a little bit of hope.”

And then there was Ms. Harris: “If she’s on the ticket, I’m going to vote for her. It’s Kamala versus everybody.”

‘She’s a Black woman’​

“I just think she has a lot more to offer than the standard straight old white dude,” said a 40-year-old artist in Georgia, who declined to share her name because she feared blowback given the country’s polarization. “I like the idea of a female lawyer.”


A lifelong Democrat, she said in the poll that she would vote for Mr. Trump over Mr. Biden, whom she called “too old and a bit out of touch” and “a bit of a doofus.” Yet she believes the problems in the country had more to do with gerrymandered congressional districts than with Mr. Biden. By the end of the interview, she said she “will likely vote for him again — I’m just not happy about it.”


Antonio Maxon, 25, a garbage collector and Ms. Harris supporter in Farrell, Pa., considers himself a Democrat. But he plans to vote for Mr. Trump because “he’s helped out countless Black people.”

Antonio Maxon, 25, a garbage collector and Ms. Harris supporter in Farrell, Pa., considers himself a Democrat. But he plans to vote for Mr. Trump because “he’s helped out countless Black people.”Credit...Justin Merriman for The New York Times


Antonio Maxon, 25, a garbage collector in Farrell, Pa., still plans to vote for Mr. Trump. But he likes Ms. Harris for a simple reason: “She’s a Black woman.” He said he lost faith in the political system after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016. It’s important to him, he said, “just to see a female, a woman in power, being that I was raised mostly by females.” He added, “My father was not there, my mother raised me, my grandmother raised me.”

Crime and police violence​

For some Black voters, Ms. Harris’s racial identity matters not only for representation, but because they say it gives her an understanding of the issues they face. It highlights a factor that may be driving some Black people from the Democratic Party. For years, it was seen as advancing the interests of Black voters, but these voters said Mr. Biden hadn’t done enough, while a Black president may have.

“I feel like she would probably do more for us, because I feel like there’s not enough being done for Black people,” said Sonji Dunbar, 32, a program specialist for the Boys and Girls Club in Columbus, Ga. “I stay in a very urban area, there’s crime, so I feel like she could influence more programs to at least get that crime rate down, address police brutality.”

Not Joe Biden​

“Honestly, it was more of a choice of it just not being Joe Biden,” said Clara Carrillo-Hinojosa, a 21-year-old financial analyst in Las Vegas, of her support for Ms. Harris. She said she would probably vote for Mr. Trump: “Personally, I think we were doing a lot better when he was in the presidency, price-wise, money-wise, income-wise.”

Yet in some ways, Ms. Carrillo-Hinojosa is the kind of voter Mr. Biden hopes he can win once people start focusing on the race. Mr. Trump has offended her as a woman, she said, and she likes some of what Mr. Biden has done, including his support for Israel.

Most of all, she said, she strongly supports abortion rights — and did not realize that Mr. Biden does, too. She said that because states’ abortion bans had gone into effect during his presidency, she assumed it was because of him. Ultimately, despite her misgivings about the economy, support for abortion rights would probably be what decided her vote, she said.

Mr. Maxon, the 25-year-old garbage collector in Pennsylvania, considers himself a Democrat, though this election would be his first time voting. The Israel-Hamas war has made him doubt Mr. Biden’s handling of foreign affairs, and he recalls policies under Mr. Trump that helped him.
“My biggest thing is not seeing America fall in shambles,” he said. “With this war I think Biden is way too lenient — with Hamas, Iran, Iraq, the whole nine yards. What I like about Trump is he was keeping everybody at bay and not wanting to mess with America.”


Mr. Maxon, who is Black, said Mr. Trump had made racist remarks, yet he plans to vote for him. “He’s helped out countless Black people, more than Biden did by a landslide,” he said. Specifically, he said, it was through pandemic unemployment assistance and other relief funding at the start of the pandemic (the Biden administration also distributed relief funding).

No good option​

Ms. Dunbar, the 32-year-old from Georgia, is a Democrat, but did not have positive things to say about either candidate, and is unsure whom to vote for.

“I don’t know too much or hear too much about what he’s doing,” she said of Mr. Biden’s presidency. She leaned toward Mr. Trump in the poll, but in the interview she said he seemed to carry too much baggage — comments he’s made about women, generalizations about racial or ethnic groups, the indictments against him.

She says it’s important to vote, even when on the fence. Democrats have one thing going for them, she said: support for the issue most important to her, women’s rights.

“Abortion comes into play with that,” she said. “I still like women to have their own choice with what to do with their bodies. And the way things have gone, it’s an agenda on women, period. Not just Black women, but women in general.”
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
99,297
Reputation
13,411
Daps
289,894
Reppin
NULL

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,913
Reputation
6,036
Daps
62,568
Reppin
San Diego
Several of the economy-related trends getting traction on TikTok are downright dire. The term “Silent Depression” recently spawned a spate of viral videos. Clips critical of capitalism are common. On Instagram, jokes about poor housing affordability are a genre unto themselves.

Social media reflects — and is potentially fueling — a deep-seated angst about the economy that is showing up in surveys of younger consumers and political polls alike. It suggests that even as the job market booms, people are focusing on long-running issues like housing affordability as they assess the economy.
“I think people have gotten angrier,” she said. “I think we’re actually in a worse vibecession now.”
 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
32,847
Reputation
1,406
Daps
61,062
Reppin
got a call for three nines
We need to stop this narrative that polling only occurs with retirees on landlines. Polling outlets
have been contacting cellphones for years now.

Retirees with cellphones then?

Polling data is wildly inaccurate at this point

Also cell phones have automatic call blocking and screening now as well
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
99,297
Reputation
13,411
Daps
289,894
Reppin
NULL


tell me that jesus or allah or buddah or whoever is gonna end this fukkin conflict before 2024, so biden doesn't have to defend this in an election year :snoop:
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,028
Reputation
5,887
Daps
163,366

I am so exhausted with social media
Why would you link this article?

The only thing it says is going well is the “booming job market,” but what does that mean when real income has dropped. It points out affordable housing and the inflation in food and gas prices, but some how doesn’t think it is that serious.

Tiktok is definitely misguided but that article also has a misguided view.
 
Top