Sony Sacrificed the PlayStation 4 Camera to Beat Microsoft on Price

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,850
Reputation
2,692
Daps
43,813
Sony Sacrificed the PlayStation 4 Camera to Beat Microsoft on Price - IGN

When Sony announced that PlayStation 4 would be priced at $399 to an uproar of applause from the audience at its E3 press conference, it secured a critical edge over the Xbox One. But the advantage came at a cost: the PlayStation 4 camera (formerly known as the PlayStation 4 Eye). According to multiple sources, in the months leading up to E3, Sony nixed plans to include the camera add-on with every system and shave $100 off its originally planned price of $499. Most importantly, it did so quietly, informing its retail partners only of the removal of the camera, not specifying the lower price so as not to tip its hand to Microsoft.

But in its efforts to undercut the Xbox One, Sony has damned the accessory to a future of fragmented consumer adoption and inconsistent software support. The decision has also rendered a major design element of the DualShock 4 controller — the built-in LED Move tracker — largely useless.

Microsoft's decision to bundle a Kinect with each Xbox One and require it for use may be unpopular, but it guarantees that every user will have the option to try Kinect-enabled games and experiences. For developers, it means that Kinect integration is no longer a costly gamble on a small subsection of Xbox owners — motion-detecting and voice-sensing elements can be anything from a small optional game enhancement or the primary control method.

By relegating the camera to a $59.99 add-on, Sony has ensured the opposite — a climate of codependency wherein PlayStation 4 camera adoption will hinge upon compelling software, but compelling software will only arrive after PlayStation 4 camera adoption.

What's worse, the DualShock 4's integrated LEDs are now good for little more than visual flair. Per Sony, the light-up panels will help indicate the player associated with each controller and, when supported, react to in-game cues, such as blinking red when a player is low on health. Ultimately, the limited functionality of the LEDs without the aid of the Eye won't impact the player experience or even drastically diminish the overall battery life of the controller, but it's a lingering reminder of Sony's failure to support the tech.

ps4eye_01-610x405.jpg


It's possible that Sony has long-term aspirations for the PlayStation 4 camera and the DualShock 4's integrated Move technology — the PS4 is likely to be a 10 year console, after all — but launch window support is likely to be non-existent. The device was little more than a footnote at the console's debut in February and of the more than 40 demos Sony showcased at E3, Drive Club and a tech demo Playroom were the only PlayStation 4 titles were camera-enabled.

At present, Sony's abandonment of the Eye in favor of a lower priced PlayStation 4 seems to be paying off — the company claims to be boosting internal sales estimates and online retailers are reporting record breaking pre-sales — but will it be able to incentivize consumers and developers to adopt the device in the future? The odds are seemingly stacked against it, but perhaps Sony has a killer app waiting in the wings.
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Honolulu Blue Ski Mask Way
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
21,897
Reputation
4,858
Daps
60,707
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
Eventually, price comes down. That's why I understood the rationale of including Blu-Ray in the PS3. Additionally, the XB1 doesn't cost $900 like the PS3 did. If you want something to be a standard, it can't be an accessory. I'm one of those that loves the Kinect and I can't wait for the second version of it.
 

satam55

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
45,189
Reputation
4,893
Daps
89,059
Reppin
DFW Metroplex

Good!!!!!! I can save money at launch, than buy the camera at a later date if necessary.

I don't even know why this is newsworthy, I thought this was obvious. I even mentioned a month ago that there was rumor on NeoGAF (from a respected poster that has sources with Sony) that the PS4 Camera would be dropped to keep the price down, and that's exactly what happened.

But I do think in the future when the price of the Hardware in the PS4 comes down enough, the PS4 Camera will be bundled with all PS4s.
 

ChrisDorner

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
12,458
Reputation
1,390
Daps
20,232
Reppin
Hell
Atleast we have the option.. If we want it we can get it, it isn't shoved down our throats.

I can't see how this is a bad thing
 

PIFF101

Bring back the Golden Era
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,280
Reputation
2,716
Daps
26,150
Reppin
The Mecca of HipHop
Good. Should not be included because it will up the retail price for the PS4 including a peripheral we won't use often. Well played.
 

kash10003

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
10,535
Reputation
1,040
Daps
13,625
Reppin
NULL
they could have kept it bundled and priced it $40 lower than the xb1, i feel like people still would have copped and given msft shyt
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
1,659
Reputation
20
Daps
938
Reppin
NULL
This is a good thing. Hardcore gamers don't give a fukk about a camera. And I don't want to be forced to use it.
 

Raiders

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
4,491
Reputation
2,026
Daps
8,779
I am glad xbox is forces the kinect on others, it gives devs more options to make better games for me, I could not care less about those who dont want kinect, and I wish PS4 would have kept the eye even tho I dont think it can touch the kinet 2.0 because that is the only way I would get one, and its going to stop devs from adding things in games that could benefit me.
 

backbreaker65

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,670
Reputation
-425
Daps
10,372
Reppin
The Passage of Time
I'm in the camp wanting the camera to be packed with the PS4. I love gimmicky shyt. But this article is filled with inaccuracies.

The decision to sell the camera separately was made well in advance of E3. When you get to watch the Dual Shock 4 trailer released in May, at the end of the trailer it states the camera was sold separately

iJgqRWP.png



Also his math is very bad, how does a camera that retails for 60 bucks make the console a 100 dollars cheaper when the price is 399 without it? This sounds like an opinion piece without sources.

Again I'm in the Camera camp but his math is fishy.
 

kash10003

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
10,535
Reputation
1,040
Daps
13,625
Reppin
NULL
idk, if i would cop, i would cop it with the eye, esp if they drop that playroom shyt no homo
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
45,142
Reputation
3,758
Daps
68,407
Reppin
Michigan
Atleast we have the option.. If we want it we can get it, it isn't shoved down our throats.

I can't see how this is a bad thing
it fragments the market and market developers more reluctant to utilize it. there doesn't really need to be a camera IMO but if there way they should have ate the cost and included it.
 
Top