Here it is, the official "this ain't gonna get no coverage in the mainstream European/Jewish owned media" thread.
Post Ferguson it's clear without a doubt that mainstream media outlets pick and chose what they cover and which narrative they push when they position what they cover.
With that said, after every "event" (real or staged) we have the same petty ah-ha moment from our coli brothers and sisters
"Why they not talking about this on the news?"
"See bruh, they don't care about us"
"Stay woke yall"
So on and so forth. So since we have realized (collectively) the mainstream media is flawed in their skewing of what they cover...
why do we consistently rely on them to tell our stories?
What emotional thrill do we get out of he machine recognizing that it's flawed?
The system understands it's process. Do we understand the system?
Is there some sort of emotional thrill you would get if Don Lemon admits racism exists and CACs hate nikkas? Would it solve systemic Issues that have plagued people for hundreds of years?
CNN/Fox/CBS/MSN doesn't care to position universal truths, when they can play on their audiences fears and emotions by giving life to stereotypes that keep us all divided?
Just some food for thought. We should stop looking for empathy, sympathy, and validation from our enemies.
Mainstream media is flawed. European ran media doesn't care to push an ingenious agenda so every time we have an "event" or a "moment" and you get the euro-cacus perspective
- stop subsricing to it
- stop identityin with it
- stop getting upset (when you have a clear understanding) when you see the agenda in play
- stop looking for fairness in accuracy in the way it's reported
- stop being surprised when the same narratives are upheld to maintain the status quo (which is their dominance under Roman rule)
After all the wisdom being passed between us post Ferguson some of us are still looking for lip service from our enemies like it's going to solve our problems.
fukk @PhonZhi
Post Ferguson it's clear without a doubt that mainstream media outlets pick and chose what they cover and which narrative they push when they position what they cover.
With that said, after every "event" (real or staged) we have the same petty ah-ha moment from our coli brothers and sisters
"Why they not talking about this on the news?"
"See bruh, they don't care about us"
"Stay woke yall"
So on and so forth. So since we have realized (collectively) the mainstream media is flawed in their skewing of what they cover...
why do we consistently rely on them to tell our stories?
What emotional thrill do we get out of he machine recognizing that it's flawed?
The system understands it's process. Do we understand the system?
Is there some sort of emotional thrill you would get if Don Lemon admits racism exists and CACs hate nikkas? Would it solve systemic Issues that have plagued people for hundreds of years?
CNN/Fox/CBS/MSN doesn't care to position universal truths, when they can play on their audiences fears and emotions by giving life to stereotypes that keep us all divided?
Just some food for thought. We should stop looking for empathy, sympathy, and validation from our enemies.
Mainstream media is flawed. European ran media doesn't care to push an ingenious agenda so every time we have an "event" or a "moment" and you get the euro-cacus perspective
- stop subsricing to it
- stop identityin with it
- stop getting upset (when you have a clear understanding) when you see the agenda in play
- stop looking for fairness in accuracy in the way it's reported
- stop being surprised when the same narratives are upheld to maintain the status quo (which is their dominance under Roman rule)
After all the wisdom being passed between us post Ferguson some of us are still looking for lip service from our enemies like it's going to solve our problems.
fukk @PhonZhi
Last edited: