But they can't find shyt on Harris. Pearl clutching hard
But they can't find shyt on Harris. Pearl clutching hard
They’re using people who are “likely” voters only. You know nikkas be like - “yeah I might not even pull up fam.”That can't be right, HL told me that Biden was the only hope of beating Trump
Yeah no, there's absolutely no way Kamala only gets 72% of the black vote she easily gets 85% and quite possibly >90%
Not sure what's up with polls these days overestimating how many black people will vote Republican. Biden got 87% of the black vote and Hillary got 89% - I don't buy for a second that Kamala is going to underperform them, especially to that degree.
Black Republicans do usually love attention so maybe they just have a high response rate to polls or something.
Disappointed it’s not Beshear but glad it’s not ShapiroExact same thing happened with Vance
I said this earlier, but VP candidates are used to sure up a weakness a candidate has. At times in the past it has been a state but not usually for Democrats in recent times. Walz speaks well to rural voters and the type of person Democrats lost and to the progressive wing. He doesn’t win you rural America but he may just help you get closer to losing by the margins Obama did. And that can be the difference in an election. You don’t need Shapiro on the ticket to win PA.I would prefer Shapiro due to PA being more important than Minn, or Kelly since he's flew combat missions and was an astronaut, but I guess walz couldn't be the worst pick. It's still a better decision than JD Vance
I said this earlier, but VP candidates are used to sure up a weakness a candidate has. At times in the past it has been a state but not usually for Democrats in recent times. Walz speaks well to rural voters and the type of person Democrats lost and to the progressive wing. He doesn’t win you rural America but he may just help you get closer to losing by the margins Obama did. And that can be the difference in an election. You don’t need Shapiro on the ticket to win PA.