So are you saying Jones played well enough for us to win last night? A game where the Giants scored zero touchdowns? Adding to his tally of games where he threw no touchdowns.
Keep in mind that this is the same Giants team that lost a game where they scored 3 offensive TDs and held the other side to zero TDs of any kind this season.
Anyway, I'm just saying he didn't cost y'all the game. He wasn't why you lost. To me, an effective QB doesn't HAVE to be the reason we win. He just can't be why we lose.
Understandably, you want him to be the reason you won because a good amount of things went right for the Giants last night that typically don't go right, so the table was set for Jones to take the W.
On the drive where they had their last realistic chance -- because the game was over once Nabers was ruled out -- Jones made good throws that his WRs could have made plays on (and supposedly, NYG's WRs lead the league in drops or dropped pass percentage). Making a good throw for your guy in late-game moments is the extent of his job in that situation.
I'd also say that I think it's wild that Daniel Jones -- who is not what I'd call a good QB or whatever -- catches so much heat for his struggles when the Giants have fukked this man's development at nearly every turn. They just now got him a bonafide WR1. When they could have kept Saquon, they showed him the door. Won't even get into the OL mess.
Again, there's not much impressive about Daniel Jones. But the Giants front office itself has admitted it failed to adequately support him from a surrounding cast standpoint.