When The Next Democratic Candidate Is Palling Around With D1ck Cheney What Will You Liberals Do?

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,036
Reputation
1,745
Daps
61,389
Reppin
Everywhere
clinton-kissinger-2-article-header.jpg



Will you disqualify them or will you tell people that we need to be pragmatic and fight on the next one :jbhmm:
 

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,036
Reputation
1,745
Daps
61,389
Reppin
Everywhere
That would be reaching across the aisle, and finding compromise in order to build bridges not wall :ehh:#ImWithHer
So would the next candidate showing countries the best way to frack their earth while the climate gets worse be a show of great foreign and expierence? Hypothetically of course :ehh:
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,266
Reputation
1,920
Daps
42,538
Vote third party next election, assuming a Trump-like candidate isn't nominated on the Republican side :yeshrug:

What you Trumpbots have to understand is that most people voting for Hillary don't actually like her, they're just prescient enough to realize that this year, your candidate is so objectively terrible that she is the only rational option. You'd have more luck wedging and convincing people to vote for Republicans if Trump wasn't such an asshat with dangerous ideas. :francis:

Its your own fault for nominating that orange buffoon. In fact, supporting him in the primary was probably the single most important technical action towards making Hillary POTUS. Congratulations, you played yourselves.
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,580
Vote third party next election, assuming a Trump-like candidate isn't nominated on the Republican side :yeshrug:

What you Trumpbots have to understand is that most people voting for Hillary don't actually like her, they're just prescient enough to realize that this year, your candidate is so objectively terrible that she is the only rational option. You'd have more luck wedging and convincing people to vote for Republicans if Trump wasn't such an asshat with dangerous ideas. :francis:

Its your own fault for nominating that orange buffoon. In fact, supporting him in the primary was probably the single most important technical action towards making Hillary POTUS. Take that to the bank, you played yourselves.
@StatUS is a social democrat.
 

Saka

Pro
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
995
Reputation
105
Daps
1,833
Any honest observer will note that the scare tactic of voting for the lesser of two evils has been heavily used his decade across the west (look into the Canadian and Australian general elections) :jbhmm: the "lesser" of two evils in this case feigns a move to the left during the campaign but once their in office they will revert back to the modus operandi of neo-liberal policies, that are heavily weighted in favor of the bourgeois class.
 

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,036
Reputation
1,745
Daps
61,389
Reppin
Everywhere
Vote third party next election, assuming a Trump-like candidate isn't nominated on the Republican side :yeshrug:

What you Trumpbots have to understand is that most people voting for Hillary don't actually like her, they're just prescient enough to realize that this year, your candidate is so objectively terrible that she is the only rational option. You'd have more luck wedging and convincing people to vote for Republicans if Trump wasn't such an asshat with dangerous ideas. :francis:

Its your own fault for nominating that orange buffoon. In fact, supporting him in the primary was probably the single most important technical action towards making Hillary POTUS. Congratulations, you played yourselves.
Another question. If and when the GOP nominates someone worse than Trump and the opposition to them is telling people that Wall Street is best at regulating themselves will you be voting third party or for the person who people are being told has a better chance to win in this current system?
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,192
Reputation
41
Daps
14,831
Another question. If and when the GOP nominates someone worse than Trump and the opposition to them is telling people that Wall Street is best at regulating themselves will you be voting third or for the person who has a a better chance to win in this current system?

If the third party remains to be just as god damn aloof, retarded, and incompetent....most likely yes.
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,580
Another question. If and when the GOP nominates someone worse than Trump and the opposition to them is telling people that Wall Street is best at regulating themselves will you be voting third party or for the person who people are be told has a better chance to win in this current system?
In that case, he will vote pragmatically and wait for the election after that. Then after that, after that, after that, after that and so on. Perhaps in 50 years the greater evil won't be sufficiently bad and a third party vote will be possible :ehh:
 

StatUS

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,036
Reputation
1,745
Daps
61,389
Reppin
Everywhere
If the third party remains to be just as god damn aloof, retarded, and incompetent....most likely yes.
I see I see. So if the party that's supposed to represent you continues to do things like the party that doesn't then you'll kick the can down the road for the rest of time?

This is hypothetical of course :whoa:, this possible party you support could change drastically at anytime.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,192
Reputation
41
Daps
14,831
I see I see. So if the party that's supposed to represent you continues to do things like the party that doesn't then you'll kick the can down the road for the rest of time?

This is hypothetical of course :whoa:, this possible party you support could change drastically at anytime.

Doing things that are against my interest is not necessarily the same as governing center to left.

Reading the leaked Clinton emails (the ones that show Clinton speaking) don't really reveal someone adament about screwing people over or doing shady things. It seems like someone fairly pragmatic in her approach and willing to consider reasonable solutions.

The far-left like you feel pragamtism is a form of selling out and think radical shifts in political paradigms mean "improvement". So far I disagree.

I'm not sure about the approach of the populist yet. I don't think you guys have the right temperament to address the problems in a effective way. I've seen what became of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street and its sickening.

So until the Democratic Party becomes modern day Republican Party they will be my home til further notice.
 
Top