Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
This website Murderpedia has a lot of them.
Tiffany Cole | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Tiffany Cole | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Tiffany Cole, WF, born 12/3/81, was sentenced from Duval County on March 6, 2008 for her role in the double murder of a Jacksonville couple who was buried alive. She is currently on death row at Lowell Correctional Institution.
Tiffany Ann Cole (born December 3, 1981) was found guilty of the kidnapping and first-degree murder of a Duval County, Florida husband and wife and sentenced to death.
Also found guilty in the case were three men: Alan Wade, Bruce Nixon, and Cole's boyfriend Michael Jackson. Prosecutors said Cole and the three men developed a plan to kidnap and kill the couple to steal their money, and dug a grave for them in Charlton County, Georgia two days before knocking on their door and asking to use the phone.
Capital murder case
Cole was a familiar face to Carol and Reggie Sumner, having been a neighbor of the 61-year-old couple when they lived in South Carolina. Also, Cole had bought a car from them at the time the Sumners moved to Florida in March 2005. Cole and her boyfriend went to Florida in late June, 2005 to complete the paperwork on the car and stayed at the Sumner home. Shortly after that visit, in early July 2005, Cole and three men appeared at the Sumners home and asked to use the phone. Reggie Sumner was choked and forced to give the intruders his ATM card and its access number. He and his wife were bound and gagged with duct tape, put into the trunk of their car and driven across the border to Georgia, where, blindfolded and bound, they were pushed into the grave and buried alive.
Cole subsequently pawned jewelry and other items stolen from the Sumners' home, and the ATM card was used to obtain more than $1000 in cash. Three of the group were tracked back to a hotel in South Carolina by the use of the ATM card and arrested there. Juries were later shown photos of Cole and two co-defendants in a limousine, celebrating with champagne and handfuls of cash.
At Cole's week-long trial in October 2007, the jury deliberated less than 90 minutes before finding her guilty of first-degree murder. They voted 9 to 3 that she should receive the death penalty. Five months later, a judge handed down two death sentences for the murders, and a sentence to life in prison for the kidnappings. As of June 2011, she awaits execution at Lowell Correctional Institution Annex.
Cole is one of four women currently on Florida's death row, the others being Margaret Allen, Ana Maria Cardona, and Emilia Carr, all sentenced to death in unrelated cases.
Wade and Jackson also received two death sentences and await execution. Nixon, who had led police to the bodies and testified against the others, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and was sentenced to 45 years in prison.
Deciding Depravity: Tiffany Cole
Cole v. State, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 359 (Fla., Mar. 11, 2010)
Diabolical mastermind or unknowing participant? This was the question the trial court was faced with when asked to decide the fate of Tiffany Ann Cole, an unlikely defendant, charged with two counts of first degree murder, two counts of kidnapping and two counts of robbery. Ultimately, the trial court jury sentenced her to death for the 2005 murders of James and Carol Sumner, who were buried alive by Cole and her co-conspirators in a series of events that are hard to believe.
The Plan
Tiffany Ann Cole had met James and Carol Sumner in South Carolina prior to their move to Jacksonville, Florida, as they were friends of Cole’s father. They had recently sold a vehicle to Cole and offered up their home to her if she was ever in Jacksonville. In June 2005, Cole and Michael James Jackson, her significant other, traveled to Jacksonville to visit Jackson’s friend Alan Wade. Tiffany Cole phoned the Sumners, asking to stay the night. While visiting the couple, Mr. and Mrs. Sumner informed Cole about the $99,000 profit they had made on the sale of their previous South Carolina home.
The Sumners had essentially laid themselves to rest in that moment, as Tiffany Cole, Michael James Jackson, Alan Wade, and another friend of the group, Bruce Kent Nixon, Jr. formulated a plan to rob the victims. In preparation, Nixon stole four shovels in order to dig a hole, while Cole rented a Mazda RX-8. Two days prior to the murder, the group selected a remote location, in Georgia, and dug a large hole – approximately four feet deep and six feet square. Jackson, Wade and Nixon dug the hole, while Cole held the flashlight. The group ultimately decided to kill the Sumner couple by injecting them with a lethal dose of medication after throwing out the idea of going into the house when the couple left for a doctor’s appointment or were away for another reason.
The Murders
On July 8, 2005, Cole and her co-defendants purchased duct tape and plastic wrap. When they arrived at the Sumner household, Cole and Jackson waited outside, knowing they would be recognized. Wade and Nixon rang the doorbell and asked Mrs. Sumner if they could use the phone. When granted entry, Wade ripped the telephone cord from the wall and Nixon used a toy gun to force the 60 year old couple into compliance, binding them with duct tape in their bedroom. After searching the house for bank account records, the victims were taken to the garage and forced into the trunk of their own Lincoln Town Car, which was driven by Wade and Nixon. Cole and Jackson went back to the Sumner house where Jackson gathered a bag of the couple’s belongings and put it into the Mazda.
