2022 Study of Black Law Students released in Berkeley Law Journal

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,620
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,667
Reppin
Above the fray.

In what may be a first, study publishes empirical data about Black law students’ race and ethnicity​

June 13, 2022


scales of justice

Image from Shutterstock.

People with two U.S. born, non-Hispanic Black parents comprise 11.71% of the general population, but only 6.34% of law students, according to a law review article recently published in the Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy.


Titled Racial and Ethnic Ancestry of the Nation’s Black Law Students: An Analysis of Data from the LSSSE Survey, the article bases its research on data from the Law School Survey of Student Engagement and the American Community Survey’s Public Use Microdata Sample. It was written by Kevin Brown and Kenneth Dau-Schmidt, both of whom are professors at Indiana University Bloomington’s Maurer School of Law.


According to the authors, this is the first empirical data published on Black law students’ race and ethnicity. Besides a category for those with two U.S.-born Black parents, referred to as “Ascendant Blacks,” the study classifies “Successive Blacks,” which included students with immigrant parents, Black Hispanics and Black multiracial students who identify as being two or more races.


Black Hispanics comprise 0.81% of the total population and 0.71% of law students, the article states. Black immigrants make up 2.8% of the general population and 2.89% of law students, while Black multiracial students represent 1.63% of the general population and 1.43% of law students.


For students with two Black parents born in the U.S., a distinction from other groups is that their ancestors suffered through slavery and segregation, Dau-Schmidt and Brown wrote. The same was true for half of Black students, at most, in the other categories, the two estimated.


“Thus, our core assumption is that by virtue of their ancestry, in general, Ascendant Blacks have been more negatively affected by the history of racial oppression in the United States than any of the groups of Successive Blacks and, thus, have more experience with the impact of that history,” they wrote.


The authors also looked at gender.


“In each group of Black people, the men show substantial underrepresentation in comparison with the women in their group, and Ascendant Black men are the most underrepresented with a ratio of 0.40,” the authors wrote. “This means that law schools would have to enroll almost two and a half times as many Ascendant Black males as are currently enrolled in order for Ascendant Black males to achieve parity in law schools with their representation in the general population.”


Their research also found that for law students with two U.S.-born non-Hispanic Black parents, there was a 25.9% poverty rate. Comparatively, the poverty rate was 22.2% for those who identified as Black Hispanics, 16.6% for students with Black immigrant parents, and 17.3% for students who are part-Black. For white students, the poverty rate was 7.5%.


Parents’ educations were examined, too. Among all Black students, at least 12.3% had parents with professional degrees or PhDs. Comparatively, among the general population, only 4.1% of people between the ages of 42 and 49 have professional degrees or PhDs, according to the article.


“A quick review reveals both that class is very important in attendance of law school and that there are real socioeconomic differences among the various groups of Black law students. First, in comparing the distribution of parents’ educational achievement for each group with the distribution for the general population, we see that the parents of the students in all of the examined groups are, on average, much more educated than the general population,” the authors wrote.


Among all groups of Black law students at the top-50 ranked schools, undergraduate grade-point averages were between 3.36 and 3.5, according to the article. For students with LSAT scores above 155, 7.5% had two Black parents born in the U.S., compared to 16.7% of Black Hispanics, 10.9% of Black immigrants and 20.4% of students who were multiracial.

=================================================
(Abstract and full study are in the second post)

@BigMan @DPresidential @EndDomination @ogc163

* ED, I have a related story about the late Lani Guinier
 
Last edited:

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,620
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,667
Reppin
Above the fray.



ABSTRACT
Racial and Ethnic Ancestry of the Nation's Black Law Students: An Analysis of Data from the LSSSE Survey

Kevin D. Brown, Indiana University Maurer School of LawFollow
Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Indiana University Maurer School of LawFollow

Document Type​

Article

Publication Date​

2022

Publication Citation​

22 Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy 1 (2022)

Abstract​

This article proceeds in three substantive parts. In Part I, we discuss the changing racial and ethnic ancestries of Black people in the United States since affirmative action began. In Part II, we discuss the LSSSE data set that we use along with our weighting procedure based on the ABA data. Also in Part II, we discuss the Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), a subset of the American Community Survey (ACS). We use the ACS PUMS to provide comparative national data to analyze the relative representation of each group of Blacks among law students. In Part III, we present the primary results of this study. It is the heart of the article and deserves further exposition.