The foursome drove to the Georgia location where they had previously dug the large hole. Cole and Nixon remained at the end of the road with the Mazda, while the other two defendants took the Lincoln into the woods. Evidence shows that Jackson and Wade were able to retrieve the PIN number to the Sumner’s bank account and ATM card from the couple and then subsequently buried the couple alive. The foursome left the site and discarded the Lincoln, continuing in the Mazda to an ATM where they withdrew money from the victim’s bank account. Cole and Wade returned to the victim’s home later that night after purchasing Clorox and gloves. They took the victim’s computer and jewelry, subsequently pawning the items.
Capture
Homicide detectives learned of the murders when Mrs. Sumner’s daughter contacted them to explain that she had been unable to reach her mother for several days. On July 12, 2005, detectives learned that unusually large sums of money were being withdrawn from the victim’s bank account. Detectives then discovered that someone claiming to be Mr. Sumner, later revealed to be Michael James Jackson, had contacted them. Returning the call, Jackson, as Mr. Sumner, asked for assistance in accessing ‘his’ bank account. The detective asked to speak to Mrs. Sumner and so Cole posed as Mrs. Sumner on the phone for detectives. Detectives, suspicious of the phone calls, used cellular tracking to triangulate the calls. The cell phone history revealed the Mazda rental and, using the GPS, the defendants were soon tracked to a hotel.
In the hotel where Cole, Jackson and Wade were staying, police found the victim’s drivers licenses, credit cards, checkbook, mail and papers indicating the victim’s online passwords, social security numbers and birthdates. There was also a new laptop and bags of new merchandise as well as the victim’s coin collection.
Nixon is the only defendant to have plead guilty. Jackson and Wade were tried separately and each was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and received two death sentences. Cole was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping and two counts of robbery, which brought with it two death sentences, one for each murder.
The Appeal
Tiffany Cole claimed that she believed the crime would be a simple theft and that she did not knowingly participate in the robberies, kidnappings or murders. She also insisted that she did not know the victims were in the trunk of the Lincoln until she arrived at the gravesite. Cole, was, however, the only one of the four defendants to have known the defendants previously.
In charging her with first-degree murder, the heinous, atrocious, cruel aggravator was applied for each count. In her appeal, Cole argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on and in finding the heinous, atrocious, cruel aggravator factor (HAC). She claims that although the murders did qualify as HAC, as the victims were buried alive and the medical examiner named cause of death as ‘mechanical obstruction of the airways by dirt’, the aggravating factor should not be vicariously applied to her based on the manner of death her co-defendants chose.
The court notes that the application of HAC to defendants who did not directly cause the victim’s death had been previously upheld where the defendant was particularly physically involved in the events leading up to the victim’s murder, Cave v. State (1998), Copeland v. State (1984). However, as noted by the appellate court, this case bears the most similarity to Omelus v. State (1991) and the more recent Perez v. State (2005).
In Omelus¸ the appellate court ruled that the trial court had indeed erred in applying HAC where the defendant was not the actual killer, even though he had hired the killer, because there was no evidence that the defendant knew how the killer would carry out the murder. The holding stated that HAC, “cannot be applied vicariously, absent a showing by the State that the defendant directed or knew how the victim would be killed.” In Perez, HAC was also found to be erroneously vicariously applied, despite the fact it was evidenced that Perez was involved in the preparation for the robbery, in covering up the murder and in pawning the victim’s belongings.
The finding in the present case mirrors the above precedents. The heinous, atrocious, cruel aggravator was found to be erroneously vicariously applied to Cole. There was no clear competent, substantial evidence to support a finding that Cole had directed her co-defendants to bury the victims alive or knew, for certain, that this would be their manner of death.
The appellate court, when striking an aggravator, must ensure that there is ‘no reasonable possibility that the error affected the sentence.’ In the present case, there are six remaining aggravators, when HAC is removed. There was also minimal mitigation that did not weigh greatly in the court’s mind. In sum, the appellate court found that there was no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the sentence. Cole’s convictions and sentences were affirmed.
Conclusions
Was Florida right to remove the heinous, atrocious, cruel aggravator from her case? Tiffany Cole’s conviction and death sentences were upheld, however, this particular aggravator was removed, concluding that Cole did not know how the Sumners were going to be murdered in such a heinous manner. Was she really oblivious to the plans Jackson and Wade had for Mr. and Mrs. Sumner or did she keep herself at a distance to protect herself? Does her gender affect the level of depravity evidence in the planning and execution of these crimes? How does Cole’s previous relationship with the Sumners factor into her culpability? Moreover, does the existence of co-conspirators mediate the amount of blame placed on each defendant, or are they all equally culpable?
How do you feel about this crime, it’s level of depravity and it’s relation to The Depravity Scale? Take a look at the items and ask yourself how culpable you feel Cole is. Was she a criminal mastermind, planning and executing a crime, keeping herself at a distance to escape the full prosecution of the law, or was she involved in the beginning planning stages where she became a mere cog in the machine, unknowing and unwilling in the depraved and heinous murder of a couple by burying them alive?