In the first section of Part III, we present socioeconomic data on each of the examined groups to explain why we have separated them for analysis. Our primary assumptions are that Ascendant Blacks have more experience with the history of racial discrimination in the US and that this history has impacted them more. We point to differences in a number of socioeconomic factors that provide some support for these assumptions.

In the second section of Part III, we use the LSSSE and ACS PUMS data to examine the relative representation of Ascendant and each group of Successive Blacks among law students and compare that with the relative representation of non-Hispanic, non-immigrant, non-multiracial White people, who we will refer to as “Whites.” We find that, save for Black Immigrants, Ascendant and Successive Blacks are underrepresented in law schools in comparison to their percentage in the population and that this underrepresentation is the most pronounced for Ascendant Blacks. Similarly, we examine the proportionate representation of Ascendant and Successive Blacks among students at top 50 law schools in the LSSSE survey and find that all of these groups are more underrepresented in top 50 law schools than in law schools in general and that once again this underrepresentation is greatest for Ascendant Blacks. We then discuss various “pipeline” issues that may contribute to this underrepresentation, including completion of a college degree, undergraduate grades and LSAT scores.

In the third section of Part III, we use the LSSSE and ACS PUMS data to examine each group’s representation by gender. Given that for the past 30 years, over 60% of undergraduate degrees earned by Black people have gone to women,6 we document the gross underrepresentation of men for all groups of Black people in law school when compared to their percentage in the general population. Indeed, we find that all of the underrepresentation suffered by Black people in law schools is suffered by Black men and Ascendant Black women. Again, we examine attendance in top 50 law schools and consider potential pipeline issues, this time with an eye toward differences associated with gender. We find that Black men suffer greater underrepresentation among top 50 law school students and suffer greater pipeline issues, except that Black men score higher on the LSAT.

Finally, in the fourth section of Part III, we examine the impact of class on Ascendant and Successive Blacks by examining the distribution of parental educational achievement for each group and estimating the payoff for each group in the percent of law students achieved for the parent’s generation that attains a given level of educational accomplishment. Corresponding numbers are calculated for Whites for purposes of comparison. We find that both Ascendant and Successive Blacks suffer relative to Whites due to a comparative lack of parental educational achievement, and a lower payoff in percent of law students for parental educational achievement, but that Ascendant Blacks suffer the most. Interestingly, with respect to the payoff in law students for parental educational achievement, we find that both Black people and Whites with low parental educational achievement attend law school at approximately the same (very low) rate. However, among those who enjoy the advantage of high parental educational achievement, Whites enjoy a significantly higher payoff than Black people in terms of the percent of law students resulting from a percent of the parents’ generation who achieve graduate degrees, although both Black people and Whites are much more likely to go to law school than the progeny of parents with low educational achievement. Apparently, at least with respect to attending law school, the advantages enjoyed by Whites accrue to the children of the higher educated to a significantly greater extent than they do to Black people

@Lotsford
 
Last edited:

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
ADOS lackin in this regard...I wish there was a study in how Ascendant Blacks have been more negatively affected by the history of racial oppression in the United States than any of the groups of Successive Blacks. I'm talking about a psychological study on the groups.

I also found it very interesting that parents with advanced educations were overrepresented among Blacks.


People with two U.S. born, non-Hispanic Black parents comprise 11.71% of the general population, but only 6.34% of law students, according to a law review article recently published in the Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy.

Black Hispanics comprise 0.81% of the total population and 0.71% of law students, the article states. Black immigrants make up 2.8% of the general population and 2.89% of law students, while Black multiracial students represent 1.63% of the general population and 1.43% of law students.

Parents’ educations were examined, too. Among all Black students, at least 12.3% had parents with professional degrees or PhDs. Comparatively, among the general population, only 4.1% of people between the ages of 42 and 49 have professional degrees or PhDs, according to the article.
 
Top